It's for running a laptop and charging batteries. When we're working we have to leave the laptop running and processing on things while the car is turned off, so we need to keep it plugged in. Sometimes we forget to turn the system off at night and since the inverter is connected directly to the battery, in the morning the battery is drained. Do that a few times with a normal car battery and it becomes toast pretty quick. My thinking was to get a deep cycle and if it gets discharged on accident, that's fine. They're built for that. I really didn't want to rig up some complex electrical system on my own.
But having the amount of juice flowing actually INCREASE (assuming mechanical resistance remains constant, an increase in cranking speed would indicate this) is abnormal, and could perhaps be the result of a bad gel cell battery?
The intertubes said:Starting, Marine, and Deep-Cycle Batteries
Starting (sometimes called SLI, for starting, lighting, ignition) batteries are commonly used to start and run engines. Engine starters need a very large starting current for a very short time. Starting batteries have a large number of thin plates for maximum surface area. The plates are composed of a Lead "sponge", similar in appearance to a very fine foam sponge. This gives a very large surface area, but if deep cycled, this sponge will quickly be consumed and fall to the bottom of the cells. Automotive batteries will generally fail after 30-150 deep cycles if deep cycled, while they may last for thousands of cycles in normal starting use (2-5% discharge).
Deep cycle batteries are designed to be discharged down as much as 80% time after time, and have much thicker plates. The major difference between a true deep cycle battery and others is that the plates are SOLID Lead plates - not sponge. This gives less surface area, thus less "instant" power like starting batteries need. Although these can be cycled down to 20% charge, the best lifespan vs cost method is to keep the average cycle at about 50% discharge.
Unfortunately, it is often impossible to tell what you are really buying in some of the discount stores or places that specialize in automotive batteries. The golf car battery is quite popular for small systems and RV's. The problem is that "golf car" refers to a size of battery case (commonly called GC-2, or T-105), not the type or construction - so the quality and construction of a golf car battery can vary considerably - ranging from the cheap off brand with thin plates up the true deep cycle brands, such as Crown, Trojan, etc. In general, you get what you pay for.
Marine batteries are usually a "hybrid", and fall between the starting and deep-cycle batteries, though a few (Rolls-Surrette and Concorde, for example) are true deep cycle. In the hybrid, the plates may be composed of Lead sponge, but it is coarser and heavier than that used in starting batteries. It is often hard to tell what you are getting in a "marine" battery, but most are a hybrid. Starting batteries are usually rated at "CCA", or cold cranking amps, or "MCA", Marine cranking amps - the same as "CA". Any battery with the capacity shown in CA or MCA may or may not be a true deep-cycle battery. It is sometimes hard to tell, as the term deep cycle is often overused - we have even seen the term "deep cycle" used in automotive starting battery advertising. CA and MCA ratings are at 32 degrees F, while CCA is at zero degree F. Unfortunately, the only positive way to tell with some batteries is to buy one and cut it open - not much of an option.
More intertubes said:Using a deep cycle battery as a starting battery
There is generally no problem with this, providing that allowance is made for the lower cranking amps compared to a similar size starting battery. As a general rule, if you are going to use a true deep cycle battery (such as the Concorde SunXtender) also as a starting battery, it should be oversized about 20% compared to the existing or recommended starting battery group size to get the same cranking amps. That is about the same as replacing a group 24 with a group 31. With modern engines with fuel injection and electronic ignition, it generally takes much less battery power to crank and start them, so raw cranking amps is less important than it used to be. On the other hand, many cars, boats, and RV's are more heavily loaded with power sucking "appliances", such as megawatt stereo systems etc. that are more suited for deep cycle batteries. We have used the Concorde SunXtender AGM batteries in some of our vehicles with no problems.
It will not hurt a deep cycle battery to be used as a starting battery, but for the same size battery they cannot supply as much cranking amps as a regular starting battery and is usually much more expensive.
Could old gas possibly cause a similar problem of the engine cranking but not quite catching ignition for a few tries?
I have a Honda Fit with an Optima Yellow Top "deep cycle" battery. I got it because I was planning on running lots of electronics and would discharge the battery a lot of times.
I left it sitting for 4 months while in China.
It was completely dead when I got back but after driving around it has no problem starting in the middle of the day. But in the mornings in CA it almost always fails to start the first time.
So I wait for 30 seconds and try starting the car again, pumping the gas pedal while at it. Still can't make it. Wait for another 30 seconds. Nope. Wait some more. And then it starts.
I'm curious what's going on here. I would think that with repeated ignition attempts the battery would get weaker so it would become *less* possible to start, not *more*...
In winter though up in Tahoe I just have to straight up jump the battery every time in the mornings.
Lithium...Iron...Phosphate?
Wait, no...what the hell is 'Po'?
This isn't chemistry class.But yeah, you and others seem to be confirming the suspicions of...me and others. He needs to ditch the Optima battery.
edit: Oh shit, I was actually right on 'phosphate'...I remembered something from school. Mind blown. I just saw it in lowercase and was like 'they're making Polonium batteries?!'
Lithium...Iron...Phosphate?
Wait, no...what the hell is 'Po'?
This isn't chemistry class.But yeah, you and others seem to be confirming the suspicions of...me and others. He needs to ditch the Optima battery.
edit: Oh shit, I was actually right on 'phosphate'...I remembered something from school. Mind blown. I just saw it in lowercase and was like 'they're making Polonium batteries?!'
Are Optima batteries supposed to suck or something?
More properly called an air pedal.![]()
I don't know how plate size translates with those batteries. The entire cell is spiral, which makes its construction more like that of an electrolytic cap, I believe. I would think that would translate to a bigger surface area...but the whole 'gel cell' thing just nixes any comparison for me.
Are Optima batteries supposed to suck or something?
Using a deep cycle battery as a starting battery
There is generally no problem with this, providing that allowance is made for the lower cranking amps compared to a similar size starting battery. As a general rule, if you are going to use a true deep cycle battery (such as the Concorde SunXtender) also as a starting battery, it should be oversized about 20% compared to the existing or recommended starting battery group size to get the same cranking amps. That is about the same as replacing a group 24 with a group 31. With modern engines with fuel injection and electronic ignition, it generally takes much less battery power to crank and start them, so raw cranking amps is less important than it used to be. On the other hand, many cars, boats, and RV's are more heavily loaded with power sucking "appliances", such as megawatt stereo systems etc. that are more suited for deep cycle batteries. We have used the Concorde SunXtender AGM batteries in some of our vehicles with no problems.
It will not hurt a deep cycle battery to be used as a starting battery, but for the same size battery they cannot supply as much cranking amps as a regular starting battery and is usually much more expensive.
So, even without his inputP), working hypothesis:
Optima battery worked for a while, but was probably not capable of providing the same peak cranking amps as his factory battery- granted, the factory battery should be capable of delivering far in excess of what is needed to start the car, given a good charge. But this was probably step in on the chain of 'fail.'
Step two, inadequate charging voltage. Battery's state of charge is gradually reduced, and likely its actual capacity along with it.
Step three, battery too weak to start car. If this took a long time (years), it can probably be attributed to both slow battery death and general (normal) degradation of cables and connections (i.e. already inadequate voltage became maybe just a critical tenth or two lower).
Solution: REPLACE YOUR DAMNED BATTERY. THEY BOTH TEST AND REPLACE FOR FREE AT THE PARTS STORE. JBFAC*!
(*jesus-butt-fucking-ass-christ, I made up a new internet acronym)