- Feb 6, 2002
From the article: "In its clearest statement to date, the court said that if a state uses taxpayer money to pay for students attending nonreligious private schools, it must also use taxpayer funds to pay for attendance at religious schools. For all practical purposes, the decision thus invalidates provisions in 37 state constitutions that ban the direct or indirect use of taxpayer money in religious schools."
So people are mad that the SCOTUS ruled religious discrimination is not allowed when allocating tax payer money? What other forms of discrimination are you in favor of?
SCOTUS already discriminate against other religions. That why Rastafarians still aren’t allowed to smoke weed as part of their religious ceremony.