LOL_Wut_Axel
Diamond Member
The study of economics includes the concept of intangible losses.
The point---------------------------->you
The only thing they lost is a potential customer.
The study of economics includes the concept of intangible losses.
How can I trust them not to however?
The point---------------------------->you
The only thing they lost is a potential customer.
The point---------------------------->you
The only thing they lost is a potential customer.
The point---------------------------->you
The only thing they lost is a potential customer.
You can't. That's the point. If they find out you make more the $XXX a year, they'll decide it's ok to shaft you too.
And that potential customer's monthly fee. Which suddenly became a tangible loss.
LOL...? Pretty sure you forgot the part about him putting the cable line to not pay them. He wasn't gonna be a customer in the first place. Are you really this dumb?
Also, I suggest some of you here read what "stealing" actually means. Nothing has been taken away from no one.
1
a : to take or appropriate without right or leave and with intent to keep or make use of wrongfully <stole a car> b : to take away by force or unjust means <they've stolen our liberty> c : to take surreptitiously or without permission <steal a kiss> d : to appropriate to oneself or beyond one's proper share : make oneself the focus of <steal the show>
2
a : to move, convey, or introduce secretly : smuggle b : to accomplish in a concealed or unobserved manner <steal a visit>
3
a : to seize, gain, or win by trickery, skill, or daring <a basketball player adept at stealing the ball> <stole the election> b of a base runner : to reach (a base) safely solely by running and usually catching the opposing team off guard
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/steal
Don't see anything about "tangible" in there. Do you?
He's just trying to justify his own thievery, I'm sure.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/steal
Don't see anything about "tangible" in there. Do you?
He's just trying to justify his own thievery, I'm sure.
Yes, I do. Everywhere. Stealing is taking away a property or a good. Nothing has been taken away, moron. Maybe you need to read what you linked.
Hurr hurr. I don't have any actual argument, so I'll make a stupid one-liner. BTW, I've bought most of what I have, including software (cheaper for college students :awe🙂. Movies, most. Music, some Since almost none of the music goes to the artists most of the time, I go to concerts and support them that way instead.
Also, you may want to learn what a "thief" is.
Well, I pay $60 a month for what they get for free.
I pay $700+ a year for my cable. If somebody stole a $700 television from a Best Buy, I bet you guys wouldn't be saying the same thing.
You should tell Time Warner, OP. Imagine if some guy that knew we were being fed bad information about Iraq had told someone: we wouldn't have invaded Iraq. Imagine if you saw a little girl getting into a car that matched the description from an Amber alert.
The people saying "don't snitch" are the people that stood by and did nothing while the holocaust took place in Europe. Remember, all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
He's not stealing. He's not taking away anything tangible.
It doesn't affect anyone else using the service, so why bother? If he he gets caught, he gets caught.
it can do, it can put noise back on the network screwing up other peoples service.
edit
--
just to say, i don't agree it's stealing either (same as with piracy). it's a potential loss, not an actual one with no real way of knowing if he would have taken the service out or not.
still, i wouldn't snitch as it's a cable company affected - UNLESS - i was a customer in which case this could affect my service in which case F my neighbour
oh and ps? it's not stealing. stealing deprives someone of something and going down this road takes you on the same pointless path as saying piracy is stealing. you won't win - whatever side you're on
THEFT OF SERVICE. (a) A person commits theft of service if, with intent to avoid payment for service that he knows is provided only for compensation:
(a) having control over the disposition of services of another to which he is not entitled, he intentionally or knowingly diverts the other's services to his own benefit or to the benefit of another not entitled to them;
if i saw someone being mugged i'd like to think i would interfere as the person may not be a bad guy (victim i mean). but in so far as cable companies go? they're companies. they do evil overall, not good
it's not my place or my responsibility to interfere with this. it's not like cable companies are charities and do good. no one has love for them
if i saw someone being mugged i'd like to think i would interfere as the person may not be a bad guy (victim i mean). but in so far as cable companies go? they're companies. they do evil overall, not good
oh and ps? it's not stealing. stealing deprives someone of something and going down this road takes you on the same pointless path as saying piracy is stealing. you won't win - whatever side you're on
it can do, it can put noise back on the network screwing up other peoples service.
edit
--
just to say, i don't agree it's stealing either (same as with piracy). it's a potential loss, not an actual one with no real way of knowing if he would have taken the service out or not.
still, i wouldn't snitch as it's a cable company affected - UNLESS - i was a customer in which case this could affect my service in which case F my neighbour
Its THEFT OF SERVICE.
Nearly all jurisdictions define THEFT OF SERVICE as:
by your comment, i find you as a bad guy... so under your definition, if someone takes something from you, it's not theft or stealing, as you do evil overall.
🙄
It's the first time I hear about it introducing "noise" to the network, TBH.