IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,655
- 688
- 126
They are all different forms of outsourcing. What I'm getting at is, if you outsource the very bread and butter of your business, then why even be in that business in first place? Why bother running an IT company if you're just putting everything in the cloud?
Again, you’re thinking small. No one said “running an IT company.” “IT companies” make up a very small portion of companies. And even still, there are entire “IT companies” whose sole purpose is to consult on the use and implementation of cloud systems.
I’m a very senior architect who consults, and I’ve pushed hard for us to eliminate all of the offerings in my practice which result in an on-premise end state. It’s not worth our effort for the very few companies who want that and it’s not good advice to push on-premise end states outside very few use cases. On-premise costs more, isn’t as reliable, and has much more overhead in terms of tying up staff who could be doing much more important things.
There’a a reason most companies are moving in that direction, and the reason is simple: Massive cost savings. I used to be the biggest on-premise fan in the world but when you’re an experienced technical AND business person, you see that cloud is the best solution. You “wanting to be in control” doesn’t save your company tons of money every year, and the few tiny companies we talk with who are like that are generally clients we don’t pursue.
