- Jul 3, 2003
- 74,567
- 969
- 126
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AH5DC20091118
I own one TV like this and I've often wondered how efficient these things are. People sure have been buying them up like crazy so it has to affect energy usage.
I don't think it's a bad thing.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - California regulators on Wednesday gave final approval to the nation's first mandatory energy curbs on television sets, a growing but often-overlooked power drain that accounts for 10 percent of home electric bills in the state.
Supporters say the measure will save California consumers more than $8 billion over 10 years in electricity costs and enough energy to power 864,000 homes. California often leads the way in environmental initiatives in the United States.
The rules require all new TVs sold in California to consume 33 percent less energy than current sets starting with the 2011 model year, and 50 percent less starting with 2013 models.
This is expected to set a new industry standard for TV manufacturers everywhere by virtue of California's sheer size as a consumer market. An industry trade group says the rules could force some TV sets off the market in California.
The regulatory move was sparked in part by the recent surge in popularity of larger flat-screen televisions that gobble up on average at least 40 percent more electricity than the old-style cathode ray tube, or CRT, sets.
"This is a consumer-protection measure, this is a measure that will protect the environment ... and the benefits to Californians will begin to be felt almost immediately," agency chair Karen Douglas said before the California Energy Commission unanimously adopted the rules.
INDUSTRY RESISTS REGULATIONS
The regulations were opposed by some in the consumer electronics industry as unnecessary, costly for TV makers and consumers and at odds with a voluntary nationwide labeling program, Energy Star, administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The Consumer Electronics Association has said a fourth of all TV sets for sale today would fall short of the standards and would have to be pulled from the market.
Under pressure from some retailers, the commission scaled back its original proposal and exempted the very biggest TV screens, those larger than 58 inches in diagonal. But those mega-sized screens account for no more than 2 percent of all televisions sold, the commission says.
The rule was adopted against the backdrop of a larger state effort to cut heat-trapping greenhouse gas pollutants by 28 percent by 2020. Public utilities, which backed the measure, estimate it will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 3 million metric tons over a decade.
Nearly three years in the making, the measure is the latest in a long line of energy efficiency regulations pioneered by the California Energy Commission for a appliances ranging from refrigerators to cell-phone chargers.
CRT screens still make up the bulk of the estimated 35 million sets in California homes today. But they are rapidly being replaced by flat-panel models, mostly liquid crystal display, or LCD. They account for nearly 90 percent of the 4 million new TVs sold each year.
Supporters say the most energy-gulping models will be replaced by more efficient sets before the new rules take effect, leaving consumers plenty of choice. They also say lower electric bills will more than offset any price hikes.
The commission said more than 1,000 TV models now on the market already meet the 2011 standards.
I own one TV like this and I've often wondered how efficient these things are. People sure have been buying them up like crazy so it has to affect energy usage.
I don't think it's a bad thing.