• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Buttons in cars better than touch screen

Touch-screens are fine for systems you set once or twice and then occasionally adjust plus are not "mission-critical". (unless it's a small "dedicated" touch-screen with a single function)

Every control that does anything related to controlling the vehicle or seeing out of the vehicle should have its own DISCREET and easy to use "by feel" control.

Placing 95% of all controls on a huge tablet stuck on the dashboard (often 2-3 menu-taps deep!) is freaking stupid, lazy design and nothing else.
 
Last edited:
There are some things a touch screen can do well, replace as many physical buttons as possible just because they can is not one of them.

Another reason not to buy Tesla. That's the direction they seem to be going
 
Yeah I am not a fan of the removal of dials for touch only or majority touch interfaces in cars. Seems to be a fad that no one other than the car designers wanted. (Although I think the head designer of Kia or something said they would keep most of them)
 
Lost_in_the_HTTP said:
There should not be 'screens' at all.

Wassamatter with dials?
Click to expand...
Why not both? My 2015 VW has a good mix, I can do everything I need to do (HVAC, wipers, basic stereo controls, etc) without the screen, but the screen serves useful functions as well.
Captante said:
Backup camera's come in pretty dang handy and provided the screen can be turned OFF at night they're helpful for entertainment.... otherwise I agree.
Click to expand...
The Jeep I rented in May was terribly stupid about that, the onboard GPS didn't automatically go into a "night mode" the way literally every other GPS I've used does (and I couldn't find a setting to turn night mode on), the brightness couldn't be turned down as much as I wanted, and even when you turned the screen "off" the freaking backlight was still on. All this from a $45-55k SUV.
 
spaceman said:
I agree have had 3 vehicle with touch screens and it’s annoying af
Click to expand...


The best I've had was in a decked out 2016 Camry XLE I had as an extended rental while my Scion was getting fixed.

It had large easy menus and a physical "on/off" button on the bottom left edge in easy reach of the driver ... it even had a tiny "location" light on the button for when the screen was dark. (plus since it was a Toyota it was made of the same "industructium" as the rest of the car!)

I'd still prefer a plain old dial and buttons though. 🙁
 
Last edited:
As has been said, and I agree, a combination is fine. I think that buttons/dials should absolutely stay for frequently needed items (eg, temp controls). My wife's car (a newer Volvo) took it too far and does almost everything on the touchscreen; I hate it. Funnily enough, I see the winner was an old Volvo. Hopefully they will address it in their newer models.
 
When did this crap start, so I know which model years to avoid? I had an '89 Cougar with a digital dash, but it was just bars and gauges, no screens.
 
The first cars to have touch-screens were GM's in the late 1980's and early 1990's believe it or not but it was nothing like today.

The real "madness" didn't start until after 2009-2010 or so and now we've reached the point where it's harder to avoid a screen in your new car then it is to find one with a manual transmission!
 
I don't mind the two touch screens in my car, but I too like buttons for the most used buttons. I feel like I have the best of both worlds because the AC/Heat still have buttons and there is a volume knob. I really don't use the volume knob often because the steering wheel controls are more convenient.

I will say, I tried to go the whole iPad as a remote for my Home Theater. Worst decision ever. It's freaking horrible! Not having physical buttons on a "remote", in the dark, sucks. You have to turn on the screen and look at it. I gave that up real quick and moved on to URC remotes. They are amazing if you have the software to program them. They won't give it out the software and want you to use an installer, screw that, I can program my own remote and save a thousand dollars to have someone program my dang remote. The software isn't too hard to find though.
 
Captante said:
The first cars to have touch-screens were GM's in the late 1980's and early 1990's believe it or not but it was nothing like today.

The real "madness" didn't start until after 2009-2010 or so and now we've reached the point where it's harder to avoid a screen in your new car then it is to find one with a manual transmission!
Click to expand...
The Buick Reatta's touch screen was kinda neat.
 
The Rise of Touch Screens in Cars Explained

Riviera1en.jpg
 
Every button that could ever conceivably be in a car is better as a button rather than some dumb touch screen crap. And there should be like a max button limit for cars as well. Like over 10 or 15 or some shit the car markers owe some extra tax to the government.
 
Not a fan of this trend of everything being touch screens either. In newer Teslas you actually have to drill through touch screen menus just to put it in reverse! Like how dumb is that.

Important functions absolutely shouldn't be touch screen, what happens if that touch screen dies? 20 years down the line chances are that part won't be available. But if it was a mechanical button at least you can jerry rig something if the button breaks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top