• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Can liberals explain this to me?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
DealMonkey:

Bwuahahahahahahaha!

Man, Rip, I'm sorry dude, but you just leave yourself hanging out there like a deer in the headlights.

-Robert
 
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

oh im sorry, i guess your hackers were better than ours
 
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

oh im sorry, i guess your hackers were better than ours

They didn't need hackers. They had

Walden O'Dell.

I'm sorry. I forgot about Diebold

No need to apologize! Americans don't expect the likes of O'Dell and Bush planning an election with ballots that can't be verified.

 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

"soundly defeated" is a bit much. it was a close race, and the latest opinion polls show that the public is still pretty much ambivalent about Bush's leadership.
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Republicans control the White House, the Senate and the House of Reps. That's pretty convincing.

in terms of party presence, no doubt, but IMO, it's too early to say how much liberal/conservative the next congress will be in comparison to the previous one. some conservative democrates were replaced with moderate Republicans, and vice versa.
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

Indeed. Real problems come in when being defeated in a popular election makes you doubt either yourself or your opinions. I care as little about having 59 million people vote for Bush as I do about 55 million people, along with me, voting for Kerry. Elections don't decide the validity of opinions, and I would say the same thing even if Kerry had won.

 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Republicans control the White House, the Senate and the House of Reps. That's pretty convincing.

Convincing of what? Even if people think Republicans are the right choice, and doesn't make that any more or any less true 😉
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Republicans control the White House, the Senate and the House of Reps. That's pretty convincing.

Convincing of what? Even if people think Republicans are the right choice, and doesn't make that any more or any less true 😉

exactly, it just means that they can lie better than democrats . . .
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

Indeed. Real problems come in when being defeated in a popular election makes you doubt either yourself or your opinions. I care as little about having 59 million people vote for Bush as I do about 55 million people, along with me, voting for Kerry. Elections don't decide the validity of opinions, and I would say the same thing even if Kerry had won.
Agreed -- November 2nd, 2004 was an indictment of Kerry, not of liberalism. If you think otherwise, you're clearly reading too much into it.
 
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

"soundly defeated" is a bit much. it was a close race, and the latest opinion polls show that the public is still pretty much ambivalent about Bush's leadership.

President Bush: Favorability Ratings


Zogby America Poll. Nov. 16-19, 2004. N=1,052 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.1.

.

"Please tell me if your overall opinion of George W. Bush is very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, very unfavorable, or you are not familiar enough to form an opinion."

Favorable 58%
Unfavororable 40%
Not Familiar/Not Sure 2%






 
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

"soundly defeated" is a bit much. it was a close race, and the latest opinion polls show that the public is still pretty much ambivalent about Bush's leadership.

President Bush: Favorability Ratings


Zogby America Poll. Nov. 16-19, 2004. N=1,052 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.1.

.

"Please tell me if your overall opinion of George W. Bush is very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable, very unfavorable, or you are not familiar enough to form an opinion."

Favorable 58%
Unfavororable 40%
Not Familiar/Not Sure 2%

CBS has it as Favorable: 48%, Unfavorable: 42%, NS: 8%
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: bay
Obviously this is just another attempt by some neocon to stoke the flames.

There is a difference between book smart/literate and having a comprehensive idea of current events. The fact that over 50% of people still think Iraq was responsible for 9/11 proves that people are not getting the right education. Maybe people should stop getting their information from FoxNews.

More typical liberal BS. Iraq was COMPLETELY responsible for 9/11 and you pansies know it. You just didn't want your friends in France getting exposed while Iraq sits there killing innocent civilians.

edit: and hacking our internets :|



This is a perfect example ..... hope that was sarcasm.
 
Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: bay
Obviously this is just another attempt by some neocon to stoke the flames.

There is a difference between book smart/literate and having a comprehensive idea of current events. The fact that over 50% of people still think Iraq was responsible for 9/11 proves that people are not getting the right education. Maybe people should stop getting their information from FoxNews.

More typical liberal BS. Iraq was COMPLETELY responsible for 9/11 and you pansies know it. You just didn't want your friends in France getting exposed while Iraq sits there killing innocent civilians.

edit: and hacking our internets :|



This is a perfect example ..... hope that was sarcasm.

I think it was 😉
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Liberals claim that Americans are becoming increasingly obtuse, superstitious, and malleable. Yet the American public is better educated now that at any time in our nation's history.

Just 60 years ago, more than 50% of Americans had an eighth grade education of less.

How do you libbies explain the disconnect between what you say and believe and reality?

Please provide a link to where the "Liberals" claimed this?

 
Originally posted by: Riprorin

I said "a lot", I didn't say all liberals. I don't see many of you moderate liberals here criticizing the extremists amongst us. Stand and up and be counted!
OK consider yourself criticized!
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin
I'm glad some of you extremists liberals here can still laugh after being so soundly defeated at the polls.

It's healthy, really.

The libs weren't the ones soundly defeated. Bush LOST by a landslide. In a few weeks/months you will no longer be able to deny this.

 
Back
Top