Clinton Shifts Hard Right!

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
I know I'm responding to sarcasm. That said, what do you think we ought to do about actual terrorism aside from stop getting our panties in a wad about what we call it and who calls it what and why?

Keep fighting it until we win. The U.S. doesn't win anymore. We lose to China, we lose to ISIS, we lose to SuperPACs, we lose to corporate shenanigans, we lose to crowd funding... Next thing you know the next presidential race will feature a crowd funded candidate. #voteorange.
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
And now we have this, a tacit admission that by merely being born a Clinton one is likely to have promising career as a legislator, or possibly future POTUS.

Of the 320 million people in this country, it seems the most likely indicator and key qualification of who will be a future POTUS or high-level politician is who your parents were.

It looks to me like "progessive" now means a belief in hereditary, dynastic politics. It is really just a hop, skip, and jump to a Monarchy from here.

The right already rejected this with the absolute drubbing that Jeb Bush got in the primaries. WTF is wrong with people on the left?


The Clintons just increased their chances of having more presidents
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
And now we have this, a tacit admission that by merely being born a Clinton one is likely to have promising career as a legislator, or possibly future POTUS.

Of the 320 million people in this country, it seems the most likely indicator and key qualification of who will be a future POTUS or high-level politician is who your parents were.

It looks to me like "progessive" now means a belief in hereditary, dynastic politics. It is really just a hop, skip, and jump to a Monarchy from here.

The right already rejected this with the absolute drubbing that Jeb Bush got in the primaries. WTF is wrong with people on the left?


The Clintons just increased their chances of having more presidents

The Bush clan & the Romneys count for nothing, obviously, nor the Rockefellers nor any of these families-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_political_families

But the Clintons? Horrifying!
 

TheGardener

Golden Member
Jul 19, 2014
1,945
33
56
To get back on topic, where is the media's, Ryan's, Obama's and Warren indignation over Hillary's racist rant?
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
You're a couple of months late. The media was reporting on this back in early April.

Funny, I didn't see it.

Trump's Mexican comments on the other hand result in a media blitz.

It's obvious the media reaction was in no way equivalent.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Funny, I didn't see it.

Trump's Mexican comments on the other hand result in a media blitz.

It's obvious the media reaction was in no way equivalent.
It wasn't the media coverage of Trump's racism that hurt his candidacy. Quite the opposite, that always seemed to make him more popular. The coverage of his egotistical buffoonary OTOH has been pretty damning.