Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Originally posted by: Naustica
Majority of Costco's profit comes from membership fees and not from selling of the merchandise.
...therefore they should be willing to take a loss on merchandise due to RMA abuse?
Seriously -- even the 'revised' policy is VERY generous. You have three months to check the product out and make sure it is what you really want. If it
breaks -- that's what the
warranty is for, and Costco even extends the manufacturer's warranty, something that is generally quite expensive at other stores.
Costco is a membership club. They have the option of revoking membership from people who abuse the RMA system and banning them from the store.
Okay, but if they join, buy a $2000 TV (but nothing else), then return it after a year or two for a $2000 credit, no questions asked? Sure, they can kick them out, or refuse any future returns -- but they're already way in the hole.
While I can't argue that their earlier return policy was awfully nice -- it's just way too easy to abuse on big-ticket electronics. That kind of draw is just irresistable to some people.
As for the loss on the merchandise, Costco has limited return allowance given by their vendors. It's part of the requirement to do business with Costco.
And if they have more items returned than their allowance, Costco eats the difference or has to try to liquidate them as open-box. This isn't rocket science.
If they were losing what they considered an unacceptable amount of money on returns like this, they really had only two options: 1) raise prices so they make more money to begin with, or 2) limit the return period on the items people are most likely to abuse it with. Given that they compete with a lot of other stores based on price, option 1 is not that attractive. I suppose they could also do things like prorating refunds on electronics -- so if, say, you return it after a year you only get half your money back. But then trying to figure out how to prorate everything fairly is a nightmare.
It's described as a 'satisfaction' guarantee. The point was not so that you could buy something, use it until it's obsolete (or you break it), and then suddenly decide you are 'unsatisfied' with the product and want your money back.