Carter Accuses Jewish Group of ?Slander? After Questioning Controversial Book

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Instead of pasting some 10 page essay and saying 'you're wrong" why dont you give us some clifs.

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Oh to bad the most vile terrorist leader was getting pushed into a corner. After all the media propaganda swirled out by the PLO on how the Israelis are killing and pushing into innocent lebanon back in the 80's I dont mind Arafat getting a taste of his own medicine.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: Vich
Instead of pasting some 10 page essay and saying 'you're wrong" why dont you give us some clifs.

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Oh to bad the most vile terrorist leader was getting pushed into a corner. After all the media propaganda swirled out by the PLO on how the Israelis are killing and pushing into innocent lebanon back in the 80's I dont mind Arafat getting a taste of his own medicine.

Whatever. The article basically says that this whole "Israel offered the Palestinians everything and they refused" is a myth that was invented by the Israeli/Jewish propoganda machine at the time.
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Vich
Instead of pasting some 10 page essay and saying 'you're wrong" why dont you give us some clifs.

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Oh to bad the most vile terrorist leader was getting pushed into a corner. After all the media propaganda swirled out by the PLO on how the Israelis are killing and pushing into innocent lebanon back in the 80's I dont mind Arafat getting a taste of his own medicine.

Whatever. The article basically says that this whole "Israel offered the Palestinians everything and they refused" is a myth that was invented by the Israeli/Jewish propoganda machine at the time.


Ah ok propoganda. I hope foreigners dont believe everything they read in the New York Times.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Vich
Instead of pasting some 10 page essay and saying 'you're wrong" why dont you give us some clifs.

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Oh to bad the most vile terrorist leader was getting pushed into a corner. After all the media propaganda swirled out by the PLO on how the Israelis are killing and pushing into innocent lebanon back in the 80's I dont mind Arafat getting a taste of his own medicine.

here are a few facts I have posted again and again

from
http://www.mideastweb.org/campdavid2.htm

Now tell me if you get back to reality, is that a viable state?
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Carter is an idiot. He seems a good chunk of posters here who would like nothing more than to see Israel destroyed to protect the people of Palestine and there obvious contribution to society they have made.

I am personally glad he is probally ruined over this.

he isn't ruined in my eyes. the situation just shows that pro-Israeli factions are very bit as inflexible as are supporters of the armed palestinian struggle. it's my way or the highway. accusing this man of racism or being an anti-semite is beyond the pale. Since when is criticism of the Israeli state to be equated with racism.
 

LEDominator

Senior member
May 31, 2006
388
0
76
Please explain to me how this Wall is a "temporary security fence"? Not that I approve of everything the Palestinians do, but I think it is obvious that Israel is purposely building a wall to get a land grab and make their state bigger.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Carter is an idiot filled with hate.

His book is a farce. 15 people resigned from his organization because of that book.

He wants to be seen as greatest peacemaker that ever was yet all he has done recently is fouled things up. He screwed us when he went to North Korea without Clinton's knowledge, he's screwed millions by certifying valid the elections of dictators worldwide (is there one he doesn't like?), and he's not doing the Palestinian and Israeli issue any good as well.




 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
So, what's the problem with the offer?
In the long run they will get control of 90% of the West Bank, so considering where they were ten years prior to the offer, that's quite a lot.
Beggars can't be choosers, and demanding a fully sovreign state after years of terrorism (still ongoing) is just unrealistic -- kinda like the illegal immigrants in the USA demanding amnesty.

As for the wall, it can always be removed, and for the moment it appears to be fairly effective.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Originally posted by: brandonb
Originally posted by: RichardE
I am personally glad he is probally ruined over this.

This attitude is exactly why Jew's have historically been hated by many different people since the dawn of time, including Palestinians. With Jews so eager to ruin others who don't agree/accept them and their ways. It's no wonder there is conflict surrounding them.

Jews were picked on throughout history because they held to their beliefs and that isolationism made it easy for leaders of countries with serious problems to come up with scapegoats.

Your attitude is ignorant and your a bigot
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Shivetya, that jokester doesn't even know a little bit of history to realize his assertion is false.
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: brandonb
Originally posted by: RichardE
I am personally glad he is probally ruined over this.

This attitude is exactly why Jew's have historically been hated by many different people since the dawn of time, including Palestinians. With Jews so eager to ruin others who don't agree/accept them and their ways. It's no wonder there is conflict surrounding them.

Jews were picked on throughout history because they held to their beliefs and that isolationism made it easy for leaders of countries with serious problems to come up with scapegoats.

Your attitude is ignorant and your a bigot


Ingore brandonb he has proved in this thread he knows absolutely nothing.

Some 'jew' must have beat him in a spelling b in 4th grade. :D
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Quotes that pretty much sum up the argument-

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Carter is an idiot filled with hate.

Carter is an idiot.

The far left is preaching hate and is instigating another mass witch hunt.

Amazingly Carter is a hero to many on the left who think his approach to North Korea and Palestine are the right way to go. He is the number one advocate of appeasement in the country right now. Just give the dictators whatever they want and the dictators will behave.

Carter is a deranged nutjob, he should go join the socialist party in Venezuela.

President Carter seems to be a little loopy on this subject.

Basically, the defenders of Israel are well entrenched and well indoctrinated, completely partisan and willing to do whatever it takes to defend their position. Name-calling and denial are the standard tools, with willful ignorance being the driving force...

They'll not be convinced in any way- but they're not the whole audience, by any stretch of the imagination. Which is why they're denouncing Carter so strongly- they want to maintain media dominance, shape and control the flow of information to their liking, as they've done for the last 60 years...

And this-

Hmm, a long time since I've seen this canned response of yours.
Too bad that Arabs and Jews living side by side in Haifa invalidate all your insinuations.
Nice try though -- at least you got to yammer about the Arayan Nation again.

Israelis are content to have a small and highly manageable minority of Arabs in their nation, as is the case in Haifa, where Jews are 90%. That's not the case in the whole of Palestine, however, where Arabs constitute at least 40% of the population. And Israelis are intent on maintaining the "Jewishness" of their society, pretty much through any means short of mass murder.

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/24511.html
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,221
654
126
Originally posted by: Lemon law
to Vich,

who wrote---Im sorry I cant understand what you just wrote.

If you don't understand the right to return---then you know exactly nothing about the mid-east.

Just a question, Lemon - do you know how to use the quote button? It would make your posts a lot easier to read.
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,221
654
126
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: Vich
You are ignoring what points this thread is making. We are arguing the points posted in the 2nd response. All those facts are accurate and carter is totally ignoring them..
I've actually taken the time to hear Carter speak on this, and I agree with him. It has nothing to do with the fact that Palestinian attacks on Israel have been monstrous. The fact is, the Israelis have their own full baggage load of unwarranted and inhumane aggression against the Palestinians. Aside from those facts, the one thing that stands out is, Israel continues to get a pass from the U.S. on their wrongs that the Palestinians don't.

I have no illusions that the Palestinians are innocent in this. It's sad, and it's tragic, but that mess will never be settled as long as both sides continue their aggression and dishonesty, and we don't stand of being able to act as honest brokers until we'er willing to call Israel on their own aggression.

I'm Jewish and wish there was no violence between the people living in that region of the world, but it's important to remember that the US chooses it's allies based on political alignment and allegiance. There is little reason for this country to support the Palestinians over the Israelis. Don't expect that to change any time soon.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Israelis are content to have a small and highly manageable minority of Arabs in their nation, as is the case in Haifa, where Jews are 90%. That's not the case in the whole of Palestine, however, where Arabs constitute at least 40% of the population. And Israelis are intent on maintaining the "Jewishness" of their society, pretty much through any means short of mass murder.

Living side by side is still living side by side, unlike the rest of the middle east. An Arab can live and wander freely in Haifa without being lynched.

Damn, you just won't quit your agitproping. "mass murder" -- don't make me laugh.

Also, I'm not surprised you had nothing to say about the infallible Carter refusing to debate his book; I guess for him it's more about monologues than dialogues.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn

Basically, the defenders of Israel are well entrenched and well indoctrinated, completely partisan and willing to do whatever it takes to defend their position. Name-calling and denial are the standard tools, with willful ignorance being the driving force...

They'll not be convinced in any way- but they're not the whole audience, by any stretch of the imagination. Which is why they're denouncing Carter so strongly- they want to maintain media dominance, shape and control the flow of information to their liking, as they've done for the last 60 years...

Carter is being denounced for publishing a book full of falsehoods that even some of his longest admirers shake their heads over. He even plagarized maps for his book.

Hate to break it to you, the other side is as much engaged in name calling and partisan as well. Do you have friends who live in Israel or been there? If so, ask them what they think. The people of Arab descent living in Israel are fine, its the nut cases outside that cause the problems.

Palestinians are having their problems because of their idiot leadership which itself is funded by countries who want Israel gone. They are indoctrinated from school age to hate Jews. How can you be reasonable with an unreasonable foe?

Besides, Carter went off the deep end in the 90s, he screwed Clinton over royally with that crap he pulled in North Korea.

 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Quotes that pretty much sum up the argument-

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Carter is an idiot filled with hate.

Carter is an idiot.

The far left is preaching hate and is instigating another mass witch hunt.

Amazingly Carter is a hero to many on the left who think his approach to North Korea and Palestine are the right way to go. He is the number one advocate of appeasement in the country right now. Just give the dictators whatever they want and the dictators will behave.

Carter is a deranged nutjob, he should go join the socialist party in Venezuela.

President Carter seems to be a little loopy on this subject.

Basically, the defenders of Israel are well entrenched and well indoctrinated, completely partisan and willing to do whatever it takes to defend their position. Name-calling and denial are the standard tools, with willful ignorance being the driving force...

They'll not be convinced in any way- but they're not the whole audience, by any stretch of the imagination. Which is why they're denouncing Carter so strongly- they want to maintain media dominance, shape and control the flow of information to their liking, as they've done for the last 60 years...

And this-

Hmm, a long time since I've seen this canned response of yours.
Too bad that Arabs and Jews living side by side in Haifa invalidate all your insinuations.
Nice try though -- at least you got to yammer about the Arayan Nation again.

Israelis are content to have a small and highly manageable minority of Arabs in their nation, as is the case in Haifa, where Jews are 90%. That's not the case in the whole of Palestine, however, where Arabs constitute at least 40% of the population. And Israelis are intent on maintaining the "Jewishness" of their society, pretty much through any means short of mass murder.

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/24511.html

How absolutely stupid are you? The jews fight to survive on there tiny slip of land, and you continue to point fingers at them as if they are the perpetrators? How about the 2000billion Muslims surrounding them who are blowing up themselves, their mothers, and their children to get back at the jews. Yep after all its the jews committing mass murder not the arabs!

You should pat yourself on the back for falling to the giant Muslim propaganda machine which tries to blame Israel for all its faults. Even before Israel existed in the 20th century the Arabs were finding reasons to kill jews, because its in the Koran.
 

nullzero

Senior member
Jan 15, 2005
670
0
0
I like to add also mohammad and his Followers went on a rampage of Jew slaughtering through out Saudi Arabia, killing the Jewish men and selling off the wifes. Why dont the Arabs give back the land in north western Saudi Arabia? Pretty funny the majority of arabs complain about the few million Jews left in the little country of Israel, but when you compare the past of conqueroring and pushing out other religions from half the world it doesnt exist in their book. Lets see Billions of Arabs and yet they cant get their ****** together, killing each other treating each and the world like crap and still living in the dark ages. Now I see why they want to destory Israel its because they are so jeleous of how the small amount of Jews are thriving so well in the few hundred square miles of land where they have been for over a thousand years. Muslim faith wasnt even founded when Jews were living in Israel.
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: nullzero
I like to add also mohammad and his Followers went on a rampage of Jew slaughtering through out Saudi Arabia, killing the Jewish men and selling off the wifes. Why dont the Arabs give back the land in north western Saudi Arabia? Pretty funny the majority of arabs complain about the few million Jews left in the little country of Israel, but when you compare the past of conqueroring and pushing out other religions from half the world it doesnt exist in their book. Lets see Billions of Arabs and yet they cant get their ****** together, killing each other treating each and the world like crap and still living in the dark ages. Now I see why they want to destory Israel its because they are so jeleous of how the small amount of Jews are thriving so well in the few hundred square miles of land where they have been for over a thousand years. Muslim faith wasnt even founded when Jews were living in Israel.

Correct, they despise western civilization not only because of its morals, values, and culture but because of how prosperous and educated the civilization is. Islam wants to takeover the world. Takeover Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, and jews. And when they are finished we will all be either dead or living like pigs in the dirt.
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Originally posted by: Vich
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
Quotes that pretty much sum up the argument-

From the small amount i read this article is pointing fingers at Barak and Clinton for pressuring Arafat.

Carter is an idiot filled with hate.

Carter is an idiot.

The far left is preaching hate and is instigating another mass witch hunt.

Amazingly Carter is a hero to many on the left who think his approach to North Korea and Palestine are the right way to go. He is the number one advocate of appeasement in the country right now. Just give the dictators whatever they want and the dictators will behave.

Carter is a deranged nutjob, he should go join the socialist party in Venezuela.

President Carter seems to be a little loopy on this subject.

Basically, the defenders of Israel are well entrenched and well indoctrinated, completely partisan and willing to do whatever it takes to defend their position. Name-calling and denial are the standard tools, with willful ignorance being the driving force...

They'll not be convinced in any way- but they're not the whole audience, by any stretch of the imagination. Which is why they're denouncing Carter so strongly- they want to maintain media dominance, shape and control the flow of information to their liking, as they've done for the last 60 years...

And this-

Hmm, a long time since I've seen this canned response of yours.
Too bad that Arabs and Jews living side by side in Haifa invalidate all your insinuations.
Nice try though -- at least you got to yammer about the Arayan Nation again.

Israelis are content to have a small and highly manageable minority of Arabs in their nation, as is the case in Haifa, where Jews are 90%. That's not the case in the whole of Palestine, however, where Arabs constitute at least 40% of the population. And Israelis are intent on maintaining the "Jewishness" of their society, pretty much through any means short of mass murder.

http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/24511.html

How absolutely stupid are you? The jews fight to survive on there tiny slip of land, and you continue to point fingers at them as if they are the perpetrators? How about the 2000billion Muslims surrounding them who are blowing up themselves, their mothers, and their children to get back at the jews. Yep after all its the jews committing mass murder not the arabs!

You should pat yourself on the back for falling to the giant Muslim propaganda machine which tries to blame Israel for all its faults. Even before Israel existed in the 20th century the Arabs were finding reasons to kill jews, because its in the Koran.

How absolutely stupid of you to believe that two wrongs make a right?
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
You're right Narmer: the Arab states should've butted out in 1948 (first wrong), and again in 1967 (second wrong).
 

Trevelyan

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2000
4,077
0
71
Originally posted by: brandonb
Originally posted by: RichardE
I am personally glad he is probally ruined over this.

This attitude is exactly why Jew's have historically been hated by many different people since the dawn of time, including Palestinians. With Jews so eager to ruin others who don't agree/accept them and their ways. It's no wonder there is conflict surrounding them.

Wow, prejudiced much?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
How absolutely stupid are you? The jews fight to survive on there tiny slip of land, and you continue to point fingers at them as if they are the perpetrators? How about the 2000billion Muslims surrounding them who are blowing up themselves, their mothers, and their children to get back at the jews. Yep after all its the jews committing mass murder not the arabs!

You should pat yourself on the back for falling to the giant Muslim propaganda machine which tries to blame Israel for all its faults. Even before Israel existed in the 20th century the Arabs were finding reasons to kill jews, because its in the Koran.

Amazing. I point out that name-calling, denial, and willful ignorance comprise many of the statements in this thread, and you simply respond with more of the same...

Israelis aren't "the jews"- until just recently, there were more jews in the US than in Israel, and they're clearly in no danger of persecution here... And your understanding of history is woefully lacking. Jews and Christians are "People of the Book", enjoying a protected status in Koranic theology-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Book

And thrived in Islamic countries until recent times. They helped to defend Jerusalem from the Crusaders in 1096, and 1/5 of modern jews, the Sephardim, are descendants of those expelled to islamic countries by the Spanish in 1492...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_and_the_Crusades

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Spain

From the Wiki article about Spanish Jews-

Those who were fortunate enough to reach Ottoman Empire had a better fate, the Sultan Bayezid II was known to sarcastically send his gratitude to Ferdinand for sending him some of his best subjects, thus "impoverising his own lands while enriching his (Bayezid's)". Jews arriving in Ottoman Empire were mostly resettled in and around Selanik (Thessaloniki in Greek) and to some extent in Istanbul and Izmir.

It was only the rise of Zionism and British rule that turned muslims against their Jewish neighbors. Standard British technique was to rule colonial populations by pitting different segments against each other, and Palestine was no different. Muslims saw the Jewish settlers as allies of the occupation, and implementation of the Balfour declaration encouraged that view. Finally, when the Israelis expelled the pals in 1948, refusing to allow them to return at the end of hostilities, muslim sentiment basically forced their governments to do the same- which was precisely what Zionist Israel wanted. It's called population migration, or population transfer, something the founders of Israel believed in very deeply.

Not that you'll actually read or understand much of it, Vich, but it's not all about you, anyway...

Returning to Barak's alleged offer of 2000- If that were what the Israelis were willing to settle for, they had and have the power to implement it unilaterally, pulling out of many palestinian areas. But they haven't, of course, because that's not what they want, at all. They still covet and intend to take much of what little pals have left- trying to look good doing it, but doing it nonetheless...
 

Vich

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,849
1
0
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
How absolutely stupid are you? The jews fight to survive on there tiny slip of land, and you continue to point fingers at them as if they are the perpetrators? How about the 2000billion Muslims surrounding them who are blowing up themselves, their mothers, and their children to get back at the jews. Yep after all its the jews committing mass murder not the arabs!

You should pat yourself on the back for falling to the giant Muslim propaganda machine which tries to blame Israel for all its faults. Even before Israel existed in the 20th century the Arabs were finding reasons to kill jews, because its in the Koran.

Amazing. I point out that name-calling, denial, and willful ignorance comprise many of the statements in this thread, and you simply respond with more of the same...

Israelis aren't "the jews"- until just recently, there were more jews in the US than in Israel, and they're clearly in no danger of persecution here... And your understanding of history is woefully lacking. Jews and Christians are "People of the Book", enjoying a protected status in Koranic theology-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Book

And thrived in Islamic countries until recent times. They helped to defend Jerusalem from the Crusaders in 1096, and 1/5 of modern jews, the Sephardim, are descendants of those expelled to islamic countries by the Spanish in 1492...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_and_the_Crusades

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Spain

From the Wiki article about Spanish Jews-

Those who were fortunate enough to reach Ottoman Empire had a better fate, the Sultan Bayezid II was known to sarcastically send his gratitude to Ferdinand for sending him some of his best subjects, thus "impoverising his own lands while enriching his (Bayezid's)". Jews arriving in Ottoman Empire were mostly resettled in and around Selanik (Thessaloniki in Greek) and to some extent in Istanbul and Izmir.

It was only the rise of Zionism and British rule that turned muslims against their Jewish neighbors. Standard British technique was to rule colonial populations by pitting different segments against each other, and Palestine was no different. Muslims saw the Jewish settlers as allies of the occupation, and implementation of the Balfour declaration encouraged that view. Finally, when the Israelis expelled the pals in 1948, refusing to allow them to return at the end of hostilities, muslim sentiment basically forced their governments to do the same- which was precisely what Zionist Israel wanted. It's called population migration, or population transfer, something the founders of Israel believed in very deeply.

Not that you'll actually read or understand much of it, Vich, but it's not all about you, anyway...

Returning to Barak's alleged offer of 2000- If that were what the Israelis were willing to settle for, they had and have the power to implement it unilaterally, pulling out of many palestinian areas. But they haven't, of course, because that's not what they want, at all. They still covet and intend to take much of what little pals have left- trying to look good doing it, but doing it nonetheless...


First of all you are incorrect about Christians and Jews being "protected" in Koranic theology, and please do not cite wikipedia. Cite the Koran itself.

All of Islam preaches jihad and progress toward an entire Islamic state or power under Islam. Regardless of extremism the verses of the Koran if you have read them plainly state that the religious duty of all muslims is to spread the words of Islam using Taqiyya (lies, deception) and force. Taqiyya is created by concealing the fact that the koran also contains verses, written later in Muhammads preaching which call for unremitting war and violence against infidels until they submit to Islam. They conceal the fact that, under Islamic doctrine of naksh, or "abrogation", when there is a contradiction between verses in the Koran, the later verse supersedes the earlier verse. This can be found in sura 2:106, and sura 16:101.
Sura 5:33 states that "For those who do not submit to Allah their punishment is...execution or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet, from the opposite sides, or exile form the land."

According to some scholars of Islam, verses 9:5 and 5:33, all by themselves, supersede and cancel at least 124 earlier verses.


Sura 8:59 in the Koran says " The infidels (Jews, Christians, Hindus etc) should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them".

Sura 9 verse 5 of the Koran says: "Fight and slay the pagans (Pagas are again Jews, Christians, and other non-muslims) wherever you find them and see them, belittle them and lie and wait for them in every strategy of war."

It was only the rise of Zionism and British rule that turned muslims against their Jewish neighbors

Incorrect, Arab conquest began in AD 638 through AD 1099 with the tribes of Israel already established in Canaan no later than 1212 BC, according to hieroglyphic inscription.
The arab conquest steamrolled through the Jews and all the way to europe.

Keep trying Jhhnn.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Heh. Citing interpretation of Koranic verse doesn't negate history, Vich...

The Ottomans welcomed the Sephardim, expelled from Christian Spain, and Jews and Muslims stood shoulder to shoulder in the defense of Jerusalem hundreds of years earlier...

Factual information. But, then, facts that stand in contradiction to what you believe are easily discarded, right?