- Apr 27, 2000
Whew that must be a trip to watch the model rendered 32 segments at a time.
It's unclear which number is correct.Nice CB15 score!
Why people say top 2% when AMD slide says 5%?
Source: http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3015-amd-threadripper-1950x-1920x-review?showall=1Per-core overclocking is not available on Threadripper, and won’t be. Overclocking can be done in core pairs, with OC expectations similar to Ryzen. AMD noted that the Threadripper CPUs consist of the top 5% of presorted Ryzen dies (though later changed this number to 2%, depending on who was talking).
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|G||Question 9700K after overlock - same benchmark score||CPUs and Overclocking||6|
|H||Discussion [WCCF] Intel Claims Xeon Cascade Lake-AP 56 Core CPU Up To 84% Faster Than AMD’s 64 Core EPYC Rome 7742 in Real-World HPC Benchmarks||CPUs and Overclocking||45|
|Question Benchmarks.... PassMark vs. Geekbench||CPUs and Overclocking||13|
|N||Intel Shows That Their 9th Gen Core CPU Lineup Is Faster Than AMD Ryzen 3000 In Everything Except Cinebench||CPUs and Overclocking||164|
|C||【Maxon】Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread||CPUs and Overclocking||221|
|Question 9700K after overlock - same benchmark score|
|Discussion [WCCF] Intel Claims Xeon Cascade Lake-AP 56 Core CPU Up To 84% Faster Than AMD’s 64 Core EPYC Rome 7742 in Real-World HPC Benchmarks|
|Question Benchmarks.... PassMark vs. Geekbench|
|Intel Shows That Their 9th Gen Core CPU Lineup Is Faster Than AMD Ryzen 3000 In Everything Except Cinebench|
|【Maxon】Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread|