• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cletus Can Carry Concealed!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Fanatical Meat said:
Point is you could arrest them for carrying a gun.
Again does this law mean a gang can carry concealed pistols legally?
Click to expand...

Not if they are convicted felons which basically means that if it was a shall issue state they could have paid their $50 (or whatever) and got a concealed carry permit to begin with.
 
Darwin333 said:
Not if they are convicted felons which basically means that if it was a shall issue state they could have paid their $50 (or whatever) and got a concealed carry permit to begin with.
Click to expand...

thye made "antigang" laws so black people in the ghetto cant carry.
 
JSt0rm said:
thye made "antigang" laws so black people in the ghetto cant carry.
Click to expand...

They wrote anti-gang laws because young black males kill each other at a rate higher than any other group in the country, by a couple orders of magnitude. In fact, if you removed the black-on-black murders (black men age 18-35) from US statistics, our rate is the same as Canada and Denmark (within the statistical margin of error).
 
SP33Demon said:
You took it a bit literally there. I meant in the sense that they are around guns their entire life. In any case, it will be a fantastic experiment to see if crime actually does drop when "everyone knows everyone else is packing heat".
Click to expand...

Why would he not take you literally, when you run amok spouting BS 99% of the time.

I know several LEO's that have told me in discussions they would rather open carry was legal, at least you can spot who has weapons easily.

Having concealed without restrictions is a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
MagickMan said:
They wrote anti-gang laws because young black males kill each other at a rate higher than any other group in the country, by a couple orders of magnitude. In fact, if you removed the black-on-black murders (black men age 18-35) from US statistics, our rate is the same as Canada and Denmark (within the statistical margin of error).
Click to expand...


So they removed their rights to have guns because of what they will do? Sounds convenient.
 
fourdegrees11 said:
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

The 2nd Amendment is not changing. GTFO of the USA if you're scared of average Americans carrying guns.

If anti-gun communists cared more about changing the "thug-life" culture instead of trying to institute a nanny state they might have more luck with reducing gun violence.



You do realize that gang members walk around carrying guns in every part of the country regardless of what the law is right? Those gun laws sure work great in Chicago! To bad your average joe has to depend on the cops to protect him there...
Click to expand...

Skipped over "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,"

Member of a Well Regulated Militia?
 
We're about done with the Government helping anyone equation, because they haven't.

Stop worrying about Government, and start doing for yourself. Make yourself the best you can be.

-John
 
OutHouse said:
nice derogatory racist title.
Click to expand...

Cletus.gif
 
At some point it won't matter, and like the zombie movie, a million americans are going to attack you, and your fresh shirt.

If our rights, our personal property rights, our ability to make income, are not respected by the populace, then we are screwed.

-John
 
MagickMan said:
"Well Regulated" simply meant well sorted, re. having sufficient equipment. Not that they were gov't regulated, in the modern sense.

http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." - George Mason

Click to expand...

Interesting.

So the 2nd amendment is for all people unless you come from a certain segment of the population that is more prone to gun violence and then it can be removed based on you being part of that population?
 
sandorski said:
Skipped over "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,"

Member of a Well Regulated Militia?
Click to expand...

Nothing about that statement implies a requirement for the half I quoted.

In fact what it's saying is that if you take away the right to bear arms a "well regulated militia" is not possible, and that it is necessary for a free state.
 
Last edited:
JSt0rm said:
Interesting.

So the 2nd amendment is for all people unless you come from a certain segment of the population that is more prone to gun violence and then it can be removed based on you being part of that population?
Click to expand...

Who is saying that inner city black men should be banned from owning guns? All I would say (and what I'm assuming others are saying) is that it's D'Claudius that's more likely to shoot someone on the street than Cletus. West Virginia, despite being redneck and poor as hell, has a gun homicide rate below average for the country, and I'd like you to show an example of loosened concealed carry laws resulting in significantly higher gun homicide rates.
 
They made a inclusion in the law called the anti gang rule. This was done so inner city youth can't carry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top