- Jun 2, 2007
- 1,409
- 0
- 0
Back to school for you! Lol
I think it's just awakward to do that without a surface to place things on. it's more of a test of dexterity.
Wait, was there some part of that question I was missing?
Didn't they do that kind of stuff in middle school or elementary school science classes?
The only way I'd have said "no" was if they handed me a 1.5V alkaline and a bulb rated for 120V.
(In which case I'd need to build some manner of boost converter - or just buy one.It'd suck the battery dry damn quick though, and I might need something like a NiCad that could handle the current requirements.)
It's a stupid question to ask at graduation though. If you sat them down they would figure it out.
Wait... I'm confused. You CAN do it right? Bulb on top of battery, side of screw back to bottom of battery with the wire?
Wait... I'm confused. You CAN do it right? Bulb on top of battery, side of screw back to bottom of battery with the wire?
It's a stupid question to ask at graduation though. If you sat them down they would figure it out.
I mean I'm sure I could find plenty of graduates who don't how a wing generates lift. I'd bet that most would say something along the lines of "air travels farther/faster over the top surface" + Bernoulli's Eqn... which is completely wrong. Or graduates who couldn't tell you what chemical reaction produces salt. Or graduates who don't can't answer questions about simple genetics. Basically, grads of field X who don't know basic concepts from field Y. Big fucking surprise.
Heh, ok I guess I'm one of them that's wrong about how a wing generates lift. I need to go back to whoever told me the wrong answer and punish them.
Bernoulli is the commonly taught principle for lift.
It has more to do with oldsmoboats 3rd law, and threatening the wing/air with butt rape
Of course, I should probably know that
Everyone with an engineering degree takes higher level physics class that contains a section on circuits. However, only the most basic chemistry class is required. As for the wing question, that's a bit trickier because it isn't as well understood and isn't covered in low level, non-specific courses. It is also subject to conditions (bernoullii effect DOES come into play at slower speeds) and there are many sources of incorrect knowledge on it. Just google "myth wing lift". There is no such issue with chemistry of salts and series electrical circuits.wtf? That's not MIT for the most part: the person who got it RIGHT is from MIT. For the others, wrong buildings, wrong colors, wrong cap & gown, wrong "im better than you" douchebag at the podium, wrong everything.
The students who couldn't do it are from HARVARD. The architecture is characteristic of their campus. The cap & gown is theirs:
http://sswift.net/photo_album.html (ctrl-f for "harvard graduation")
Fuck the jackasses who made that video.
The person who got it right (the black kid) is probably from MIT. The clothing is correct & the building in the background is our Green Building:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/MIT-Green-Building.jpg
Also the whole premise of this is stupid. Without knowing whether the students were required to take an E&M course or some sort of basic EE class, why would you expect them to have any clue about what a circuit is? (Because it was clear from the video that several of them were not electrical engineers... and since they were from Harvard, none of them were any kind of engineer!)
I mean I'm sure I could find plenty of graduates who don't how a wing generates lift. I'd bet that most would say something along the lines of "air travels farther/faster over the top surface" + Bernoulli's Eqn... which is completely wrong. Or graduates who couldn't tell you what chemical reaction produces salt. Or graduates who don't can't answer questions about simple genetics. Basically, grads of field X who don't know basic concepts from field Y. Big fucking surprise.
I think it's just awakward to do that without a surface to place things on. it's more of a test of dexterity.