Can you guys give this setup a once over for me.

[narzy]

Originally posted by: yoda291

Originally posted by: spanky
i got u this time narzy... how a mousepad!

optical mouse?

I got you tho.

HSF + TIM?

retail box CPU has HS/Fan I'm not an overclocker (yet) so with the amount of cooling the case provides, and the TIM/HSF that Intel provides, should be safice for now. when I do start to OC, it will be somthing that I will definatly want to get.

 

[ElFenix]

<makes joke about men with small harddrives>

 

[yoda291]

Originally posted by: narzy

Originally posted by: yoda291

Originally posted by: spanky
i got u this time narzy... how a mousepad!

optical mouse?

I got you tho.

HSF + TIM?

retail box CPU has HS/Fan I'm not an overclocker (yet) so with the amount of cooling the case provides, and the TIM/HSF that Intel provides, should be safice for now. when I do start to OC, it will be somthing that I will definatly want to get.

eeew...retail.

just saying the word retail makes rossman cry you know.

 

[narzy]

I don't have a big hard drive because I have a big <BANNED>

AnandTech Moderator

 

[narzy]

Rossman needs a good cry now and then.

 

[manly]

I can't comment on high-end system components but you're probably better off shortening your PC buying cycle from 3 years to 2 years, and not buying best-of-breed components up-front.

Also, since this is a gaming rig, many folks here would say wait until DX9 games come out (namely DOOM 3) before committing to an expensive GPU. No doubt the Radeon 9800 Pro will be a great card for many months to come, but in the meantime it will just be a waste of money.

Are you getting all your parts from one vendor?

 

[Bignate603]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
<makes joke about men with small harddrives>

It's not the size of the harddrive, it's how you use it!!!

 

[codeyf]

Looks good. Just PM me when you're about to order it so I can give you my shipping address

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: narzy

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

really? damn I was hoping this would come across as a real bad-ass rig .

He doesn't have any links to back him up, and I would definitely check the info if the homonym usage was so horrid.

SR review of 360GD, desktop performance

 

[Howard]

BTW, where are you getting your stuff?

A stick of GeIL 512MB DDR400 is $70 at Newegg.

And you can always buy a slower speed P4 and OC it.

 

[MercenaryForHire]

Buy a P4 2.4C and good HSF, and bump yourself into the Wonderful World of the 1GHz FSB. :Q

- M4H

 

[godmare]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Buy a P4 2.4C and good HSF, and bump yourself into the Wonderful World of the 1GHz FSB. :Q

- M4H

Exactly what I think.
No sense in spending $452 on a P4 3.0 when a 2.4C is $207 at newegg and will easily overclock over 3.0.
Go to HardOCP and see where they got a preproduction 2.4C
link

 

[Jmmsbnd007]

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

Converted SCSI? It's Parallel ATA, tell me how that is SCSI? And don't say "because they both use cables"

And read the anandtech benchmarks, it actually OUTPERFORMS the highest-end 15k rpm U320 SCSI drives in many of the benchmarks.

 

[RossMAN]

Originally posted by: narzy
Rossman needs a good cry now and then.

It's always good to be in touch with your inner voice and feelings

 

[narzy]

Originally posted by: Howard
BTW, where are you getting your stuff?

A stick of GeIL 512MB DDR400 is $70 at Newegg.

And you can always buy a slower speed P4 and OC it.

everything from newegg except the ram which I'm getting from Crucial as I always do. I know theres better cheaper ways to do this, but I'm not into overclocking yet, perhaps a tad in the future?

 

[Luagsch]

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

Converted SCSI? It's Parallel ATA, tell me how that is SCSI? And don't say "because they both use cables"

And read the anandtech benchmarks, it actually OUTPERFORMS the highest-end 15k rpm U320 SCSI drives in many of the benchmarks.

funny guy... 15k hdds main subject is to be reliable as they are meant as server-disks, so the speed is important but even more is reliability.
how do you think they got up to 10k rpm? it's 10k rpm tech from the old-scsi-drives in there (as i read in a review, and yes i can't back this up cause it was when the drive was very new and i surf about 384365 pages every day), with sata interface. remember the 1000th of scsi disks? what was their size? x*9 (or x*18) gb.
speed-wise i'm impressed with the numbers seen in the link up there, as they are much higher as the ones i saw (look at the numbers from the beta (same site as above), that were those had in mind), sorry about that.

i didn't know that he has like 436536 teras of space altogether, that's why i said better going with 2 160 or 200gb hdds.

and god damnit. it just were my 2 cents.

 

[Jmmsbnd007]

Originally posted by: Luagsch

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

Converted SCSI? It's Parallel ATA, tell me how that is SCSI? And don't say "because they both use cables"

And read the anandtech benchmarks, it actually OUTPERFORMS the highest-end 15k rpm U320 SCSI drives in many of the benchmarks.

funny guy... 15k hdds main subject is to be reliable as they are meant as server-disks, so the speed is important but even more is reliability.
how do you think they got up to 10k rpm? it's 10k rpm tech from the old-scsi-drives in there (as i read in a review, and yes i can't back this up cause it was when the drive was very new and i surf about 384365 pages every day), with sata output. remember the 1000th of scsi disks? what was their size? x*9 (or x*18) gb.
speed-wise i'm impressed with the numbers seen in the link up there, as they are much higher as the ones i saw (maybe the reviewers i had the infos from fvck up).

i didn't know that he has like 436536 teras of space altogether, that's why i said better going with 2 160 or 200gb hdds.

and god damnit. it just were my 2 cents.

You're fresh meat. Take it easy, expect this from people like me. You're right, SCSI is meant to be reliable and fast. However, with a 5 year warranty, I think WD is quite confident that the Raptor is reliable, also considering it only has one platter. You're right, some of the drive electronics are from WD's previous 10K SCSI drives, which is why they cost only $150 or so... Either way, this is a much better deal unless he absolutely, positively wants SCSI.

 

[Luagsch]

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

Converted SCSI? It's Parallel ATA, tell me how that is SCSI? And don't say "because they both use cables"

And read the anandtech benchmarks, it actually OUTPERFORMS the highest-end 15k rpm U320 SCSI drives in many of the benchmarks.

funny guy... 15k hdds main subject is to be reliable as they are meant as server-disks, so the speed is important but even more is reliability.
how do you think they got up to 10k rpm? it's 10k rpm tech from the old-scsi-drives in there (as i read in a review, and yes i can't back this up cause it was when the drive was very new and i surf about 384365 pages every day), with sata output. remember the 1000th of scsi disks? what was their size? x*9 (or x*18) gb.
speed-wise i'm impressed with the numbers seen in the link up there, as they are much higher as the ones i saw (maybe the reviewers i had the infos from fvck up).

i didn't know that he has like 436536 teras of space altogether, that's why i said better going with 2 160 or 200gb hdds.

and god damnit. it just were my 2 cents.

You're fresh meat. Take it easy, expect this from people like me. You're right, SCSI is meant to be reliable and fast. However, with a 5 year warranty, I think WD is quite confident that the Raptor is reliable, also considering it only has one platter. You're right, some of the drive electronics are from WD's previous 10K SCSI drives, which is why they cost only $150 or so... Either way, this is a much better deal unless he absolutely, positively wants SCSI.

LOL.. okok i give up i edited the stuff up there, i got the numbers from the beta drive...
well i'm in for a n00b-alert

 

[Jmmsbnd007]

Originally posted by: Luagsch

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch

Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007

Originally posted by: Luagsch
the 2x 36 gb hddsare a waist. it's converted scsi technology and it isn't that fast as one would think. safe the money for 2x 160 or 2x200 gb hdds.

also you didn't tell wht kind of ram you're planning tu buy.
i would stick with a 2,4c good ram and overclock this thingy (using a good cooler), as u're taking the xaser3, the throughput of air in the system is good.

this is more of a show-off rig, than a real meant to be bad-ass rig (sorry for that, just my 2 cents)

Converted SCSI? It's Parallel ATA, tell me how that is SCSI? And don't say "because they both use cables"

And read the anandtech benchmarks, it actually OUTPERFORMS the highest-end 15k rpm U320 SCSI drives in many of the benchmarks.

funny guy... 15k hdds main subject is to be reliable as they are meant as server-disks, so the speed is important but even more is reliability.
how do you think they got up to 10k rpm? it's 10k rpm tech from the old-scsi-drives in there (as i read in a review, and yes i can't back this up cause it was when the drive was very new and i surf about 384365 pages every day), with sata output. remember the 1000th of scsi disks? what was their size? x*9 (or x*18) gb.
speed-wise i'm impressed with the numbers seen in the link up there, as they are much higher as the ones i saw (maybe the reviewers i had the infos from fvck up).

i didn't know that he has like 436536 teras of space altogether, that's why i said better going with 2 160 or 200gb hdds.

and god damnit. it just were my 2 cents.

You're fresh meat. Take it easy, expect this from people like me. You're right, SCSI is meant to be reliable and fast. However, with a 5 year warranty, I think WD is quite confident that the Raptor is reliable, also considering it only has one platter. You're right, some of the drive electronics are from WD's previous 10K SCSI drives, which is why they cost only $150 or so... Either way, this is a much better deal unless he absolutely, positively wants SCSI.

LOL.. okok i give up i edited the stuff up there, i got the numbers from the beta drive...
well i'm in for a n00b-alert

Beta drive? *Smack smack*