Jeff7
Lifer
- Jan 4, 2001
- 41,599
- 19
- 81
Of course, gorilla penises are tiny compared to ours. Maybe try a dolphin instead?:QOriginally posted by: Red Dawn
This is what should happen to him and all the other pervs that prey on children
Of course, gorilla penises are tiny compared to ours. Maybe try a dolphin instead?:QOriginally posted by: Red Dawn
This is what should happen to him and all the other pervs that prey on children
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Steller judges of character you two are, not.
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Steller judges of character you two are, not.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I stand by my assessment. I do not think Ward is a perv. I think he was doing exactly what he said he was, investigating the world of child porn. I think what you know about Ward you could put in a thimble. I have been listening to him for years. In shout, you are a shallow know nothing who is happy to condemn without any knowledge and I have watched him work for the disadvantaged and poor for years and years. I have seen an investigative reporter and person of great humanity, filled with compassion and real Christian spirit. It will take a lot more than some emails to convince me he is guilty of anything but what he has said. It's going to be interesting to see what happens when this comes to trial.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I stand by my assessment. I do not think Ward is a perv. I think he was doing exactly what he said he was, investigating the world of child porn. I think what you know about Ward you could put in a thimble. I have been listening to him for years. In shout, you are a shallow know nothing who is happy to condemn without any knowledge and I have watched him work for the disadvantaged and poor for years and years. I have seen an investigative reporter and person of great humanity, filled with compassion and real Christian spirit. It will take a lot more than some emails to convince me he is guilty of anything but what he has said. It's going to be interesting to see what happens when this comes to trial.
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
You mean like Newt cheating on his wife while he was busy trying to impeach Clinton for cheating on his wife?
Both sides of the political spectrum have there fair share of low-lifes, but the GOP seems to have so many more of them.... and in ELECTED positions to boot. The partisian hacks see this as an opprtunity to try and "take back some ground" as it were.
Again, this guy is NOT an elected official. He's lost his job AND is being prosecuted. What more do you want?
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, not for cheating on his wife.
Only a true liberal like yourself would put distributing child porn and cheating on your wife in the same category.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Steller judges of character you two are, not.
I stand by my assessment. I do not think Ward is a perv. I think he was doing exactly what he said he was, investigating the world of child porn. I think what you know about Ward you could put in a thimble. I have been listening to him for years. In shout, you are a shallow know nothing who is happy to condemn without any knowledge and I have watched him work for the disadvantaged and poor for years and years. I have seen an investigative reporter and person of great humanity, filled with compassion and real Christian spirit. It will take a lot more than some emails to convince me he is guilty of anything but what he has said. It's going to be interesting to see what happens when this comes to trial.
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Steller judges of character you two are, not.
Your a beter judge of character???
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Only a stupid little twit or a political hack wouldn't be able to see what i'm talking about. Too bad for you, but you obviously qualify on both of those points.
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think the chances this guy is a pedophile are slim to none. Everything about this guy that I can see radiates 'fine human being'. I can't think this can be anything other than a witch hunt by some very vicious and vindictive people. Ward is a powerful and cogent critic of the right who simply demolishes the idiots on the right who call in to his show. And he rips up the Democrats too, especially Nancy Pelosi.
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on this (if the law is too broad and captures innocent activity, that's another issue we'll see about).
Steller judges of character you two are, not.
Your a beter judge of character???
Maybe, maybe not. I've seen enough angels fall in my lifetime to know anyone is capable of anything.
Originally posted by: eskimospy
I don't think frivolous means what you think it means. And what's up with the Baghdad by the Bay thing? Not only is San Francisco an amazing city, but Muslim nations are usually very socially conservative, not liberal... so that doesn't make much sense. That, and I think the quote meant it in a pejorative sense, but Baghdad is now the seat of our 'allies' in Iraq?
That whole name calling thing just didn't seem very well thought out.
Caen gained fame with his column "It's News to Me," which was first published July 5, 1938. His columns were known for their dry wit and his intimate knowledge of the happenings in his city. Caen had a considerable influence on pop culture and its language; most notably, he coined the term "beatnik" in his April 2, 1958 column [1] and popularized the word "hippie" during San Francisco's 1967 Summer of Love. He also playfully popularized many other (if more obscure) concepts and terms, such as Frisbeetarianism. To reflect the multiculturalism and exotic character of San Francisco he coined the term Baghdad by the Bay, and often referred to San Francisco that way.
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Only a stupid little twit or a political hack wouldn't be able to see what i'm talking about. Too bad for you, but you obviously qualify on both of those points.
Most who have no real argument to make, end up lowering themselves to personal attacks. Congrats. Any mods around here?
Again, this guy is NOT an elected official. He's lost his job AND is being prosecuted. What more do you want?
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Only a stupid little twit or a political hack wouldn't be able to see what i'm talking about. Too bad for you, but you obviously qualify on both of those points.
Most who have no real argument to make, end up lowering themselves to personal attacks. Congrats. Any mods around here?
Are you crying for protection? ROFLMAO@U!!!! You poor tightie righties, it's all a liberal conspiracy, isn't it.
Why don't you try answering the question I asked of you, or is it too hard for your peanut brain to comprehend? Hell I'll even make it easy for you. Here it is:
Again, this guy is NOT an elected official. He's lost his job AND is being prosecuted. What more do you want?
Now try keeping to the subject instead of drifiting off on your ongoing attempts at trying to put words in other people's mouth. Either that or STFU!!!!!!!
History has shown that the more sexually repressive and patriarchal a society is ("conservative") the more frequent the sexual abuse of children is, particularly teenage girls by family members. That said, most such abuse is not pedophilia because pedophilia is specifically about pre-pubescent children.Originally posted by: homercles337
This is just more evidence that all liberal, moon-bats are pedophiles. :|
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Only a stupid little twit or a political hack wouldn't be able to see what i'm talking about. Too bad for you, but you obviously qualify on both of those points.
Most who have no real argument to make, end up lowering themselves to personal attacks. Congrats. Any mods around here?
Are you crying for protection? ROFLMAO@U!!!! You poor tightie righties, it's all a liberal conspiracy, isn't it.
Why don't you try answering the question I asked of you, or is it too hard for your peanut brain to comprehend? Hell I'll even make it easy for you. Here it is:
Again, this guy is NOT an elected official. He's lost his job AND is being prosecuted. What more do you want?
Now try keeping to the subject instead of drifiting off on your ongoing attempts at trying to put words in other people's mouth. Either that or STFU!!!!!!!
Actually, you are the one who took the conversation in a whole different direction by trying to somehow equate Newt cheating on his wife to a pedophile.
But to answer your questions, I never wanted anything. I just find it sad that liberals like youself make excuses for this kind of disgusting behavior, or try to margenalize it by comparing it to something much different.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
LOL, so you admit you could care less about this guy and what he allegedly did except that it offers a chance for you to attempt to bash anybody you declare to be an "evul libruhl".
Have so more kool-aid, dumb ass.
Blah blah blah, he does what you do, the difference is that he's not defending either scum while you are defending Newt. Both are scum, one is a manipulative heartless type of scum while the other is a sick twisted in need of phsyciatric help type of scum. Neither should measure up to your morals even as subjective as them may be.Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
LOL, so you admit you could care less about this guy and what he allegedly did except that it offers a chance for you to attempt to bash anybody you declare to be an "evul libruhl".
Have so more kool-aid, dumb ass.
Of course I care what this guy did. He's a sick freak and should be punished accordingly. Of course, all people like yourself want to do is downplay his actions by comparing them to something completely different than the situation this guy is in. Its a typical trait of liberals like yourself. Absolutely smear a republican when he does something you find appauling, then brush it off when the same thing (actually worse in this case) is done by someone of your own political leanings. Its party hackism at its finest.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Blah blah blah, he does what you do, the difference is that he's not defending either scum while you are defending Newt. Both are scum, one is a manipulative heartless type of scum while the other is a sick twisted in need of phsyciatric help type of scum. Neither should measure up to your morals even as subjective as them may be.
Complaining about the moderation is not allowed in this forum. Calling out a Moderator is against the rules and can get you a vacation. I already posted in this thread so I'm not allowed to moderate in it (unless it's an emergency). Any problems you have with the moderation should be addressed to Derek Wilson. Anymore discussion of the moderation by you or any other member in this thread and forum will be brought to the attention of a Moderator who hasn't participated in this thread so he can act without violating any of the Moderator Guidelines.Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Blah blah blah, he does what you do, the difference is that he's not defending either scum while you are defending Newt. Both are scum, one is a manipulative heartless type of scum while the other is a sick twisted in need of phsyciatric help type of scum. Neither should measure up to your morals even as subjective as them may be.
I never defended Newt. I pointed out the fact that they are COMPLETELY different situations that have nothing to do with each other. Of course what Newt did was wrong. But like I said, it has nothing to do with child porn or even NEAR the realm that gets into.
And maybe if you werent so partisan you'd actually do something about the personal attacks he has made in this thread.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Complaining about the moderation is not allowed in this forum. Calling out a Moderator is against the rules and can get you a vacation. I already posted in this thread so I'm not allowed to moderate in it (unless it's an emergency). Any problems you have with the moderation should be addressed to Derek Wilson. Anymore discussion of the moderation by you or any other member in this thread and forum will be brought to the attention of a Moderator who hasn't participated in this thread so he can act without violating any of the Moderator Guidelines.Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Blah blah blah, he does what you do, the difference is that he's not defending either scum while you are defending Newt. Both are scum, one is a manipulative heartless type of scum while the other is a sick twisted in need of phsyciatric help type of scum. Neither should measure up to your morals even as subjective as them may be.
I never defended Newt. I pointed out the fact that they are COMPLETELY different situations that have nothing to do with each other. Of course what Newt did was wrong. But like I said, it has nothing to do with child porn or even NEAR the realm that gets into.
And maybe if you werent so partisan you'd actually do something about the personal attacks he has made in this thread.
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: XMan
Originally posted by: Craig234
I've listened to Bernie Ward for many years. He is a passionate liberal.
I think there's virtually no chance he did anything wrong morally on ...
Weeeeeeeell . . . .
Smoking Gun Link
Craig comes up with a new excuse in 4...3...2...