And the definition of the word 'is' is?
Is your first name Bill?
Its a fair distinction when you have the US Secretary of State saying we shouldn't execute as Texas is putting the needle in his arm.
Did the federal govt prevent the execution? Did they take Texas to court to prevent the execution? Did they do *anything* that could be construed as trying to stop the execution? Or was the Sec. State simply voicing an opinion?
Yeah.
I don't know Canadian law, but here in the US you generally need 'intent' to be guilty. If the guy never intended to enter Canada not sure how how could have had intent to smuggle a gun in.
Fern
whats freaking hilarious is, had he remembered where he put his gun and declared it, its only 25 bucks and some paper work to get a 60 day gun permit.
whats freaking hilarious is, had he remembered where he put his gun and declared it, its only 25 bucks and some paper work to get a 60 day gun permit.
As soon as he lied (or arguably forgot) about the presence of the weapon there's your intent.
Yep fair amount of sign indicate you are going to enter into Canada, Last exit before Canada!This story just doesn't add up to me. I looked up the location on Google maps and this is a major border crossing. There's simply no way I can see someone crossing it because they took a wrong turn.
Apparently (from the story) he didn't want to go to Canada and didn't realize where it was. Yeah it was dumb, ok real dumb, but there doesn't seem to be any reason to believe that it just wasn't... dumb. A good tongue lashing and fine, but three years jail? The punishment doesn't fit the circumstances.
Yes, the federal government filed a lawsuit in court to try to prevent the executions. They lost.
this.At any border entry point you don't need intent. You just need to be in violation of customs regs. Your actions at that point will determine how severe it is.
"I forgot about the firearm in my center console" isn't going to play well when you deny having any weapons.
Bringing Weapons Into Canada
Weapons are strictly controlled. Visitors bringing firearms into Canada, or planning to borrow and use firearms while in Canada, are required to declare the firearms in writing using a Non-Resident Firearm Declaration Form.
NOTE: Travelers should be advised that certain knives, even those used for hunting and fishing, may be considered prohibited weapons.
In all cases, travelers must declare to Canadian Customs authorities any firearms and weapons in their possession when entering Canada. There are often facilities near border crossings where weapons may be stored, pending the traveler's return to the United States, but this should be done before attempting to enter Canada.
NOTE:Canadian law requires that officials seize firearms and weapons from those crossing the border who deny having them in their possession. Seized firearms and weapons are never returned.
In 2000, the NRA paid $100,000 for an infomercial about what it called "the Canadian situation" that aired on The National Network in the U.S., according to Bernardo, who appeared in the video.
It cautioned gun owners the registry was a government plot to find out how many guns there were in order to seize them and leave citizens helpless to defend themselves.
The late actor Charlton Heston, who was president of the NRA in 2000, made an appearance in Canada in April of that year, condemning the long-gun registry at a BC Wildlife Federation meeting in Prince George, B.C. "You may not be absolutely free by owning a firearm, but I guarantee that you will never be free when you can't. That is not written, that is God-given," he said, while condemning Canada's firearm registration law.
Dude, the LGR was a colossal waste of tax-payers money. It wasn't accurate and it didn't reduce crime.According to the CBC the NRA has a history of meddling in Canadian gun law, with success with long guns, are handguns next?.
Edit, this is classic:
Hey, I'm just applying some liberal logic to the situation.
Depends on whether you're the pitcher or the catcher.
According to the CBC the NRA has a history of meddling in Canadian gun law, with success with long guns, are handguns next?.
Edit, this is classic:
Dude, the LGR was a colossal waste of tax-payers money. It wasn't accurate and it didn't reduce crime.
Crimes committed with Long Guns are tiny compared to crimes committed with handguns. Handguns have been registered (and restricted) since 1938 in Canada.
So what's your point? Read them, ignore them, why in the world would I care?Read your posts. You literally sound dumb as fuck.
New York does not honor concealed permits issued by any state. Vermont honors from all states.
Interactive map below.
http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html
This story just doesn't add up to me. I looked up the location on Google maps and this is a major border crossing. There's simply no way I can see someone crossing it because they took a wrong turn.
This is my sticking point with the situation...
Shouldn't they have some sort of provision to turn around?
"I apologize, but we made a wrong turn back there and actually do not wish to enter Canada."
The other thing we all need to remember is that this is one article and we must accept that what is in the article is what really happened. Border security being what it is these days, I would imagine a request to turn around would not be honored. But at that point bureaucracy took over. As was said, his lawyer doesn't sound like he's the cream of the crop - based on the article anyway. Canada, in my opinion is going to throw their money away going after this guy, but it's their money and they can spend it whatever way they want.
He had his ass hung way out in the wind with the weapon in NY which is unfortunate. Unfortunate that NY has laws that restrict the rights of the citizens of the country to that degree.
NY: State NRA membership nearly doubled in 2013At some point you'd think politicians would realize their efforts are having the opposite effect. But, many of them are little more than whores willing to open wide for whomever is offering the most.