• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Can an American get knighted by the vritish queen?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! such backwardness!!

now I know you are an F-tard!
 
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! such backwardness!!

please do some actual research before spouting off your retarded opinions on things you know nothing about.
 
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! such backwardness!!

now I know you are an F-tard!

No he's spot on. Also, why do we have a king of beer in a democracy? Miller for president. Even back in the 50's we shouldn't have had "The King". I can't believe he was never arrested. I'm also eyeing B. B. King carefully.
 
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! i don't even pretend to understand what the fvck i'm talking about, but will carry on making a complete ass of myself anyway!!

Fixed.

[Edit] Motion for giant bitchslap.
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes.

They are inherently better than everyone else by virture of their noble blood.
 
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! such backwardness!!

now I know you are an F-tard!

No he's spot on. Also, why do we have a king of beer in a democracy? Miller for president. Even back in the 50's we shouldn't have had "The King". I can't believe he was never arrested. I'm also eyeing B. B. King carefully.
Martin Luther King's assisination makes sense to me now...
 
And I think you need to okay it with your federal government too. I think some Canuck got knighted a while back and our gov't got pissed cause they didn't know about it. It wasn't a huge deal, but the gov't people said they would give their permission but would like to be notified first. Something like that anyways.
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Ah, another classic Hatim thread.

Pretty soon he is going to start talking about how he wants to kill homosexuals and atheists.

Here's hoping the Mods arrive shortly after bearing tazers.
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
So you're saying Sir Mix-A-Lot isn't really a knight?
That's true, he's not a "real" knight. However, his title did grant him a few street corners and some ho's in lieu of his castle and serfs.
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?


hence I asked the question
1. royal = status getting lower.
2. royal = any british
3. African =! any british or american. Why?

I was reading the documentary about the famine in Eightopia. The world managed to accumalate a whopping 1/4 billlion dollars. Compare that with the amount of $ spent by the US alone on IRAQ. Instead of saving millions of lives in Africa, they are using the money to kill :/
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?


hence I asked the question
1. royal = status getting lower.
2. royal = any british
3. African =! any british or american. Why?

What the bloody hell are you talking about?
At least rephrase the "question" into something other than complete gibberish.

I was reading the documentary about the famine in Eightopia. The world managed to accumalate a whopping 1/4 billlion dollars. Compare that with the amount of $ spent by the US alone on IRAQ. Instead of saving millions of lives in Africa, they are using the money to kill :/

Pity you didn't read it well enough to remember that it's Ethiopia.
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Pity you didn't read it well enough to remember that it's Ethiopia.

Pity to know that all you people care about is typos!

That's a pretty serious typo. You typing with your wang?

Also, are you going to rephrase your gibberish into a question or not?
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?


hence I asked the question
1. royal = status getting lower.
2. royal = any british
3. African =! any british or american. Why?

I was reading the documentary about the famine in Eightopia. The world managed to accumalate a whopping 1/4 billlion dollars. Compare that with the amount of $ spent by the US alone on IRAQ. Instead of saving millions of lives in Africa, they are using the money to kill :/

The US self-interest does not rest in saving the lives of starving ethopians. The state still reigns supreme.
 
Originally posted by: hatim
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?


hence I asked the question
1. royal = status getting lower.
2. royal = any british
3. African =! any british or american. Why?

I was reading the documentary about the famine in Eightopia. The world managed to accumalate a whopping 1/4 billlion dollars. Compare that with the amount of $ spent by the US alone on IRAQ. Instead of saving millions of lives in Africa, they are using the money to kill :/

May I be the first to complement your country on its forward thinking society and roundly humanitarian approach to foreign relations?
 
Originally posted by: Dopefiend
Originally posted by: hatim
Pity you didn't read it well enough to remember that it's Ethiopia.

Pity to know that all you people care about is typos!

That's a pretty serious typo. You typing with your wang?

Also, are you going to rephrase your gibberish into a question or not?


I shall do it for you.

Now that you realzie that the british royal family is like any british, then why arent africans? Because seriosuly if youve been there you will no seriously how the world is ingnoring them. They waste their money on stopping Asia from progressing instead of having a closer look on Africa. If the all people in this world are equal then I would rather see a few americans/british/pakis die than a million Africans. +they are killing civilians in Iraq. To top of the first sin of of not saving Africa from going into disaster they kill civilians in other parts of the world. Honestly speaking only the US has the resources to save Africa. Its a pity they dont have a will.

In this age its more like a battle between humanity and the non-existence of it. IE terrorists. Africa is a much bigger threat. So we must save that first!
 
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: hatim
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: hatim
Why should the royal family get more benefits than the ordinary mortal? :| Just becuase they were born that way?

Yes. Why should you get more benefits than the starving people in Africa, because you were born into your family? How old are you anyways?


hence I asked the question
1. royal = status getting lower.
2. royal = any british
3. African =! any british or american. Why?

I was reading the documentary about the famine in Eightopia. The world managed to accumalate a whopping 1/4 billlion dollars. Compare that with the amount of $ spent by the US alone on IRAQ. Instead of saving millions of lives in Africa, they are using the money to kill :/

May I be the first to complement your country on its forward thinking society and roundly humanitarian approach to foreign relations?

Its not much fun in having a military dictator choose what foreign policy we have 🙁 ..anyways "our" country has to save itself first before helping others.
 
Originally posted by: hatim
And why the fvck does the fuedal system still exist? Some laws have to get passed through the house of lords!!! such backwardness!!

And why the fvck does the hindu caste system still exist? Such backwardness!!
 
Back
Top