PlasmaBomb
Lifer
- Nov 19, 2004
- 11,636
- 2
- 81
Last edited:
It's possible to illuminate a bulb with NO wire and NO dry cell. AAA, AA, C, D parts are dry cells NOT batteries!The most common batteries used by the consumer are 6V lantern cells and of course the 9V rectangular battery.
Hindsight is 20/20.
It is simple once you know the answer, but difficult when you are handled the problem with a camera in your face.
All of them would have gotten it if they had a few minutes to look at it.
Also, everyone in that video is probably smarter than anyone on this board.
Sorry, I play devil's advocate a lot...
That's whats wrong with kids these days - they have little interest in taking home what they learned and having fun with it. That's how you force your brain to remember things, with entertainment.
Also, everyone in that video is probably smarter than anyone on this board.
Sorry, I play devil's advocate a lot...
Correct.
Apparently they forgot that you need a complete circuit?
Do we have any Harvard or MIT grads on the board?Quite an overgeneralizing statement....
Do we have any Harvard or MIT grads on the board?
I know measuring intelligence is tough, but it's a pretty safe bet that most Harvard / MIT grads are smarter than most of the people on this board.
I used to light LED's off a 9v battery, no wires needed.
Do we have any Harvard or MIT grads on the board?
I know measuring intelligence is tough, but it's a pretty safe bet that most Harvard / MIT grads are smarter than most of the people on this board.
shit I knew how to do this before I went to kindergarten.
Mind you I did grow up in a electronics parts mid level distributor/retail store![]()
It's not that hard to ask someone to make a very simple version of something they've probably used a hundred times, a flashlight. Anyone who has replaced the batteries in a flashlight should be able to do what the black kid did at the end.wtf? That's not MIT for the most part: the person who got it RIGHT is from MIT. For the others, wrong buildings, wrong colors, wrong cap & gown, wrong "im better than you" douchebag at the podium, wrong everything.
The students who couldn't do it are from HARVARD. The architecture is characteristic of their campus. The cap & gown is theirs:
http://sswift.net/photo_album.html (ctrl-f for "harvard graduation")
Fuck the jackasses who made that video.
The person who got it right (the black kid) is probably from MIT. The clothing is correct & the building in the background is our Green Building:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/MIT-Green-Building.jpg
Also the whole premise of this is stupid. Without knowing whether the students were required to take an E&M course or some sort of basic EE class, why would you expect them to have any clue about what a circuit is? (Because it was clear from the video that several of them were not electrical engineers... and since they were from Harvard, none of them were any kind of engineer!)
I mean I'm sure I could find plenty of graduates who don't how a wing generates lift. I'd bet that most would say something along the lines of "air travels farther/faster over the top surface" + Bernoulli's Eqn... which is completely wrong. Or graduates who couldn't tell you what chemical reaction produces salt. Or graduates who don't can't answer questions about simple genetics. Basically, grads of field X who don't know basic concepts from field Y. Big fucking surprise.
5 year old: "Hey sdifox, that's my house over there! Where do you live?"
sdifox: "I live in an electronics parts mid level distributor/retail store."
5 year old: "Wow!"
Later:
"sdifox lives in a parts bin!"
wtf? That's not MIT for the most part: the person who got it RIGHT is from MIT. For the others, wrong buildings, wrong colors, wrong cap & gown, wrong "im better than you" douchebag at the podium, wrong everything.
The students who couldn't do it are from HARVARD. The architecture is characteristic of their campus. The cap & gown is theirs:
http://sswift.net/photo_album.html (ctrl-f for "harvard graduation")
Fuck the jackasses who made that video.
The person who got it right (the black kid) is probably from MIT. The clothing is correct & the building in the background is our Green Building:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/MIT-Green-Building.jpg
Also the whole premise of this is stupid. Without knowing whether the students were required to take an E&M course or some sort of basic EE class, why would you expect them to have any clue about what a circuit is? (Because it was clear from the video that several of them were not electrical engineers... and since they were from Harvard, none of them were any kind of engineer!)
I mean I'm sure I could find plenty of graduates who don't how a wing generates lift. I'd bet that most would say something along the lines of "air travels farther/faster over the top surface" + Bernoulli's Eqn... which is completely wrong. Or graduates who couldn't tell you what chemical reaction produces salt. Or graduates who don't can't answer questions about simple genetics. Basically, grads of field X who don't know basic concepts from field Y. Big fucking surprise.
Hindsight is 20/20.
It is simple once you know the answer, but difficult when you are handled the problem with a camera in your face.
All of them would have gotten it if they had a few minutes to look at it.
Also, everyone in that video is probably smarter than anyone on this board.
Sorry, I play devil's advocate a lot...
plus asking 'just graduates' which may have had a big night prior...
Being MIT grads, I am sure (at least hope) they'd figure this out if given time. Most of our grads in the last 10 years or so...I am not sure.
I went back to college in 2000 (I am almost 40). The amount of cheating was insane...in many of my classes I talked to the professor about doing it a different way because of what I just stumbled on hearing things.
One of my best was doing a CPU simulation in ASP/VBScipt instead of C++.
It's sad that college has become just an extension of high school. We should never have allowed that. Most really have no place going beyond high school.
Heh, ok I guess I'm one of them that's wrong about how a wing generates lift. I need to go back to whoever told me the wrong answer and punish them.
HCl + NaOH = NaCl + H2O?
wtf? That's not MIT for the most part: the person who got it RIGHT is from MIT. For the others, wrong buildings, wrong colors, wrong cap & gown, wrong "im better than you" douchebag at the podium, wrong everything.
The students who couldn't do it are from HARVARD. The architecture is characteristic of their campus. The cap & gown is theirs:
http://sswift.net/photo_album.html (ctrl-f for "harvard graduation")
Fuck the jackasses who made that video.
The person who got it right (the black kid) is probably from MIT. The clothing is correct & the building in the background is our Green Building:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/MIT-Green-Building.jpg
Also the whole premise of this is stupid. Without knowing whether the students were required to take an E&M course or some sort of basic EE class, why would you expect them to have any clue about what a circuit is? (Because it was clear from the video that several of them were not electrical engineers... and since they were from Harvard, none of them were any kind of engineer!)
I mean I'm sure I could find plenty of graduates who don't how a wing generates lift. I'd bet that most would say something along the lines of "air travels farther/faster over the top surface" + Bernoulli's Eqn... which is completely wrong. Or graduates who couldn't tell you what chemical reaction produces salt. Or graduates who don't can't answer questions about simple genetics. Basically, grads of field X who don't know basic concepts from field Y. Big fucking surprise.
why would you expect them to have any clue about what a circuit is? (Because it was clear from the video that several of them were not electrical engineers...
