Chinese County Massacres 50,000 Dogs

Brutuskend

Lifer
Apr 2, 2001
26,558
4
0
Chinese County Massacres 50,000 Dogs
By CHRISTOPHER BODEEN, Associated Press Writer
5 hours ago

SHANGHAI, China - A county in southwestern China has killed as many as 50,000 dogs in a government campaign ordered after three people died from rabies, official media reported Tuesday.

The five-day massacre in Yunnan province's Mouding county spared only military guard dogs and police canine units, the Shanghai Daily reported, citing local media.

Dogs being walked were taken from their owners and beaten on the spot, the newspaper said. Other killing teams entered villages at night, creating noise to get dogs barking, then honing in and beating them to death.

Owners were offered 63 cents per animal to kill their dogs before the teams were sent in, the report said.

The massacre was widely discussed on the Internet, with both legal scholars and animal rights activists criticizing it as crude and cold-blooded. The World Health Organization said more emphasis needed to be placed on prevention.

"Wiping out the dogs shows these government officials didn't do their jobs right in protecting people from rabies in the first place," Legal Daily, a newspaper run by the central government's Politics and Law Committee, said in an editorial in its online edition.

Dr. Francette Dusan, a WHO expert on diseases passed from animals to people, said effective rabies control required coordinated efforts between human and animal health agencies and authorities.

"This has not been pursued adequately to date in China with most control efforts consisting of purely reactive dog culls," Dusan said.

The Shanghai Daily said 360 of Mouding county's 200,000 residents suffered dog bites this year. The three rabies victims included a 4-year-old girl, the report said.

"With the aim to keep this horrible disease from people, we decided to kill the dogs," Li Haibo, a spokesman for the county government was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency.

Calls to county government offices rang unanswered on Tuesday.

China has seen a major rise in the number of rabies cases in recent years, with 2,651 reported deaths from the disease in 2004, the last year for which data was available, according to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Experts have tied the rise in part to an increase in dog ownership, particularly in rural areas where about 70 percent of households keep dogs. Only about 3 percent of Chinese dogs are vaccinated against rabies, according to the center. Access to appropriate treatment is highly limited, especially in the countryside.

 

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
30,360
681
126
They actually took pets from owners and beat them to death in front of the owners? Bastards :thumbsdown:
 

Kalmah

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2003
3,692
1
76
Right... so if a new disease arrises in China... we just kill all the Chinese.... Got it.

What the hell is wrong with people. This makes me sick. :disgust:
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:
 

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
According to the Chinese gov't, it was a glorious victory over rabies, not a "massacre."
 

Kalmah

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2003
3,692
1
76
Originally posted by: Mucho
Sad but necessary

I wouldn't say necessary. How about they make a deadline for all animals to have a rabies shot... dog gets rabies shot, dog gets a special 'token' to hang on their collar.

After deadline, you see a dog without the 'token' hooked to collar, you call animal control.
Very easy.

 

Stifko

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 1999
4,799
2
81
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:


Sure we can be concerned w/multiple things at the same time, but in the grand scheme of things, is a dog's life more significant than a human being's?
 

Kalmah

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2003
3,692
1
76
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:


Sure we can be concerned w/multiple things at the same time, but in the grand scheme of things, is a dog's life more significant than a human being's?

Yes, humans tend to p!ss me off more often.

 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,615
6,493
126
wow that is fvcking terrible. if someone came in my house and beat my dog infront of me i would have to fvck him up big time ... BBIIGG time. i woudn't worry about what they would do back to me until after they already did it. i just couldnt sit there and watch that ******.

and wtf ... beat em to death? yah very humane.
 

Zysoclaplem

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2003
8,799
0
0
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:


Sure we can be concerned w/multiple things at the same time, but in the grand scheme of things, is a dog's life more significant than a human being's?

Depends on who you are asking.
Life is important regardless.
 

Thraxen

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2001
4,683
1
81
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:


Sure we can be concerned w/multiple things at the same time, but in the grand scheme of things, is a dog's life more significant than a human being's?

Again, what does that have to do with being concerned about this? In effect he was saying we should pick a single top priority to be concerned about and forget all else. That's just ridiculous.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,615
6,493
126
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.

Ummm... WTF does that have to do with this? Can't you be concerned about multiple things at the same time :confused:


Sure we can be concerned w/multiple things at the same time, but in the grand scheme of things, is a dog's life more significant than a human being's?

50,000 dogs lives are probably more significant than 3 human lives in this case. go ask the 50,000 dog owners how they feel about it?
 

Kalmah

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2003
3,692
1
76
Originally posted by: purbeast0
wow that is fvcking terrible. if someone came in my house and beat my dog infront of me i would have to fvck him up big time ... BBIIGG time. i woudn't worry about what they would do back to me until after they already did it. i just couldnt sit there and watch that ******.

and wtf ... beat em to death? yah very humane.

I wonder if anybody actually did fight back? I know I would.

 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Are 50K dogs > 1 human life?
Out of 50K dogs, how many actually had rabies?

When other countries kill 2 or 3 million cows because one or two may have Mad Cow disease, nobody complains because this is the only way they can cope with the problem.

Rural Chinese live in extreme poverty and can barely feed themselves. Spending money on dogs is out of the question. They cope with the problem the only way they can.
I would have been hiding my dogs and dressing up my cats as dogs.
 

PAB

Banned
Dec 4, 2002
1,719
1
0
The "horror" people experience is simple culture shock.

Westerners place a very high value on pets, whereas other cultures do not. When stuff like this happens, the chinese shrug and say "no big deal" and everyone else in the world says "HOW THE HELL DO YOU THINK LIKE THAT?"

 
Jun 19, 2004
10,860
1
81
Originally posted by: michaels
People should be more concerned with the human right's violations.



I'm pretty sure it's a violation of my human rights if some government comes, takes my dog, then kills it in front of me. Abuse to animals isn't the only thing going on here. If you can't see the "human rights violations" here then you're a blind moron.