Folks who live in flood-prone areas are expected to buy flood insurance...or not have any damage covered. Folks who live in earthquake-prone areas are expected to buy earthquake insurance...or not have any damage covered...WHY don't we expect people who live in hurricane-prone areas to have hurricane insurance to cover any damage? (aside from the flooding damages, high wind and heavy rain cause a lot of damage...and requiring specific hurricane insurance would take a lot of the costs off the flood insurance agencies...and homeowner's insurance agencies.
Same for tornado damages. Live in Tornado Alley? Pony up for tornado insurance...or don't get coverage when the next F4 rips through your neighborhood.
A couple of things. Hurricane Insurance isn't a thing. To be protected from a hurricane you need Windstorm Insurance which covers wind damage and wind driven water, AND Flood insurance to protect from storm surge and rain driven flooding. (If you have both and your home is damaged from wind and storm surge have fun hiring attorneys and structural engineers to prove what happened because flood ins will claim the damage is Windstorm and Windstorm will claim its flood and neither will pay out)
Windstorm in Texas coastal counties is almost entirely run by a state program. Flood is through the federal flood insurance program.
In coastal counties mortgage companies force you to have Windstorm. They do not force you to have flood if you are outside a 100year flood plain.
About half the homeowners I helped did not have flood insurance which is what Harvey required.
One guy told me he asked to buy flood but was talked out of it by his agent. "Your in a 500 year flood plain. Save yourself the $400-$500 per year cost."
Now it's their fault for not buying it. But it still sucks that insurance agents are pushing people away from it.
Flood insurance isn't really a profit center for insurance companies. It's just more work. So why do it?