• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Chocolate Beer - anyone tried any various brands?

destrekor

Lifer
So I just finished my bottle of Dogfish Head's Theobroma. It's a beer brewed with cocoa and various other spices and ingredients.

It's very surprising, in multiple ways.

[It's a 9% beer, so the surprises are coupled with that.]

First, after I poured it, I was amazed at how light it was. It's got a nice red ale color, the head isn't very stable and doesn't seem to be very carbonated, but it doesn't seem to be lacking too much either. Feels like a beer when drinking it. (Recently finally found Sam Adams Double Bock and gave that a try. less carbonated it seems, and starts treading toward "not as beer like as other beers, but still beer" territory. also, very very rich, and kind of sweet. but delicious.)

I take a sip, and in no way does it make it obvious it's a stronger beer. It doesn't have a potent bite, and isn't very heavy feeling. It doesn't need to be a sipping beer, unlike the SA Double Bock, which was quite heavy and rich, it demanded to be sipped. Both are very enjoyable.

It's flavor is wonderful. The cocoa flavor is in the background at first, and it leaves a mild aftertaste of having just taken a sip of a cold cocoa beverage. But the other flavors in the beer complement it very well, the spices are balanced and it doesn't make you gag with an overwhelming chocolate-only flavor. Not a single flavor really dominates, and none really compete for your attention. The chocolate is an attention grabber, but imho, going into it, you know you are drinking a cocoa beer, so you might be looking for it more. Otherwise, you get a nice hint of cocoa in the sipping process, with the only standout cocoa presence being in the aftertaste, and even then notes of other spices are present and complement the combined flavor, which works excellently to act as a middle ground between the beer base and the cocoa's presence, blending them all together in a very complementary way.

I'd definitely recommend this as something to have on rare occasions. I'll purchase it again, but not often. And that's if I can find it when I'm on campus. Big beverage center here in my hometown that has a ton of imported and specialty brews.

At 11.99, the 750ml bottle (1 pint, 9ish oz) isn't cheap. But it being a 9% ABV beer, and it obviously being marketed as a specialty beer, it's worthwhile.

Something to split between two people as a reward, or to go with a fine dinner (no idea what main course this beer would complement the best, any ideas?), I'd highly recommend this.
 
sounds interesting... i would love to try it sometime.

i saw yesterday or a couple days ago, that there's a brewery in the DC area called Shenandoah Brewing that serve donut beer. i want to try that too.
 
Rogue Chocolate Stout is pretty good, but not something you'd want a lot of at one time. The chocolate taste isn't overdone, not too sweet. I don't like sweet beers at all.
 
I've had several including Rogue, Young's and Brooklyn and they're all pretty darn good. I certainly wouldn't want a 750ml bottle of any of them though, that's way too much of that variety of beer. They're a nice after dinner drink, something to have instead of coffee.
 
Rogue Chocolate is probably my favorite mainstream, but it's got stupid expensive over the years. Otherwise, for chocolate stouts I brew my own or stick to local microbrews.
 
Sounds good if you only drink one like you said. Speciality beers have a strong after taste that can spoil a meal or your toilet bowl.
 
Originally posted by: vi edit
Rogue Chocolate is probably my favorite mainstream, but it's got stupid expensive over the years. Otherwise, for chocolate stouts I brew my own or stick to local microbrews.

Rouge Chocolate is tasty!
 
have never had one that i recall... i do have a Stone Vertical Epic sitting in my closet with a 12-12-12 date to drink after...
 
I've had Young's Double Chocolate Stout. It's pretty good. One ingredient is real dark chocolate.
 
Sam Adams Chocolate Bock was pretty good. It was $14 for a 750ML bottle. I just tried a Stone Brew Arrogant Bastard and it was one of those "once in a while" beers like the Chocolate Bock, but ~$6 for the same size.
 
I had the Theobroma about a month ago. It's definitely not like other chocolate stouts. It's recipe comes from the Inca (cant remember offhand) civilization. The recipe used is considered to be that of the first drink to use chocolate. Theobroma or "drink of the gods" is pretty awesome, you can easily drink a 22oz'er without feeling like you're drinking strait chocolate. It also has chilies in it. It's one hell of a beer. I give it a B+.
 
I've had a few different Chocolate flavored beers. You'll see more chocolates in the middle of winter.

Now, I'm jealous. Just went on a beer run yesterday and they didn't have this.

I am drinking a Dogfish Head Pangaea. They must want me drunk, this sucker is 25.6 oz. I'm on my second.
 
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.

Dopplebocks are typically brewed using chocolate malts which while not as blunt as dumping bakers chocolate in, does provide a bit of chocolate aroma and minor flavor.
 
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: Perknose
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.

Dopplebocks are typically brewed using chocolate malts which while not as blunt as dumping bakers chocolate in, does provide a bit of chocolate aroma and minor flavor.

Lol, there is no actual chocolate in the so-called chocolate malts.

Edit: And, anyway, no doppelbock tastes like it has chocolate in it. It may be syrupy sweet, with a kind of roasted nut like flavor, but has zero actual chocolate taste.

Didn't you say you've brewed this stuff? 😛
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: Perknose
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.

Dopplebocks are typically brewed using chocolate malts which while not as blunt as dumping bakers chocolate in, does provide a bit of chocolate aroma and minor flavor.

Lol, there is no actual chocolate in the so-called chocolate malts.

And there's a lot of flavors in various variety of wines and coffees that haven't come anywhere near them either. The roasting to make a chocolate malt imparts a particular color and aroma to the beer that a lighter grain does not.
 
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: Perknose
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.

Dopplebocks are typically brewed using chocolate malts which while not as blunt as dumping bakers chocolate in, does provide a bit of chocolate aroma and minor flavor.

Lol, there is no actual chocolate in the so-called chocolate malts.

And there's a lot of flavors in various variety of wines and coffees that haven't come anywhere near them either. The roasting to make a chocolate malt imparts a particular color and aroma to the beer that a lighter grain does not.

But it's NOT a chocolate taste and the use of the so-called chocolate malt, which has no chocolate in it, does NOT impart any "chocolate aroma and minor flavor", as you claim -- more of a sweet roasted nut taste.
 
Originally posted by: Perknose
OP, you seem to be implying that doppelbock has chocolate in it. It doesn't. But if it ends in "ator", it's a doppelbock alright.

As for beers brewed with chocolate, Young's Double Chocolate Stout is my personal favorite. It has a clear chocolate aftertaste.

It is, in fact, the ambrosia of the Gods, the elixir of the immortals, and the dessert of the discerning alcoholic.

yeah, I realized that some might read my post as referencing Sam Adams Double Bock as also being a chocolate beer. However, I was merely using it, also a beer I just recently had the opportunity to purchase, as a means of comparison for the review - it being a lighter-bodied 9% ABV beer as well.

And with that in mind - both brews are far better than Old Rasputin's Imperial Ale, also a 9% ABV brew - however, they are also different styles of beer. Well, all three are different. 😉

But yes, I understand Bock's aren't chocolate beers. 😉

 
Aside from the various Rogue offerings I haven't delved much into chocolate-themed beers.

I have had chocolate grappa, though. I consider it the only possible way to palate that horrendous devil juice.

 
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Rogue Chocolate Stout is pretty good, but not something you'd want a lot of at one time. The chocolate taste isn't overdone, not too sweet. I don't like sweet beers at all.

Came in to post this.

DH has some great beers, especially their 90 minute. I'd love to give this a try, their west coast market penetration has improved drastically over the years.
 
I've had Brooklyn's before. Tried it with a scoop of vanilla ice cream as well; it was surprisingly tasty.
 
Originally posted by: scott916
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Rogue Chocolate Stout is pretty good, but not something you'd want a lot of at one time. The chocolate taste isn't overdone, not too sweet. I don't like sweet beers at all.

Came in to post this.

DH has some great beers, especially their 90 minute. I'd love to give this a try, their west coast market penetration has improved drastically over the years.

Heh, I was a little worried about trying the Theobroma. My last encounter with Dogfish Head was when I bought some of the 60 Minute IPA, and well... I was not amused with my distaste for 5 remaining bottles.
I actually think I'm just not a fan of IPAs, I've tried 2 different ones now, and while both were disgusting, I guess at least it was good that the DH's 60 Minute didn't taste like Pinesol, the other IPA I tried couldn't escape that perfect description.

But I must say, Theobroma was perfectly crafted. I'm going to have to try some other Dogfish Head beers... I just need to stay away from their IPAs. I think I just don't like a hoppy beer. Almost every beer I've enjoyed are described by their malt character...
 
Back
Top