Originally posted by: toekramp
If you don't believe me you can ask the drunk girl i was talking to tonight. I was one of "those people" that believes whatever the media puts out, including all the bul|****** about lung cancer.
Girls are awesome.
Originally posted by: toekramp
If you don't believe me you can ask the drunk girl i was talking to tonight. I was one of "those people" that believes whatever the media puts out, including all the bul|****** about lung cancer.
Girls are awesome.
Originally posted by: SophalotJack
dude, you last 15 minutes?
either you are doing something wrong... or I am.
don't lump us all into one group.Originally posted by: toekramp
If you don't believe me you can ask the drunk girl i was talking to tonight. I was one of "those people" that believes whatever the media puts out, including all the bul|****** about lung cancer.
Girls are awesome.
hopefully you are not serious about your second sentence.Originally posted by: LoathedSynapse
Cigarettes are bad for you. But second-hand is pure baseless hysteria.
Originally posted by: moshquerade
hopefully you are not serious about your second sentence.Originally posted by: LoathedSynapse
Cigarettes are bad for you. But second-hand is pure baseless hysteria.
question: is smoke bad for smokers?Originally posted by: LoathedSynapse
Originally posted by: moshquerade
hopefully you are not serious about your second sentence.Originally posted by: LoathedSynapse
Cigarettes are bad for you. But second-hand is pure baseless hysteria.
Well, when scientists can be bought with politics, who really cares anymore?
Originally posted by: sandorski
Well, that settles that. Ask her about STDs, maybe there's more good news.
Originally posted by: blahblah99
Originally posted by: toekramp
If you don't believe me you can ask the drunk girl i was talking to tonight. I was one of "those people" that believes whatever the media puts out, including all the bul|****** about lung cancer.
Girls are awesome.
What's wrong with that? Easy lay!
To say nothing of the pesticide applied during storage or the concentration of radioactive elements from groundsoil.Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Natural Un adulterated tobacco has never been studied.
The studies have been done with chemically treated tobacco.
The tobacco in commercial cigarettes has ammonia compounds in it to free base the nicotine to make it more effective and thus more addictive.
None of that can be good for you.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Well, that settles that. Ask her about STDs, maybe there's more good news.
Originally posted by: myusername
To say nothing of the pesticide applied during storage or the concentration of radioactive elements from groundsoil.Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Natural Un adulterated tobacco has never been studied.
The studies have been done with chemically treated tobacco.
The tobacco in commercial cigarettes has ammonia compounds in it to free base the nicotine to make it more effective and thus more addictive.
None of that can be good for you.
I still quit and won't be starting again, but the science against "tobacco" per se is very very weak.
