Circumcised??

[Martin]

Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Cut and proud...and if we have any sons they will be too and the nurse will use anesthetic. I hear many baby boys sleep right through it.

I think it's become less and less common to be circumcised. Funny cause it's generally liberals opposing circumcision........but they don't mind you circumcising the whole baby up until the minute before it's born. Ironic. Anyway, I think they associate it with the Bible so that makes it BAAADDDD even though it's more convenient and healthier for you and your wife......but that's just science speaking, I'm sure message board ranting is far more credible.

How nice of you to bless OT with your stupidity. And here I was, affraid that it would be confined to P&N.

 

[HeroOfPellinor]

Originally posted by: Martin

Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Cut and proud...and if we have any sons they will be too and the nurse will use anesthetic. I hear many baby boys sleep right through it.

I think it's become less and less common to be circumcised. Funny cause it's generally liberals opposing circumcision........but they don't mind you circumcising the whole baby up until the minute before it's born. Ironic. Anyway, I think they associate it with the Bible so that makes it BAAADDDD even though it's more convenient and healthier for you and your wife......but that's just science speaking, I'm sure message board ranting is far more credible.

How nice of you to bless OT with your stupidity. And here I was, affraid that it would be confined to P&N.

Do you agree or disagree with my statement? And why?

 

[illustri]

HeroOfPellinor

you've got to be some serious manner of fruitcake when you come to a discussion about circumcision and spin it to some liberal vs conservative bull

hell is your penis frickin crinked to the right?

 

[Bryophyte]

Originally posted by: SampSon
The female genetalia isn't any more beautiful sight than a male set. It's a large grouping of flappy skin covering up a fleshy hole, not exactly the most pleasant thing in the world. It's not called an axe wound for no reason whatsoever.

There's a reason why they call it "bumping uglies"...

 

[cavemanmoron]

Originally posted by: maximus maximus

Originally posted by: Chunkee
get a cigar cutter and do it yourself

Yeah and be on the news the next day.

 

[dr150]

They say sensation leading up to orgasm is MUCH higher uncircumsized.

 

[imported_Tomato]

Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor

Originally posted by: Martin

Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Cut and proud...and if we have any sons they will be too and the nurse will use anesthetic. I hear many baby boys sleep right through it.

I think it's become less and less common to be circumcised. Funny cause it's generally liberals opposing circumcision........but they don't mind you circumcising the whole baby up until the minute before it's born. Ironic. Anyway, I think they associate it with the Bible so that makes it BAAADDDD even though it's more convenient and healthier for you and your wife......but that's just science speaking, I'm sure message board ranting is far more credible.

How nice of you to bless OT with your stupidity. And here I was, affraid that it would be confined to P&N.

Do you agree or disagree with my statement? And why?

The belief that there are medical benefits of circumcision is widely held, but close examination reveals it to have little substance.

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: Bryophyte

Originally posted by: notfred
unless you meet women by waving your dick at them and seeing if they respond by sleeping with you.

You're not supposed to do that? DAMNIT

But you're a gurl! :Q

 

[Bryophyte]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Bryophyte

Originally posted by: notfred
unless you meet women by waving your dick at them and seeing if they respond by sleeping with you.

You're not supposed to do that? DAMNIT

But you're a gurl! :Q

:evil:

 

[Bryophyte]

Originally posted by: Orsorum
I'm clean and natural, and I :heart: my foreskin.

Don't we all? :evil:

 

[BornStar]

Originally posted by: dr150
They say sensation leading up to orgasm is MUCH higher uncircumsized.

I have two things to add to this thread.

1. How would anyone know which is better between the two? For there to be a real comparison someone would have had to have been both circumsized and uncircumsized at birth. Otherwise, there's no way to know for sure.

2. Can we please cut out the mutilation talk? I've got two arms, two legs, a normal face. If I walk down the street people don't say "wow, look at that freak; I can tell he's circumsized from here." It wasn't my choice and I'm not a fan of people making fun of something that I didn't willfully do. Besides the fact that it looks completely normal and is fully functional.

That is all.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: notfred
This "women don't like uncircumcised men" argument is such bull sh!t. How many woman do you know that have broken up with a guy or something due to his lack of circumcision? I know 0. Will women think it's different? Probably if they've been with a lot of circumcised men, but it's hardly some kind of relationship killer, unless you meet women by waving your dick at them and seeing if they respond by sleeping with you.

Amusing thread. I chose to reply to this thread for one simple reason, which is that your post just doesn't make sense. If a woman doesn't like something about a man's penis (and of course she doesn't find out until they go to bed), the last person who is ever going to find out is the man. If what she doesn't like is serious enough (i.e. cut/uncut, too small/too big, whatever), then what is likely to happen is that the relationship simply won't last. Sooner or later, there will be the "Can't we still be friends" conversation. I mean, would you hit it if it looked like rotten hamburger and smelled like rank tuna? Not necessarily the same thing, I understand, just trying to illustrate a point because some guys would hit anything, while in my experience it is women who are more choosy.
Just like guys, women have preferences too, even when it comes to that. Sorry to break the news to you. And that's all it is, preferences. Some guys like big tits, some don't, and some don't care as long as she has a tight ass. Same kind of thing. Most people would not stay with a partner that does not meet their preferences unless there are some serious compensating factors.

Anyway, cut/uncut, I don't think it makes that much of a difference. For the record, I'm cut (at birth), and find it very hard to believe that I'm missing out on anything. If some people want to circumcise their male children for relgious, traditional, or perceived health reasons, more power to them. If others don't, more power to them.

 

[Legendary]

Originally posted by: BornStar18

Originally posted by: dr150
They say sensation leading up to orgasm is MUCH higher uncircumsized.

I have two things to add to this thread.

1. How would anyone know which is better between the two? For there to be a real comparison someone would have had to have been both circumsized and uncircumsized at birth. Otherwise, there's no way to know for sure.

2. Can we please cut out the mutilation talk? I've got two arms, two legs, a normal face. If I walk down the street people don't say "wow, look at that freak; I can tell he's circumsized from here." It wasn't my choice and I'm not a fan of people making fun of something that I didn't willfully do. Besides the fact that it looks completely normal and is fully functional.

That is all.

1. There are surgeries in each direction - circumcised <-> non-circumcised

 

[BornStar]

Originally posted by: Legendary

Originally posted by: BornStar18

Originally posted by: dr150
They say sensation leading up to orgasm is MUCH higher uncircumsized.

I have two things to add to this thread.

1. How would anyone know which is better between the two? For there to be a real comparison someone would have had to have been both circumsized and uncircumsized at birth. Otherwise, there's no way to know for sure.

2. Can we please cut out the mutilation talk? I've got two arms, two legs, a normal face. If I walk down the street people don't say "wow, look at that freak; I can tell he's circumsized from here." It wasn't my choice and I'm not a fan of people making fun of something that I didn't willfully do. Besides the fact that it looks completely normal and is fully functional.

That is all.

1. There are surgeries in each direction - circumcised <-> non-circumcised

Either way can make changes. I've spent 22.5 years of my life with a circumsized penis. That's all 22.5 years of my life. A baby can cope extremely easily with changes in physiology whereas someone even 10 years old has a much harder time. That means that the sensations I feel could very well be the same an uncircumsized person feels. No one would have any way of knowing.

 

[moshquerade]

i voted "no".
i have no appendage to get circumcised therefore i didn't go under that knife.

 

[Dr. Detroit]

No way am I beleiving that the reattachment of the skin to a circumcised penis is the same as being au natuale from birth.


No way am I beleiving that the skin being cut off a 30yo mans penis is the same as that being cut from an infant.


Different nerve endings from birth that just aren't so easily replicated.

 

[lokiju]

Once, but I was really drunk and he told me it was normal for friends to do.....


Um, forget I just said that.

 

[Bryophyte]

Originally posted by: Fmr12B
No way am I beleiving that the reattachment of the skin to a circumcised penis is the same as being au natuale from birth.


No way am I beleiving that the skin being cut off a 30yo mans penis is the same as that being cut from an infant.


Different nerve endings from birth that just aren't so easily replicated.

From what I've read, it's not a surgical reattachment, it's more of a "dangle weights to stretch out the skin" sort of procedure.
:Q

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Bryophyte

Originally posted by: Fmr12B
No way am I beleiving that the reattachment of the skin to a circumcised penis is the same as being au natuale from birth.


No way am I beleiving that the skin being cut off a 30yo mans penis is the same as that being cut from an infant.


Different nerve endings from birth that just aren't so easily replicated.

From what I've read, it's not a surgical reattachment, it's more of a "dangle weights to stretch out the skin" sort of procedure.
:Q

:Q indeed... IMO a man would have to have some serious inadequacy issues to go through that type of procedure.

 

[Anonemous]

Originally posted by: blazert40
Once, but I was really drunk and he told me it was normal for friends to do.....


Um, forget I just said that.

:Q

 

[z0mb13]

sampson is obviously biased.

I dont think anyone can ever show an unbiased answer, maybe a person that got cut after adulthood (after experiencing sex both ways). but then he would also be biased since if u get it cut, chances are that person will claim that its the best way of having sex (since he cant have it reversed)

 

[Shawn]

yea, I get one every so often.

 

[Casawi]

you must be circumcized in my religion they do it when you're little like 5 or so. So i dont remember.

 

[dataxpress]

Originally posted by: meltdown75
before and after experiences... RUFK? seriously RUFK me? wow

before: i wasn't born yet.
after: um, i lived my life

rofl.

 

[dataxpress]

Originally posted by: maximus maximus

Originally posted by: GigaCluster
As WhiteWonder pointed out, what a funny way of phrasing the question: "Have you ever been circumsized?" It's a one-time procedure at most. The question is, "Are you circumsized?"

Tell that to this guy

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: WhiteWonder
once or twice
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

you just quoted the guy who was quoted about (whitewonder)