• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Choices, too many of them !

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Wrong. It's much more amusing to make economic analysis based on perceived value/$, potential value lost over time, and hypothetical scenarios with no relation to the real world. Perhaps you never had a project management class?

The amount of fun I have in a game (or ROI) is not based on what the preceived net present market value of the game at the time I play it. it isn't more (or less) fun six months or six years from now even though others might be purchasing the game at a lower price at that time. The point is I didn't puchase at a different time, so I am not going to worry about what I could have/should have/would have done and I am going to value the experience equally and according to it's entertainment value. Not how much i would have saved had I acted differently than I did.

Now, if you had said "Provided you plan on reselling the game you might want to finish it sooner so that your resale doesn't depreciate", that I could agree with. And in that scenario, it is true that the resale will reduce your net investment and thus increase your ROI by deminishing the I component. But in this case, "R" is a constant as gameplay relative to itself does not change based on market price.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the suggestions. I'll be finishing the witcher first, then DA:O and lastly skyrim 😀. I'm enjoying getting the "booty" cards from the witcher >.> !
 
Back
Top