• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Chicago Teacher in Teen Sex Bust

faenix

Platinum Member
link

She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?

What has this world come to. :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: faenix
link

She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?

What has this world come to. :disgust:

I wouldn't F her for $5k.



You would if you were a horny 15 year old 😉

Ausm
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: faenix
link

She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?

What has this world come to. :disgust:

I wouldn't F her for $5k.

Read the arrest reports.. she paid 5 G's to put her mouth on their "private parts"...

Too bad she doesn't like 'em older or she could have made money doing that instead.
 
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.

I say, if a male teacher would be ruined over sexual abuse charges, then the same should happen to a female teacher. If the sexes were reversed, then the girl in question, for sure, would be labelled a "victim", therefore its fair game. No double standards.
 
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?

This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.
This is statutory rape, do you think that's ok? Replace the teacher for a man, and the victims for girls, now is it ok?
 
Back
Top