Red Dawn
Elite Member
Could be worse, could be living in NY!Originally posted by: Anubis
hahahahahahahaha sucks for you
Could be worse, could be living in NY!Originally posted by: Anubis
hahahahahahahaha sucks for you
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Could be worse, could be living in NY!Originally posted by: Anubis
hahahahahahahaha sucks for you
Sucks to be you I guess?!?!?!Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Could be worse, could be living in NY!Originally posted by: Anubis
hahahahahahahaha sucks for you
i dont live there im in Pa. and teh City sucks balls anyway. in NY im 6 hours from there
Yes. When it's PER YEAR.Originally posted by: Syringer
Is an additonal $600 or so make that much when it's a $40,000 car?
Originally posted by: manly
If that's what it takes to plug the budget chasm, then fine.
Unless you prefer the GOP plan that wanted 100,000 kids eligible to start kindergarten to wait until NEXT YEAR and still wasn't balanced after the usual accounting tricks.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: manly
If that's what it takes to plug the budget chasm, then fine.
Unless you prefer the GOP plan that wanted 100,000 kids eligible to start kindergarten to wait until NEXT YEAR and still wasn't balanced after the usual accounting tricks.
No, that is NOT FINE!!! Those fvckers in Sacramento need to reduce spending. They increased spending by a greater margin than tax revenues increased over the past 3+ years. That is why we have such a huge deficit.
Joe Davis (his name isn't Gray-that must be an alias or his stance on most issues) and the rest of the hippie doofuses in the legislature must go, they do NOT represent the people. They represent special interest and themselves only.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
i don't like paying new taxes, but come on, this is small potatoes for most drivers. you've got people in BMW's bitching about paying a car tax that's less than the luxury tax they didn't think twice about when they bought the car. and "poor" people won't be affected because it only affects new cars. so i fail to see how this is a big hardship for anyone.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: manly
If that's what it takes to plug the budget chasm, then fine.
Unless you prefer the GOP plan that wanted 100,000 kids eligible to start kindergarten to wait until NEXT YEAR and still wasn't balanced after the usual accounting tricks.
No, that is NOT FINE!!! Those fvckers in Sacramento need to reduce spending. They increased spending by a greater margin than tax revenues increased over the past 3+ years. That is why we have such a huge deficit.
Joe Davis (his name isn't Gray-that must be an alias or his stance on most issues) and the rest of the hippie doofuses in the legislature must go, they do NOT represent the people. They represent special interest and themselves only.
right, cheaper registration on your new Ford is more important than education for our children. kindly remove your head from your ass.
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: manly
If that's what it takes to plug the budget chasm, then fine.
Unless you prefer the GOP plan that wanted 100,000 kids eligible to start kindergarten to wait until NEXT YEAR and still wasn't balanced after the usual accounting tricks.
No, that is NOT FINE!!! Those fvckers in Sacramento need to reduce spending. They increased spending by a greater margin than tax revenues increased over the past 3+ years. That is why we have such a huge deficit.
Joe Davis (his name isn't Gray-that must be an alias or his stance on most issues) and the rest of the hippie doofuses in the legislature must go, they do NOT represent the people. They represent special interest and themselves only.
right, cheaper registration on your new Ford is more important than education for our children. kindly remove your head from your ass.
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: manly
If that's what it takes to plug the budget chasm, then fine.
Unless you prefer the GOP plan that wanted 100,000 kids eligible to start kindergarten to wait until NEXT YEAR and still wasn't balanced after the usual accounting tricks.
No, that is NOT FINE!!! Those fvckers in Sacramento need to reduce spending. They increased spending by a greater margin than tax revenues increased over the past 3+ years. That is why we have such a huge deficit.
Joe Davis (his name isn't Gray-that must be an alias or his stance on most issues) and the rest of the hippie doofuses in the legislature must go, they do NOT represent the people. They represent special interest and themselves only.
right, cheaper registration on your new Ford is more important than education for our children. kindly remove your head from your ass.
The "wont somebody please think of the children?!?!" argument is old and tired. No one is falling for it anymore.
The fact of the matter is, tax rates should never have to go up... unless spending is increased. The CA state government spent the windfalls of the tech boom by creating billions of dollars in new spending rather than banking that money for the inevitable bust. The quick and simple way to remedy this is to roll back that spending. And, of course, kids were being educated just fine before that new spending started, and will continue to be educated after it's rolled back.
Originally posted by: rgwalt
They should do away with the car (property) taxes around the country. If you have to pay taxes on property you own, then you don't really own it...
R
Originally posted by: oog
Originally posted by: rgwalt
They should do away with the car (property) taxes around the country. If you have to pay taxes on property you own, then you don't really own it...
R
Reducing property taxes is part of what put California in the budget problems it is currently in. Prop 13 limited the yearly increases on property taxes, and made it much more reliant on income taxes as a result. With the drop in income taxes (because of the generally poor economy for the past couple of years), California just hasn't been able to collect as much as it projected.
I agree..Originally posted by: rgwalt
Originally posted by: oog
Originally posted by: rgwalt
They should do away with the car (property) taxes around the country. If you have to pay taxes on property you own, then you don't really own it...
R
Reducing property taxes is part of what put California in the budget problems it is currently in. Prop 13 limited the yearly increases on property taxes, and made it much more reliant on income taxes as a result. With the drop in income taxes (because of the generally poor economy for the past couple of years), California just hasn't been able to collect as much as it projected.
That isn't my point. My point relates to the concept of ownership. If the government can take my car or my house away because I didn't pay my taxes, then I don't really OWN my car or my house.
R
Originally posted by: Eli
I agree..Originally posted by: rgwalt
Originally posted by: oog
Originally posted by: rgwalt
They should do away with the car (property) taxes around the country. If you have to pay taxes on property you own, then you don't really own it...
R
Reducing property taxes is part of what put California in the budget problems it is currently in. Prop 13 limited the yearly increases on property taxes, and made it much more reliant on income taxes as a result. With the drop in income taxes (because of the generally poor economy for the past couple of years), California just hasn't been able to collect as much as it projected.
That isn't my point. My point relates to the concept of ownership. If the government can take my car or my house away because I didn't pay my taxes, then I don't really OWN my car or my house.
R
Actually, I should've said more than what I did.. I do understand these concepts, and did actually mean to mention that the government has to make money somehow, I just agreed with his sentiment.Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Eli
I agree..Originally posted by: rgwalt
Originally posted by: oog
Originally posted by: rgwalt
They should do away with the car (property) taxes around the country. If you have to pay taxes on property you own, then you don't really own it...
R
Reducing property taxes is part of what put California in the budget problems it is currently in. Prop 13 limited the yearly increases on property taxes, and made it much more reliant on income taxes as a result. With the drop in income taxes (because of the generally poor economy for the past couple of years), California just hasn't been able to collect as much as it projected.
That isn't my point. My point relates to the concept of ownership. If the government can take my car or my house away because I didn't pay my taxes, then I don't really OWN my car or my house.
R
Then neither one of you understand government. You make a contract with them by using their services(i.e. their roads, infrastructure, and other services). Don't pay and you can have them go "after" you aka put a lien on your home or foreclose. Same deal with any commercial entity. Government has more power than a typical business(read civil asset seizure laws/environmental seizure laws) but MOST of the time... not paying your taxes SHOULD be grounds for a lien or seizure. Unless you are using no services(not possible because the military keeps us all safe) then you don't have a reason to bitch about paying taxes. Now, you can bitch about the AMOUNT(they are too high) but the fact that you have to PAY them at all shouldn't be an issue. The military and other things aren't free. They all have to have money to operate.
California is one of about 20 states facing shortfalls because of the economic downtown and increased spending. Part of it is the fault of government, and part of it is the fault of the people. Lots of these increases were supported by the people because they fault the economy would continue to stay strong, and that the new programs were "needed" since we had increased revenue and surpluses.
Don't blame only your local politicians; the uninformed voter is guilty as well.