• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Canadian Election 2011

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You do know there has been one majority EVER with more than 50% of the vote? Diefenbaker in the 50's.
Every election the losers cry for reform but none of the politcal parties do, so it appears to be working for them.
I'd like to see seat redistbutation by population though BC, Alberta, and Ontario are under represented and others over represented. The seat allocations haven't kept pace with population changes
If people vote in unqualified candidates and go w the party over the individual thats their choice, lots make it just dont expect cabinet positions for your guy
 
desy said:
You do know there has been one majority EVER with more than 50% of the vote? Diefenbaker in the 50's.
Every election the losers cry for reform but none of the politcal parties do, so it appears to be working for them.
I'd like to see seat redistbutation by population though BC, Alberta, and Ontario are under represented and others over represented. The seat allocations haven't kept pace with population changes
If people vote in unqualified candidates and go w the party over the individual thats their choice, lots make it just dont expect cabinet positions for your guy
Click to expand...

I have been after electoral reform for some time now. I am sick and tired of the current system.
 
desy said:
What are you proposing?
Click to expand...

Any system which prevents this from happening again.

I'd like to see some sort of proportional representation mixed with direct representation, and an elected senate. The PM should still be tied to the house of commons though.

The problem is parties are always vying for a majority. A proportional representation system almost assuredly prevents that from ever happening, so they will never go for it. You can't expect them to enact legislation which kneecaps themselves.
 
desy said:
What are you proposing?
Click to expand...

something that is more proportional rep.

Say we grab 5 ridings and merge them into one district. Each voter has 5 votes. You can either give all 5 votes to 1 person or spread it out.
That way, if I like only 1 candidate, I give him/her all five votes. Or I can spread it around.

It is entirely possible I get 2 good candidates show up in the district but representing different parties. I want to be able to get both to Ottawa.


This way, parties are not able to fuck with ridings too much.
 
Imp said:
People starting to cry foul over some Quebec candidates: primarily the young'uns and the one that doesn't speak French.
Click to expand...

Too late no? They were on the ballot, they were elected. Quebec has itself to blame for this, not NDP.
 
Imp said:
People starting to cry foul over some Quebec candidates: primarily the young'uns and the one that doesn't speak French.
Click to expand...
The people who voted for him don't seem to care that he can't speak french. DEMOCRACY IS WRONG. YOU MUST SPEAK FRENCH!!!
 
Imp said:
Apparently the Libs and Cons are talking about voting irregularities and 100 signatures for the nomination petition. The votes still add up to her winning though, so I don't see the problem.
Click to expand...
Canada's version of birthers.
Obama can't be president because he's black not born here.
Person in Quebec can't be an MP because some technical thing nobody cares about 😀
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top