Chrysler unveils the new Grand Cherokee

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
So we have a bunch of winnar bashing and no substance from his opponents? I guess he struck a chord. This is one of the many reasons that it's ridiculous for the government to be throwing money at private industry.

read the article (like actually read it)

read the commentary

its not a problem of them making suv's, its the fact that they are only making suv's
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??

Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.

Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!

last i checked toyota/nissan/honda has lost billions on their respective suv/truck programs.

its not like building trucks is a bad thing, because many people actually need them. It's the over reliance on them that is the problem.

No company enters a market if it is not expected to be profitable and it was enormously profitable for a period of time.

Now, we are in a recession so people first aren't buying and what they are buying are not 50 mpg cars. The prius is piling up on docks as are many other small cars. But SUVs and trucks aren't selling because no one is spending even though gas is relatively cheap.

When the economy turns around and gas stays under $4, SUVs/trucks will lead the company's back to the black. If gas is expensive, big vehicles will not sell well. Bottom line, the market decides and company's either go with the market or go out of business.

more often than not, expectations are wrong, the japanese companies entered the market right as it was tanking. when the economy turns around i will again be the cars that will drive the big-jap3 bak to profitability, not its failed suv/truck endeavor.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.

i think thats the entire concept of the criticism of chrysler. both GM an Ford have good balance in their portfolios, chrysler, not so much.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
So we have a bunch of winnar bashing and no substance from his opponents? I guess he struck a chord. This is one of the many reasons that it's ridiculous for the government to be throwing money at private industry.

read the article (like actually read it)

read the commentary

its not a problem of them making suv's, its the fact that they are only making suv's
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??

Chrysler made plenty of profits in 2004-2006. Instead of sticking to what they are good at, liberals want to make them produce a bunch of garbage.
 

Pneumothorax

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2002
1,182
23
81
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.

Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!

One other point... Toyota is still at a net loss for their much revered Prius. The main reason they can afford to sell it is because of their other profitable cars/trucks.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.

I know Toyota and Honda both make small cars in the US. Perhaps they are losing money on those cars as well? Or perhaps it is the large volume of those cars that allows them to offset the cost of making them etc etc.

Perhaps the solution for Chrysler is to make the big cars in the US and import small cars via Fiat etc.
 

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.

Exactly. The market will determine what the manufacturers produce. If they pick wrong, they go out of business. If any business is smart, they identify their target customers and offer those customers a selection of products.
 

dphantom

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2005
4,763
327
126
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.

Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!

One other point... Toyota is still at a net loss for their much revered Prius. The main reason they can afford to sell it is because of their other profitable cars/trucks.

Which brings up another point. There are such things as loss leaders. And as a product gains acceptance, it becomes less expensive to produce. Say like LCD tvs. The first one I ever say years ago was $25,000 - I think it was a 40" or something. Now I can get one for $500.

Not the same with cars, I understand but the point I am trying to make is.
 

Drako

Lifer
Jun 9, 2007
10,697
161
106
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?

 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Whatever happened to offering a good selection of both competitive small cars *and* larger vehicles? At least Ford is getting that right, and GM is getting close.
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.

I know Toyota and Honda both make small cars in the US. Perhaps they are losing money on those cars as well? Or perhaps it is the large volume of those cars that allows them to offset the cost of making them etc etc.

Perhaps the solution for Chrysler is to make the big cars in the US and import small cars via Fiat etc.

??? Ford makes a profit on the Focus, it's a good car in the segment, and it's selling very well. Ford is bringing the Fiesta out (subcompact 40mpg). They're not just doing this to help their fleet with CAFE bullshit, they're doing it because there's a demand for quality small cars, and it's nice to see a US carmaker with a competitive product finally.

The old Neons, Escorts, and Cadavaliers were no match for Civic and Corolla in comfort, features, safety, reliability, and so on. Now when you compare a Cobalt to a Corolla, or a Focus to a Civic, you find a much more level playing ground, with the cars trading top marks in various categories.
 

cubeless

Diamond Member
Sep 17, 2001
4,295
1
81
Originally posted by: dphantom
Originally posted by: Pneumothorax
Originally posted by: dphantom
Exactly. Sheesh, I would never make any product that I lost money on. If I produced a 50 mpg car that I lost $2000 per vehicle sold and also produced a 20mpg truck on which I made $5000, well it takes no fracking genius to figure out what to do.

Why do people think (or not actually) why Toyata and Nissan et al all entered the big SUV market? Because it's a MONEY MAKER!

One other point... Toyota is still at a net loss for their much revered Prius. The main reason they can afford to sell it is because of their other profitable cars/trucks.

Which brings up another point. There are such things as loss leaders. And as a product gains acceptance, it becomes less expensive to produce. Say like LCD tvs. The first one I ever say years ago was $25,000 - I think it was a 40" or something. Now I can get one for $500.

Not the same with cars, I understand but the point I am trying to make is.

the concept of 'loss leader' doesn't work as well with cars:
1) unlike the supermarket, you don't buy a bunch of other stuff to help make up for it
2) it leads to the car salesman being reviled for upselling you
3) there's very little brand loyalty any more
4) if you sell a lot of loss leaders you just have loss... (like when gas got expensive)...

the domestics are in trouble... will be interesting to see what happens when gm goes into bankruptcy...

the next thread should be : why do we need 'american' car companies... don't we just want the cars to be made here to provide employment? who cares who's the boss? bo can make it so expensive to import cars that all production (not just the large amount already being done) would have to be done here...
 

JACKDRUID

Senior member
Nov 28, 2007
729
0
0
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?

not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.

+GMC Yukon

Maybe he meant "affordable" and "cost efficient"?
 

Drako

Lifer
Jun 9, 2007
10,697
161
106
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?

not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...

Indeed - do the math and figure out what the gas price threshold would be for you to have it make sense. I did this exercise last year when my wife and I were looking at cars.

It would have taken us more than 7 years to make up just the initial cost of the vehicle at $4.00/gallon. This was not taking into account extra repair/insurance/registration costs of a hybrid vehicle.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.

+GMC Yukon

Maybe he meant "affordable" and "cost efficient"?

Maybe. Escapes are pretty affordable, as are Mariner and Highlander (for what you get). We dont know his price range though. But to say there arent any available is wrong. Im sure there will be a qualifying follow-up post explaining why these arent viable for him.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
143
106
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?

not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...

Indeed - do the math and figure out what the gas price threshold would be for you to have it make sense. I did this exercise last year when my wife and I were looking at cars.

It would have taken us more than 7 years to make up just the initial cost of the vehicle at $4.00/gallon. This was not taking into account extra repair/insurance/registration costs of a hybrid vehicle.

What about tax deductions for state and federal? Lower depreciation than a normal car? You should come out ahead unless you have to replace the battery.

 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Ford Escape. Merc Mariner. Lexus RX 400h. Toyota Highlander. Caddy Escalade. To name a few.

4 wagons and 1 proper SUV.

not sure if any of them are 4wd either.



anyway, iirc, chrysler co-developed the 2-mode hybrid with GM. not sure why they've not done anything with it yet in the consumer space.


toyota develops hybrid system which, even at $4 a gallon, likely will never be recouped by the consumer, gets praised.

GM develops hybrid system which at basically any price will be recouped by the consumer (the bus companies which easily rack up 100s of miles per day), gets ignored.

awesome.


Originally posted by: ProfJohn
The US companies have a hard time making small cars at a profit due to the high factory costs in UAW run plants.
focus is hecho in mexico. so was neon, iirc.



Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
If they only make money on SUV's then why should they make anything else??

Are they making money off of them?

The Durango doesn't sell
The Nitro doesn't sell
The Compass doesn't sell
The Aspen doesn't sell
The Caliber is on the decline

dodge caliber is an ugly fwd compact wagon. in no way, shape, or form could anyone call it an SUV. it has a nissan transmission, a hyundai engine, and shares its platform with the mitsubishi lancer (as do the jeep compass and patriot, neither of which are SUVs).
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: SP33Demon

What about tax deductions for state and federal? Lower depreciation than a normal car? You should come out ahead unless you have to replace the battery.

depreciation hasn't necessarily been any better, and is often worse. it can be a crap shoot. you also need to consider that there may be higher finance charges because the factory doesn't need to use finance incentives, on top of the fact that more has to be financed because of the higher price. insurance costs may be higher or lower as well.
 

Drako

Lifer
Jun 9, 2007
10,697
161
106
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
Originally posted by: Drako
Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
I do not understand why they insisted on making the vehicle more fuel effecient, but refuse to put in a hybrid engine instead....

my bro in law was looking for a 4wd suv with a hybrid engine and he couldn't find none..

Becuase hybrid engines do not make economic sense for the manufacturer or for the consumer?

not now.. but if gas prices rises again, it will...

Indeed - do the math and figure out what the gas price threshold would be for you to have it make sense. I did this exercise last year when my wife and I were looking at cars.

It would have taken us more than 7 years to make up just the initial cost of the vehicle at $4.00/gallon. This was not taking into account extra repair/insurance/registration costs of a hybrid vehicle.

What about tax deductions for state and federal? Lower depreciation than a normal car? You should come out ahead unless you have to replace the battery.

Negative, you do not come out ahead. Life expectancy of most hybrid batteries is pretty long, 8 to 10 years so that's not really an issue in the short term. The tax credits had expired on the vehicles we looked at, so no advantage there.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
ElFenix, for all intents and purposes, it was Daimler, which still has the system.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
If they were really "defying the far leftist agenda" they would not be asking for a government bailout, which I don't think they should get.
 

Pneumothorax

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2002
1,182
23
81
Originally posted by: Drako
Negative, you do not come out ahead. Life expectancy of most hybrid batteries is pretty long, 8 to 10 years so that's not really an issue in the short term. The tax credits had expired on the vehicles we looked at, so no advantage there.

Yup the closest to a hybrid making economic sense is when our gas prices skyrocket in the $6-7 range. Then you'll start to recoup the Prius gas mileage advantages. The cheapest hybrid coming out if from Honda with their $20K Insight would recoup it's higher cost much faster than a $25-$30K prius.

This bugs on how there's so much hype on GM's $40K volt, unless they cut that car's price in half it will be stillborn.

BTW the tax credits expired over a year ago lol.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: senseamp
If they were really "defying the far leftist agenda" they would not be asking for a government bailout, which I don't think they should get.

Yeah, and while I don't like them being told what to do, if anything, they need a kick in the butt. Chrysler just doesn't seem to get it. You can say Daimler didn't help them at all at the end, but still. Sure, they have a few vehicles you can expect we'll always see (Cherokee, Wrangler and Ram), but as a whole, Chrysler's line is terrible. They don't have a competitive midsize sedan, which is essential. I hope the Fiat deal goes through though. The Fiat Punto Grande would be a great replacement for the Calibur. A small car that actually looks good.