Charlie Kirk and Deplorable’s get their feelz hurt.....again

Feb 4, 2009
34,553
15,766
136
Big time conservative PAC dude gets banned from twitter after being warned about spreading false voter infomation/false or poorly worded voting fraud descriptions.


**pop up warning**



Straw that broke the camels back appears to be Kirk saying “man sends in 11 ballots” where the report was “man requests 11 ballots”. Before anyone says it I agree it is a trivial mistake but an important mistake. Particularly for someone of Kirks prominence. Particularly if you have been warned about spreading false voter information.

Appears Kirk is taking it like a Man

conservative “news” sites not so much


.......and Matt cried


Amazing how all the tough guys have learned from the President to complain, whine and cry for attention. Matt do you need a hug? You are smart and special, always remember that.
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,553
15,766
136
If they can’t post lies and fake news what else do you expect conservatives to do on social media platforms? Argue their positions on the merits?

here’s the thing, his mistake is minor. He has a record of minor mistakes and this is the guy who was paying kids to tweet pro trump stuff.
I know if I were in charge of major decisions at Twitter by now I’d be pretty tired of this guy shitting on the floor because that is what he is doing, walking around twitter and shitting on the floor.
Sorry sir I am tied of picking up your shit. You need to go somewhere else to shit on the floor.
 
Last edited:

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
62,843
11,255
136
I keep telling the righties...if they don't like the way teitter and facebook treat them...they should go start their own social media sites where they can post all the lies, half-truths, and russian propaganda they want.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
he changed applications to ballots. those aren't the same thing. they aren't the same thing at all. that's intentional on his part, and it's not a small or trivial mistake. the whole point is to sow doubt in the outcome of the election. he's running a fucking psy-op campaign and he can get fucked.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,856
4,974
126
here’s the thing, his mistake is minor. He has a record of minor mistakes and this is the guy who was paying kids to tweet pro trump stuff.
I know if I were in charge of major decisions at Twitter by now I’d be pretty tired of this guy shitting on the floor because that is what he is doing, walking around twitter and shitting on the floor.
Sorry sir I am tied of picking up your shit. You need to go somewhere else to shit on the floor.

His mistakes aren't "minor" and they aren't" "mistakes" either.
He (and others of his ilk) know exactly what they are doing/saying, how they are doing/saying it and what the attempted impact of what they do/say is hoped to be.
They aren't "dumb"... they are quite strategic but with dumb ideas.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,514
2,713
136
It's like Perdue purposely mispronouncing Kamala Harris, admitting that he did so on purpose, then having his publicist try to spin it as a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo
Feb 4, 2009
34,553
15,766
136
His mistakes aren't "minor" and they aren't" "mistakes" either.
He (and others of his ilk) know exactly what they are doing/saying, how they are doing/saying it and what the attempted impact of what they do/say is hoped to be.
They aren't "dumb"... they are quite strategic but with dumb ideas.

I chose poor words. My point was yeah for you or I that is a minor mistake. For a professional (this Kirk guy certainly is a political professional) that is a sloppy mistake. He should be held to a higher standard than some random YouTuber.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homerboy

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,070
23,942
136
As usual, it's not about free speech — it's about forcing the modern conservative narrative on others no matter how false or hateful it might be.
Just like same sex marriage is somehow an attack on the religious liberty of conservative Christians to impose their views on the rest of society as stated by two of the worst justices in history.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,538
7,672
136
Collaborators and tra
Just like same sex marriage is somehow an attack on the religious liberty of conservative Christians to impose their views on the rest of society as stated by two of the worst justices in history.
For the cultists, Freedom of Religion means Freedom for their chosen religion to create all the rules for everyone else.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,106
2,157
136
I keep telling the righties...if they don't like the way teitter and facebook treat them...they should go start their own social media sites where they can post all the lies, half-truths, and russian propaganda they want.


Parler. LOL


But Parler is quickly discovering the limits of free expression. On June 30, Matze used Parler to explain its house rules, apparently frustrated with some of Parler’s new users testing the limits of its free-expression motto by posting pornographic images and obscenities.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dawp

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,398
6,077
126
Funny how the free speech champions want to use the government to control how a private company runs its website.
Yes, criminally hilarious. Nobody should have a right to be so funny. It could put people in the hospital with stitches.
 

Hindsight_2020

Junior Member
Oct 20, 2020
16
28
46
Private Businesses; They Can Do Whatever They Want, Provided It Aligns With The Right's Views.
-GOP

And, before you get into the whole 'But the contradict-shuns!', the Right has always accepted, stated and follows contradictory views, behavior and actions.

More than happy to follow privacy, morals, justice, law & order - but, the person(s) jumping up and down over these things needs to follow as well.