- Sep 30, 2000
- 3,148
- 0
- 0
1st:sorry about the wrong forum stuff, i haven't notice there is a section call "the war and the middle east"
2nd:supersix, i never say the USA suck, so stop twisting my word.
3rd:before the war start, i see so many arrogant people post that war on iraq would be over in a week. I just want to see what do they think now. because in my opinion, iraq has put out a good fight.
4th: yo, if it's doing very well, then why is Bush bring more troops to Iraq? perhaps current allie forces in iraq MAY not be enough to win the war, and Bush need the backup.
BTW LeeTJ, to say what you say, you must think Canadian present in WW1 and WW2 doesn't really make difference.
yo, i see you are really into pacman, you must have really high score. I wasn't the one that say the war is gonna be over in a week, because we have all the high tech stuff, and iraq is weaker then 1991.
Rudder, when you take break from that pacman game, listen to this, the allie force is not fight iraq army with civilians in the middle yet.
Right now, allie face a tough resistance from iraq army in the desert battle field.
Before the war, alot of people are saying iraq army force can't touch allie's army, and how useless iraq army is....etc
comment like iraq T-72, T62 are useless against the M1 tank, and how apache would kill the iraq tanks before iraq can open fire...
comment like allie's bombers and tanks, will walk over the iraq's useless army like leafs, and war is gonna be over in a week...
i am not a pro iraq, but i think alot of trash talker should get the facts, because iraq may lose this war, but their fighting spirits has made you look stupid.
Originally posted by: SuperSix
Gee we haven't overthrown an entire country in 8 days! WE SUCK!
Jackass
2nd:supersix, i never say the USA suck, so stop twisting my word.
3rd:before the war start, i see so many arrogant people post that war on iraq would be over in a week. I just want to see what do they think now. because in my opinion, iraq has put out a good fight.
Originally posted by: LeeTJ
btw, chuckie, our armed forces are doing VERY well thank you. It's never easy to invade.
BTW, contrary to your childish thinking, the expertise of the canadians wouldn't make any difference.
4th: yo, if it's doing very well, then why is Bush bring more troops to Iraq? perhaps current allie forces in iraq MAY not be enough to win the war, and Bush need the backup.
BTW LeeTJ, to say what you say, you must think Canadian present in WW1 and WW2 doesn't really make difference.
Originally posted by rudder: How would you propose to get at the iraqi military without killing large number of civilians? go back to playing pacman.
yo, i see you are really into pacman, you must have really high score. I wasn't the one that say the war is gonna be over in a week, because we have all the high tech stuff, and iraq is weaker then 1991.
Rudder, when you take break from that pacman game, listen to this, the allie force is not fight iraq army with civilians in the middle yet.
Right now, allie face a tough resistance from iraq army in the desert battle field.
Before the war, alot of people are saying iraq army force can't touch allie's army, and how useless iraq army is....etc
comment like iraq T-72, T62 are useless against the M1 tank, and how apache would kill the iraq tanks before iraq can open fire...
comment like allie's bombers and tanks, will walk over the iraq's useless army like leafs, and war is gonna be over in a week...
i am not a pro iraq, but i think alot of trash talker should get the facts, because iraq may lose this war, but their fighting spirits has made you look stupid.