Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
So we have a bunch of winnar bashing and no substance from his opponents? I guess he struck a chord. This is one of the many reasons that it's ridiculous for the government to be throwing money at private industry.
read the article (like actually read it)
read the commentary
its not a problem of them making suv's, its the fact that they are only making suv's
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.
Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!
last i checked toyota/nissan/honda has lost billions on their respective suv/truck programs.
its not like building trucks is a bad thing, because many people actually need them. It's the over reliance on them that is the problem.
No company enters a market if it is not expected to be profitable and it was enormously profitable for a period of time.
Now, we are in a recession so people first aren't buying and what they are buying are not 50 mpg cars. The prius is piling up on docks as are many other small cars. But SUVs and trucks aren't selling because no one is spending even though gas is relatively cheap.
When the economy turns around and gas stays under $4, SUVs/trucks will lead the company's back to the black. If gas is expensive, big vehicles will not sell well. Bottom line, the market decides and company's either go with the market or go out of business.
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
So we have a bunch of winnar bashing and no substance from his opponents? I guess he struck a chord. This is one of the many reasons that it's ridiculous for the government to be throwing money at private industry.
read the article (like actually read it)
read the commentary
its not a problem of them making suv's, its the fact that they are only making suv's
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.
Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.
Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!
One other point... Toyota is still at a net loss for their much revered Prius. The main reason they can afford to sell it is because of their other profitable cars/trucks.
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
I know Toyota and Honda both make small cars in the US. Perhaps they are losing money on those cars as well? Or perhaps it is the large volume of those cars that allows them to offset the cost of making them etc etc.
Perhaps the solution for Chrysler is to make the big cars in the US and import small cars via Fiat etc.
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.
Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!
One other point... Toyota is still at a net loss for their much revered Prius. The main reason they can afford to sell it is because of their other profitable cars/trucks.
Which brings up another point. There are such things as loss leaders. And as a product gains acceptance, it becomes less expensive to produce. Say like LCD tvs. The first one I ever say years ago was $25,000 - I think it was a 40" or something. Now I can get one for $500.
Not the same with cars, I understand but the point I am trying to make is.
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
You're fucking ridiculous.
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?
not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.
+GMC Yukon
Maybe he meant "affordable" and "cost efficient"?
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?
not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...
Indeed - do the math and figure out what the gas price threshold would be for you to have it make sense. I did this exercise last year when my wife and I were looking at cars.
It would have taken us more than 7 years to make up just the initial cost of the vehicle at $4.00/gallon. This was not taking into account extra repair/insurance/registration costs of a hybrid vehicle.
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.
focus is hecho in mexico. so was neon, iirc.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??
Are they making money off of them?
The Durango doesn't sell
The Nitro doesn't sell
The Compass doesn't sell
The Aspen doesn't sell
The Caliber is on the decline
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
What about tax deductions for state and federal? Lower depreciation than a normal car? You should come out ahead unless you have to replace the battery.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....
my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..
Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?
not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...
Indeed - do the math and figure out what the gas price threshold would be for you to have it make sense. I did this exercise last year when my wife and I were looking at cars.
It would have taken us more than 7 years to make up just the initial cost of the vehicle at $4.00/gallon. This was not taking into account extra repair/insurance/registration costs of a hybrid vehicle.
What about tax deductions for state and federal? Lower depreciation than a normal car? You should come out ahead unless you have to replace the battery.
Originally posted by: Drako
Negative, you do not come out ahead. Life expectancy of most hybrid batteries is pretty long, 8 to 10 years so that's not really an issue in the short term. The tax credits had expired on the vehicles we looked at, so no advantage there.
Originally posted by: senseamp
If they were really "defying the far leftist agenda" they would not be asking for a government bailout, which I don't think they should get.
