Christie’s Lawyer: Governor Not Involved In ‘Bridgegate’ Plot

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,068
700
126
Either he was in on it, or he had no idea what his administration was actually up to.

In my mind at least, both are equally bad.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
This is like when cigarette makers hired their own medical professionals to look into the hazards of smoking - nothing could possibly be skewed with the outcome from something like that,...
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
This is like when cigarette makers hired their own medical professionals to look into the hazards of smoking - nothing could possibly be skewed with the outcome from something like that,...


This is a like a FU to the taxpayers.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
and if he hadn't done an internal review, wouldn't he just be accused of trying to cover stuff up?
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
and if he hadn't done an internal review, wouldn't he just be accused of trying to cover stuff up?

There were a lot of other options? 1.) He could have asked the DOJ to appoint an independent investigator.

You really don't think there is something wrong with someone hiring an attorney to run an investigation who doesn't interview the most important people and then paying them 1 million tax payers dollars?

edit: I meant the State Attorney General's Office.
 
Last edited:

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
There were a lot of other options? 1.) He could have asked the DOJ to appoint an independent investigator.

You really don't think there is something wrong with someone hiring an attorney to run an investigation who doesn't interview the most important people and then paying them 1 million tax payers dollars?
'Cause if there's one thing we know, it's that the DoJ is above politics.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,504
50,671
136
'Cause if there's one thing we know, it's that the DoJ is above politics.

Not to mention that the DOJ only appoints independent counsels for the federal executive.

I have to say that using taxpayer funds to have your own personal investigation into yourself that clears you only makes you look more guilty.

Of course the legislature is going to try and tar and feather him so I'm not saying that he needs to just let them do whatever they want and accept their investigation at face value, but I don't think this did him any favors.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Not to mention that the DOJ only appoints independent counsels for the federal executive.

I have to say that using taxpayer funds to have your own personal investigation into yourself that clears you only makes you look more guilty.

Of course the legislature is going to try and tar and feather him so I'm not saying that he needs to just let them do whatever they want and accept their investigation at face value, but I don't think this did him any favors.
Agreed. If you hire someone to investigate you, the assumption is always that you hired someone so that they will exonerate you.

Note that the IRS, the DoJ and the BATFE are all investigating themselves . . .
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
Agreed. If you hire someone to investigate you, the assumption is always that you hired someone so that they will exonerate you.

Note that the IRS, the DoJ and the BATFE are all investigating themselves . . .

I did mean the state Attorney General's office. And you could find a way to appoint an independent investigator with subpoena power.

Of course politics plays a role in everything, but that shouldn't stop you from attempting to do something.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,504
50,671
136
Agreed. If you hire someone to investigate you, the assumption is always that you hired someone so that they will exonerate you.

Note that the IRS, the DoJ and the BATFE are all investigating themselves . . .

While I agree that internal investigations are inherently problematic, they are not the only ones investigating conduct. For example, the FBI also investigated the IRS and Congress has being doing it too, although Congress' investigation has been pretty embarrassingly partisan much like I imagine the NJ legislature's investigation will be.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
While I agree that internal investigations are inherently problematic, they are not the only ones investigating conduct. For example, the FBI also investigated the IRS and Congress has being doing it too, although Congress' investigation has been pretty embarrassingly partisan much like I imagine the NJ legislature's investigation will be.

I've been impressed with the committee. Esp. John Wisniewski. I'm assuming some politics are in play (they are obviously democrats), but it hasn't been embarrassing yet.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,504
50,671
136
I've been impressed with the committee. Esp. John Wisniewski. I'm assuming some politics are in play (they are obviously democrats), but it hasn't been embarrassing yet.

I haven't followed the NJ legislature's investigation at all, so maybe they will surprise me!
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Christie hires a law firm to represent the Governor's office and run an investigation into the Scandal. They come back and say Christie is is not involved. And the taxpayers pay them 1 million dollars.

What were they supposed to say?

You can't make this stuff up...

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/03/27/christies-lawyer-governor-not-involved-in-gwb-plot/

I am thankful the judicial systems in this country side with me that evidence is more important than individuals' gut feelings.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
There were a lot of other options? 1.) He could have asked the DOJ to appoint an independent investigator.

You really don't think there is something wrong with someone hiring an attorney to run an investigation who doesn't interview the most important people and then paying them 1 million tax payers dollars?

edit: I meant the State Attorney General's Office.

If you look at the report (pdf) linked in the article it indicates that the DoJ is investigating it.

The NJ legislature is also investigating with select committees. Select committees have more power, and jurisdiction, than regular congressional committees. In addition it is headed by a Dem so I imagine it will be pretty rigorous.

It looks like the "most important people" refused to comply. The law firm that was hired to do the investigation wouldn't have the power to subpoena so their refusal to comply is fully expected. No way their lawyers would allow them to participate.

But yes, such statements seem self serving and are entirely unconvincing. As such it was a waste of taxpayer money.

Fern
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Good. Now Christie can get back to more important things....




Like his third plate of pasta!
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,615
39,939
136
Guess we can't call this the The Sarah Palin method of defense with the DoJ involved, but still - wow. This just accelerates my declining opinion of Christie even more.

He needs to do NJ a favor and retire, and I'm sure many in the GOP would be relieved with that as well. He did, after all, shake the Presidents hand.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I did mean the state Attorney General's office. And you could find a way to appoint an independent investigator with subpoena power.

Of course politics plays a role in everything, but that shouldn't stop you from attempting to do something.
I'm not sure this would really rise to the level of an independent prosecutor, but that's the only way to get an even halfway honest investigation.

Personally I'm not greatly concerned about this in the great scheme of things, but I can only see two possibilities here. Either Christie knew about it, or Christie maintained an administration where his underlings felt comfortable doing it. I'm not sure the latter is much less damning. Either way, not a man to whom I'd feel comfortable ceding more power. Especially after Obama.

While I agree that internal investigations are inherently problematic, they are not the only ones investigating conduct. For example, the FBI also investigated the IRS and Congress has being doing it too, although Congress' investigation has been pretty embarrassingly partisan much like I imagine the NJ legislature's investigation will be.
Congress' investigation is going nowhere. The IRS has snubbed its nose at them at every turn. Essentially they are the Mafia with badges.

Well, at least you're not bitter.


Wishing death on a man with a family. Stay classy KK.
:D +1

I heard on the radio, I think NPR, that Christie had lost a hundred pounds with lap band surgery. Can anyone confirm this? I don't see much television but snaps I've seen of him aren't looking thinner that I can tell.
 

emperus

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2012
7,807
1,560
126
I'm not sure this would really rise to the level of an independent prosecutor, but that's the only way to get an even halfway honest investigation.

Personally I'm not greatly concerned about this in the great scheme of things, but I can only see two possibilities here. Either Christie knew about it, or Christie maintained an administration where his underlings felt comfortable doing it. I'm not sure the latter is much less damning. Either way, not a man to whom I'd feel comfortable ceding more power. Especially after Obama.


Congress' investigation is going nowhere. The IRS has snubbed its nose at them at every turn. Essentially they are the Mafia with badges.


:D +1

I heard on the radio, I think NPR, that Christie had lost a hundred pounds with lap band surgery. Can anyone confirm this? I don't see much television but snaps I've seen of him aren't looking thinner that I can tell.

I wouldn't have figured you for an NPR guy. He has lost some weight. Still looks like humpty dumpty though.. I know that was mean.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I wouldn't have figured you for an NPR guy. He has lost some weight. Still looks like humpty dumpty though.. I know that was mean.
There's a lot of crap on NPR and a definite liberal bias, but it's also an organization that has recognized its bias and (I think) honestly attempts to report the facts. Gotta respect that, and you don't have that in the mainstream media or Fox News. Also, it's not shrill and bitter like so much on both sides, so that's nice.

The best I've heard is ABC Radio News, but my local talk radio station went to Fox News Radio. Besides, I've gotten to the point that I can't usually take more than ten or fifteen minutes of talk radio and their news is more spread out than NPR's so it's hard to consume.

And besides, NPR goes so nicely with my Grateful Dead music . . .
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,160
136
Stinks to high heaven.
But I suppose thatz Jersey politics.
Especially with this governor.
Waiting for the kiss of death?
Just hope he wipes the pasta off his mug beforehand.
Yecky Yecky

Everyone demands immunity before spilling the beans.
Buf Im sure the fat guy has it all under control.
Ya think?