irishScott
Lifer
- Oct 10, 2006
- 21,568
- 3
- 0
Meh, generals was fun. Nothing incredible or groundbreaking, but fun. Generals 2 with an updated engine? I'd give it a look. Might be one of those games I buy when it drops to $30 or lower.
Bioware was bought in 2007.
Yes, and we all knew what was coming but things didn't really start clearly going downhill until ME2.
I never said that was Bioware's biggest fuckup. ME2 is definitely the first game where you can clearly see where things are changing for the worse though. also, lol @ 94 score.
Expect other EA properties and studios to use the engine as well. In face EA already released another game using it, the latest in the Need for Speed series.
I could use another Dune RTS.
Ah, I loved playing Dune 2 on my 486 DX2 66MHz PC back in the early 90s. I put more time into that RTS than probably any other game.
I can't keep up with their studio name changes.
Maybe that's their strategy so we can't tell which studios kick ass and which ones are shitty.
Yeah Dune II got a ton of playtime when I was a kid.
And Emperor Battle For Dune was an enjoyable "modern" version of the Dune experience.
Would love a modern, visually-striking Dune release.
I hate generals it was the beginning of the slippery slope that killed C&C. It was mildly fun to play online though and at least it didnt screw with the main storylines of C&C because it had nothing to do with either of them.
However... a strategy game... and powered by frostbite 2 engine? Thats 8 threads as long as they dont gimp it! Im very interested in how this pans out, could be epic!
really?
I loved generals, I thought it was great gameplay wise
EA is just using the Bioware name because it has not been tainted yet, unlike Westwood and Origin Systems.
EA is just using the Bioware name because it has not been tainted yet, unlike Westwood and Origin Systems.