- Aug 22, 2011
- 8,232
- 2
- 0
You are missing one vital statistic for your opinion. The masses are idiots. Factor that in and get back to us![]()
Well not missing, just underestimating them it appears. I tend to do that sometimes with idiots. My bad.
You are missing one vital statistic for your opinion. The masses are idiots. Factor that in and get back to us![]()
You are missing one vital statistic for your opinion. The masses are idiots. Factor that in and get back to us![]()
This. When I was younger, I was confused as to why people would by products based off of commercials that had nothing to do with the product. Later on I realized that marketing teams know that America is full of a bunch of dumbasses. It is very easy to manipulate the masses.
Seems like a smart move on their part. From what I read in the article they claim only a small percentage of their ingredients are impacted by this, so it could be a case where it costs them little to do and they get a big PR benefit.
I 100% agree that the anti-GMO movement is bullshit, but that doesn't mean they aren't making a smart move here.
My main concern is secondary to GMOs being used. I don't believe they have any type of health effect or are dangerous in and of themselves. My issue is the reduction in food choice. GMOs are specifically engineered for profitability above all else, taste be damned. Because GMOs are specifically engineered, it takes thousands of man hours and millions of dollars to develop and produce one type of seed. For this reason, variety is immensely limited.
Those seeds then flood the market and are, by their very nature, cheaper to sow, harvest, and ship to the store. Sweet corn from walmart tastes like garbage, sweet corn out of my neighbor's garden is heaven. It is sad to not have the food choice nor the quality that people used to have.
Another side effect is crop susceptibility to disease. With only a few number of seeds available, there has been concern for one disease for that one type of plant to wipe out a massive quantity of our agricultural production. That is, of course, a doomsday scenario that isn't likely to happen but it does open us up to risk.
For me though, it is mainly taste and the concern for food variety in the future. Without the small time mills like Anson Mills in the south keeping certain heirloom varieties alive, we would only have really bland tasting factory produce. Have you guys tried a tomato from the grocery recently? Tragic!![]()
My main concern is secondary to GMOs being used. I don't believe they have any type of health effect or are dangerous in and of themselves. My issue is the reduction in food choice. GMOs are specifically engineered for profitability above all else, taste be damned. Because GMOs are specifically engineered, it takes thousands of man hours and millions of dollars to develop and produce one type of seed. For this reason, variety is immensely limited.
Those seeds then flood the market and are, by their very nature, cheaper to sow, harvest, and ship to the store. Sweet corn from walmart tastes like garbage, sweet corn out of my neighbor's garden is heaven. It is sad to not have the food choice nor the quality that people used to have.
Another side effect is crop susceptibility to disease. With only a few number of seeds available, there has been concern for one disease for that one type of plant to wipe out a massive quantity of our agricultural production. That is, of course, a doomsday scenario that isn't likely to happen but it does open us up to risk.
For me though, it is mainly taste and the concern for food variety in the future. Without the small time mills like Anson Mills in the south keeping certain heirloom varieties alive, we would only have really bland tasting factory produce. Have you guys tried a tomato from the grocery recently? Tragic!![]()
Do you know of any other GMO produce besides the Walmart corn that you can buy at the grocery store?
Your conclusions seem to be based off of severely limited data. Walmart corn taste like crap so therefore its because of GMO and GMO produce tastes like crap appears to be your conclusion. You ever stop to think of the possibility that the corn you got was just not great tasting that day? Happens all the time here, and I live in Iowa so there's plenty of corn to go around.
And why would GMOs, most which are specifically engineered for disease resistance, be anymore susceptible to your little disease scenario? If a disease affects a certain crop, generally speaking, it affects that entire crop, GMO or no GMO.
I would agree about the crappy taste of a lot of produce. We can get decent tomatoes in NYC at various farmers markets in the summer and they are amazing. (my family used to grow our own back in PA when I was growing up too) All you need to do is slice them up, put on a little pepper and maybe a little vinegar... the best.
Walmart corn was one example. Not the extent of my knowledge. Do you really believe the only GMO food I have ever tasted and compared is walmart corn? Come on now, debate my points don't try to weasel an argument out of tiny stuff like that.
And engineered for disease resistance? Sure, so is the same with our antibiotics, but those pesky little buggers always seem to find a way around them. Put all your production behind a very limited number of seeds and it exposes us to disease. I guess we need to put our faith into the profiteering engineers.I'm certainly not saying it will happen, it is a cursory effect of having engineered seeds. We simply can not have the variety that we do in nature.
Again, why would GMO be more susceptible to disease? You stated that GMO's are somehow adding to disease susceptibility. Please back that claim up.
I think that's based on the perception that there would be a lack of genetic diversity.
I don't know how much of a concern that is, though, given most commercial farmers don't plant from seed crop anymore.
I think that's based on the perception that there would be a lack of genetic diversity.
I don't know how much of a concern that is, though, given most commercial farmers don't plant from seed crop anymore.
What other GMO produce have you tasted? Answer my question please.
Again, why would GMO be more susceptible to disease? You stated that GMO's are somehow adding to disease susceptibility. Please back that claim up.
You are serious? I need to explain why heirloom produce tastes better than some GMOs? I can't believe you are still going down that path. It is generally accepted. Move along. If you'd like, taste any produce out of Kroger/Walmart/Publix/etc that isn't locally sourced and then compare it to anything in a typical family garden or the farmer's market. I live in Southern IL and own farm leases, LOL I know my produce
As another poster pointed out and I've already said, lower number of diversity in the agriculture system means a single failure point could wipe out an entire harvest cycle. Its a risk analysis issue. We used to plant hundreds of types of corn. If one type happened to be susceptible to disease that year, then it didn't really matter as a whole because there were hundreds of other types that made it through the harvest season. Now we only have a few varieties of corn, so if one type happens to be susceptible to disease that year then it could have the potential to wipe out a vast majority of the corn yield that year. We open ourselves up to risk when we plant only a few types.
I would generally say some humility is in order when trying to figure out if marketing works on you or not. Chances are in some ways it does. We all like to think we're too smart to be affected by that bullshit but we probably are and don't even know it.
My neighbor also grows the best tomatoes. Wow. So red and juicy. I slice them with a little salt and pepper. I'll need to try your vinegar trick this summer. :thumbsup:
ROFL. Thanks for the information. All I can do is point and laugh at those customers. smh
I would generally say some humility is in order when trying to figure out if marketing works on you or not. Chances are in some ways it does. We all like to think we're too smart to be affected by that bullshit but we probably are and don't even know it.
The problem with GMO is unintended consequences. Those consequences could be health side effects or they could be something like a loss of flavor.
I found this story to be a good read and it reminded me of other foods that have been modified that I used to love to eat but seem to have lost their flavor (corn on the cob for example).
http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/why-nothing-especially-chicken-tastes-like-it-used-to/
And what unintended side effects have arisen in the 20 years have appeared? The precautionary principle is nice, but people are using it as a club and no scientific evidence to support their anti-biotech position.
Are you aware of a scientific process that can determine taste?
And what GMOs have caused a loss in taste? The only ones readily available to consumers are corn and papaya.