• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Challenge: How many five year olds can you take on at once?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Damn...after reading all these responses, I really have no idea now.

I think I'm gonna have to try this out

I also wouldn't mind being the guy who gets to train these little bastards to attack in groups.
 
I have an idea, clothesline the little fvckers! Take the shirts off the dead ones and use them to whip the kids with em (like towel whipping in the showers in movies, etc) They'll all start sh!tting bricks, then just grab them and hurl them into the walls. I'm pretty sure I could take on at least 100 of the little shiznats.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
This was posted at somethingawful. Definately worth repeating...

As I've had extensive training in midget combat manouvers (read, I worked at a daycare), I think I can succesfully take out at least 20-25 of the little buggers, provided they are not genetically enhanced (ADD). Then the figure goes down to about 15.

5 if they're retards.

hahahahahahahah
 
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Originally posted by: sheik124
I'd rip a dead one apart and make some numbchucks outta bones and ligaments

haha, thats a nice idea.

Except that it would take like 2 hours and he'd be bitten to death long before he completed the numbchucks.

I think this would be harder than it sounds, little kids have endless energy...and they outnumber you. When you start to get tired some are going to slip in close and bite you.
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Inspired by this SA thread:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1505284

This thread had me cackling at the mental imagery of taking on multiple 5 year olds in a battle royal 😀

Rules:

- You are in an enclosed area, roughly the size of a basketball court. There are no foreign objects.

- You are not allowed to touch a wall.

- When you are knocked unconscious, you lose. When they are all knocked unconscious, they lose. Once a kid is knocked unconscious, that kid is "out."

- I (or someone else intent on seeing to it you fail) get to choose the kids from a pool that is twice the size of your magic number. The pool will be 50/50 in terms of gender and will have no discernable abnormalities in terms of demographics, other than they are all healthy Americans.

- The kids receive one day of training from hand-to-hand combat experts who will train them specifically to team up to take down one adult. You will receive one hour of "counter-tactics" training.

- There is no protective padding for any combatant other than the standard-issue cup.

- The kids are motivated enough to not get scared, regardless of the bloodshed. Even the very last one will give it his/her best to take you down.


Been having this stupid fvcking debate with some friends and the answers vary wildly from 5 to 80. I am of the opinion that I could take around 40, no matter how well trained they are you can still run faster than them. My plan would be to run away to the other side of the room, wait for them to chase after me and kick 3 or 4 in the head. When they start to swarm, I run away again and repeat. If they managed to grab onto my legs so I couldn't run away I would start punching them in the top of the head or even banging heads together. I don't see how they could stop a kick to the head, and I can't imagine what someone would train them to do. Here are some 5-year olds for reference.

I think i could take 25 - 30 of them. Maybe more if i get in better cardiovascular shape.

I think I could probably punch kids in the head for a good solid 10 minutes before I was exhausted.. and have to sit down and take a brake... I should be able to kick them for a while to rest my arms.

So my estimate is probably around 100 or so. Just need to keep my nuts safe... and wear thick jeans to protect me from biting.

-Max
 
Realistically speaking I think it's possible for even 5-7 of them to take down most of you. One or two kicks in the DING will knock most down and have the rest stomping all over you. With the proper training, they'll know exactly where to hit. Sure anyone here can 'take down' a kid. But that'll have you on the ground as well leaving you vulnerable to a whole slew of attacks.
 
I'll try and analyze this realistically, esp. since I think so many of you are way, way off in estimating your "skills". 🙂

Let's say there's 10 of them (total weight would be around 400 lbs).

If they're trained to attack at once (assumed from their one hour), that means you could, maybe, take out 2 to 3 kids immediately during their rush -- and then you'd be overwhelmed by the 7 remaining kids with approx. 280 lbs wrapped around you, biting, scratching, etc.

How many of us could effectively fight with 250+ lbs of fighting kids all over us?

Maybe take out one or two more, but then fatigue (and damage) would be too much. Remember, they're trying to take you out too, so you have to assume some effectiveness on their part.

Just my opinion...oh, and I have some experience with large scale melee "fighting". I taught middle-school (computers and gym) for one year and let me tell you, the kids LOVED playing "tackle the teacher" in gym during field day and such -- esp. since they knew I wrestled in high school and college...and when 5 or 6 sixth grade boys start trying to whomp your ass -- it's pretty tough (although I could've taken them if I had to!) since I couldn't really fight back.

~AJ
 
I think the problem you run into is, they get a day of training and aren't going to be afraid.
So they aren't going to be concerned with self-preservation.

The way I fight the battle (as the leader of 5 year olds) is send a few 5 years old to dive at the knees/legs. Once you take the adult off his feet he is going to be easy. You can only dodge so many of those buggers before one gets lucky and takes you off your feet.

Low numbers, you could probably handle. But once you start cresting certain numbers (10?), all they have to do is throw waves at you. And eventually you will go down. And when that happens, they can completely swarm you. And you aren't giong to last long.


 
Originally posted by: Aj_UF
I'll try and analyze this realistically, esp. since I think so many of you are way, way off in estimating your "skills". 🙂

Let's say there's 10 of them (total weight would be around 400 lbs).

If they're trained to attack at once (assumed from their one hour), that means you could, maybe, take out 2 to 3 kids immediately during their rush -- and then you'd be overwhelmed by the 7 remaining kids with approx. 280 lbs wrapped around you, biting, scratching, etc.

How many of us could effectively fight with 250+ lbs of fighting kids all over us?

Maybe take out one or two more, but then fatigue (and damage) would be too much. Remember, they're trying to take you out too, so you have to assume some effectiveness on their part.

Just my opinion...oh, and I have some experience with large scale melee "fighting". I taught middle-school (computers and gym) for one year and let me tell you, the kids LOVED playing "tackle the teacher" in gym during field day and such -- esp. since they knew I wrestled in high school and college...and when 5 or 6 sixth grade boys start trying to whomp your ass -- it's pretty tough (although I could've taken them if I had to!) since I couldn't really fight back.

~AJ

Some good points there indeed the sheer weight involved would complicate things but some things to also keep in mind that would hinder such a large group.

1.)They are 5 so would be a clear intelligence advantage, show them all the tactics in the world but they won't be effective with them after only a day.. if they even remember.
2.) Given any quantity of individuals and assuming they will all follow "orders" or work 2gether .. as stated they are american so some will go against the training and try solo.
3.)Kids would be hard to fight as a parent but in this case we are allowed to truly hit so I know for me and most other males a single blow to the head would crush bone = knocked out.
4.)Height, reach would be a large factor in our favor as already stated the stick and move would work I would guess extremely well but would bring fatigue on more quickly.

So given the sheer weight and swarming ability I would say the rumble could result in very different endings depending on how everything went down. One or 2 grapplers could slow me up enough for the herd to catch up and that would not end so well.

Id say 50 on a good day given no suprises and they dont get me on the ground.
And if things went bad 20 if they dropped me b/c throwing them off would burn energy like a motha and if they have been trained they will be aiming for the nose to blur your vision. (with a cup the crotch wont be as easy a target).
 
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: Argo
Can I wear a cup?

did you read the OP?

Yes, after I made this post 🙂

To answer OPs question - I'd have to say 80-100. The trick would be to run as fast as you can and ram into them. You must never stop, because as soon as you do they can swarm you and then bite you to death.
 
Have you seen any 5 yr olds, actually stood next to them. They're friggin tiny. I could take 40-50. Afterall, you can only have so many around you at once and I do get to wear a cup, per the rules.

You have to think about the fear factor. Once you crush a few to death the rest will be so afraid it'd be gg.

Hence his comment on retards. They know no fear!!

I'm 5'10" and 180 lbs. Could probably break ribs/necks with a single kick. Punches would be used secondarily
 
i'd say easily 100.

Any blow i deliver would be damaging enough to put htem out of commision until I could return to deliver the kill shot.


I am quick for my size and have no problem snapping little necks, breaking legs, fingers, spines and skulls. I can easily choke one kid, while punching another and kicking another. So if I can take out 3 at a time. Scatter. Take out 3 more. Scatter. I'll be fine. I would shave my head and go shirtless. Maybe put a little baby oil on so they cannot hang on to anything.

I think i could go highter than 100 but I would begin to get fatigued.

No matter what training they had for one day. They are still 5 year olds and would lack the attention span to really capitalize on any training they recieved in just one day. There kicks and punches would like hurt them more than me.
 
Originally posted by: Aj_UF
I'll try and analyze this realistically, esp. since I think so many of you are way, way off in estimating your "skills". 🙂

Let's say there's 10 of them (total weight would be around 400 lbs).

If they're trained to attack at once (assumed from their one hour), that means you could, maybe, take out 2 to 3 kids immediately during their rush -- and then you'd be overwhelmed by the 7 remaining kids with approx. 280 lbs wrapped around you, biting, scratching, etc.

How many of us could effectively fight with 250+ lbs of fighting kids all over us?

Maybe take out one or two more, but then fatigue (and damage) would be too much. Remember, they're trying to take you out too, so you have to assume some effectiveness on their part.

Just my opinion...oh, and I have some experience with large scale melee "fighting". I taught middle-school (computers and gym) for one year and let me tell you, the kids LOVED playing "tackle the teacher" in gym during field day and such -- esp. since they knew I wrestled in high school and college...and when 5 or 6 sixth grade boys start trying to whomp your ass -- it's pretty tough (although I could've taken them if I had to!) since I couldn't really fight back.

~AJ
The average ATOTer is about 6', 110 lbs, and while your analysis may hold true for most of them, not all of us are weaker than women. Plus there's a big difference between 5 year olds and 5th/6th graders. A very limited number of 5 year olds can attack you simultaneously; there simply isn't enough leg/waist area for more than perhaps five or six. The head is a vulnerable area, and at ~3.5-4' in height their heads, unprotected as per the OP, would be in a preferable location for downward punching and elbow usage. I just can't see myself (6'1", 250) taking out less than 100-150 before becoming tired or succumbing to injuries.
 
well, since it's never going to happen, I say bring it on 🙂 I can take on as many as you can fit in the court.

I've coached 5 year old kids before. I say there is NO FREAKIN WAY you're going to get them to work together as a team to take down one adult (with one day of training). You're dreaming if you think otherwise. The concept of teamwork just isn't there in that age-group.
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Inspired by this SA thread:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1505284

This thread had me cackling at the mental imagery of taking on multiple 5 year olds in a battle royal 😀

Rules:

- You are in an enclosed area, roughly the size of a basketball court. There are no foreign objects.

- You are not allowed to touch a wall.

- When you are knocked unconscious, you lose. When they are all knocked unconscious, they lose. Once a kid is knocked unconscious, that kid is "out."

- I (or someone else intent on seeing to it you fail) get to choose the kids from a pool that is twice the size of your magic number. The pool will be 50/50 in terms of gender and will have no discernable abnormalities in terms of demographics, other than they are all healthy Americans.

- The kids receive one day of training from hand-to-hand combat experts who will train them specifically to team up to take down one adult. You will receive one hour of "counter-tactics" training.

- There is no protective padding for any combatant other than the standard-issue cup.

- The kids are motivated enough to not get scared, regardless of the bloodshed. Even the very last one will give it his/her best to take you down.


Been having this stupid fvcking debate with some friends and the answers vary wildly from 5 to 80. I am of the opinion that I could take around 40, no matter how well trained they are you can still run faster than them. My plan would be to run away to the other side of the room, wait for them to chase after me and kick 3 or 4 in the head. When they start to swarm, I run away again and repeat. If they managed to grab onto my legs so I couldn't run away I would start punching them in the top of the head or even banging heads together. I don't see how they could stop a kick to the head, and I can't imagine what someone would train them to do. Here are some 5-year olds for reference.

I think i could take 1 - 3 of them. Maybe more if i get in better cardiovascular shape.

Fixed.

 
Lots of good points BUT

Think of it this way...imagine one child wrapped around each of your limbs...you know, kids hanging off your leg where they sit on your feet, one each arm...it would be like trying to fight with 40 lbs of weights on every limb! Haven't any of you guys played with nieces and nephews? They do this without any training, so 4 trained kids could practically imbolize you while 6 others were trying to gouge your eyes out!

Granted, could they fight coordinated? Hey, why not in this hypothetical situation? 😉

IF they could do that, heck, even one kid per leg and you'd be screwed pretty quickly.

While you were trying to dislodge them, you'd be overwhelmed.

~AJ
 
Back
Top