Originally posted by: faenix
link
She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?
What has this world come to. :disgust:
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: faenix
link
She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?
What has this world come to. :disgust:
I wouldn't F her for $5k.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: faenix
link
She looks half decent. Why in the world would she pay $5,000 for three 15-16 year olds?
What has this world come to. :disgust:
I wouldn't F her for $5k.
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?
This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.
Originally posted by: ArmchairAthlete
She's fugly. Especially compared to that last teacher, yea.
This is statutory rape, do you think that's ok? Replace the teacher for a man, and the victims for girls, now is it ok?Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I like how they called the teenage boys "victims". So tell me, who was "hurt" or "victimized" by this crime?
This is simply legislation of morality, nothing more.