Originally posted by: Lemon law
Originally posted by: bamx2
I live in GA . This may sound odd but I voted for Obama and Chambliss ! . Why ? Obama was by far the better candidate for President . I voted for Chambliss for balance in the Senate and he is an ardent supporter of the Fair Tax (
www.fairtax.org ) .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all due respects bamx2, you evidently were not alone in your thinking. As Chambliss seeming made the 60 seat super majority into a cornerstone of his campaign.
But I very much wonder, even if Martin and Franken would have won, if the democrats would have had the party discipline to keep all of their members voting in lockstep.
And now we will see if the GOP will be able to keep their members all in the same lockstep they achieved in the last congress, a congress in which the GOP set new world records for the use of the filibuster. Which prevented the democrats from delivering the change the American people wanted when they voted in 11/2006.
But its not too hard to connect the dots and read the tea leaves from both the elections of November of 2006 and 2008. The GOP reward for gridlock has netted the GOP some negative 50 house seats and negative 13 or 14 Senate seats from those two elections. Or an 11.5% gain in the house and a 13 or 14% gain in the Senate.
And that gridlock basically only benefited GWB, who, as a lame duck in 2006, could not be a lasting investment come the election of 11/2008.