• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cinebench R15 Benchmark Thread

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
This is the benchmark I ran on my system. The specs are: dual 2690v2 xeons clocked at 3.06 GHZ, 128GB ( 8 x 16 GB Samsung DDR3 1600 ecc reg clocked at 1900) of ram, and an Asus Z9PE-D8 WS.

ZccZKEe.jpg
 
New System Built yesterday to replace an old Dell Z800 5660 Workstation

Gigabyte x99 Gaming 5 Motherboard
Intel i7 5930k CPU Running Stable at 4.5Ghz
16Gb Corsair Venegence RAM
Asus Geoforce GTX770 Graphics
Corsair H60 Closed Loop Cooling
Crucial 512Gb SSD Boot Drive

CINEBENCH 15 Results

1261 Multicore
168 Singlecore

cine1.jpg
 
5960x@4500mhz
Ram @ 3000 15 15 15 35
With more tweek time I should be able to run test at 4600mhz.

CineBench for what ever reason was not reading the real CPU speed it misread it at 4.375ghz when it really was 4.5ghz. Shrug!!!!


cinebench2.JPG
 
Last edited:
wow... those are some amazing and impressive scores these new i7-5960x chips are putting up... looks like just to keep my Opterons from being embarrassed i am going to have to add two more 6180SEs and Win 2008 R2 server just to keep up... eesh.
 
FiLeZz said:
CineBench for what ever reason was not reading the real CPU speed it misread it at 4.375ghz when it really was 4.5ghz. Shrug!!!!
Click to expand...

No, look closer, CB is showing it as 3.75 GHz.
I believe CB just takes the base CPU multiplier and times that by the detected clock speed. So in your case, 30 x 125 = 3.75 GHz

Now that most CPUs have Turbo modes where cores run at different clock speeds its really hard to justify what the real CPU speed is anymore, so unless you have manually locked in all cores to a set MHz or set all cores to turbo upto the same multiplier its a fuzzy value. The next time I do a score sheet for a benchmark I doubt I'll even include the CPU MHz, if your curious enough you'll just have to look at their post/screen shot or ask them what each core was running at! Getting too complicated LOL!
 
Last edited:
Yowser! Very nice! These become quite Beastly when ramped up! 😉
Nice rig, nice overclock. Good job! 🙂
 
Last edited:
4690k@4.6ghz DDR3 Ripjaw 1600mhz stock timings- I try to avoid Cinebench software, it freezes up Core-Temp add on, and all of my OSD keyboard LCD software. This is before I got my 2x 770 SC ACX Sli.
Cinebenchresults46ghz_zps4ed9926e.png
 
Last edited:
latest results from my 5 year old dual Opteron 8439SE rig...

i managed to find the sweet spot for ref clock... 229 MHz. Processors run rock solid at 3.2 GHz at stock voltage (i am unable to increase voltage unfortunately - processor is locked). Any more than a ref clock of 233... and reboots ensue.

But i think this is a pretty darn good performance for a 2009 vintage setup! Back when this Tyan board was running dual Opteron 2212s... the score was 174.

1263861.jpg
 
Last edited:
Latest results for my quad opty home project PC:

Its the baseline after updating to 4 Opteron "Magny Cours" 61xx "Extra Spicy's" (4x12 K10 cores). These are running at stock 2.1 GHz.

2300

1266551.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top