Originally posted by: jjsole
Not buying into this president's bs and lies is the most patriotic thing you can do.Originally posted by: Oakenfold
It's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country.
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: Oakenfold
It's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country. Of course you could always go live in Iraq, I'm sure you'd fit in pretty well with that logic. 😀Originally posted by: HayabusariderI am a Joe Citizen. I NEVER have to support a President. I prefer to support my country. If I feel they are at cross purposes, then WHOEVER is prez will get lampooned.Originally posted by: Oakenfold I think he did a very good job. Covered all his bases, medicare reform sounds interesting, I bet that there are quite a few attorney's upset over the reform of hospital liability as well! It's time to support this country, he's the president, all you playa haters need to bite it.
Son, I would wager I have contributed more to this country than you. Nevertheless, if you believe you have are obligated to support someone in power, I suggest you would have done well in Germany in the late 1930's.
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: jjsole
Not buying into this president's bs and lies is the most patriotic thing you can do.Originally posted by: Oakenfold
It's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country.
Yes. Tell that to the hawks. They'll tell you you're "anti-American".
Hey , that reminds me...Originally posted by: no0b
Lol the rebuttal is filled with as many lies as the actual address.
Its the president's duty to represent whats best for the people of the United States, and not the people's responsibility to represent whats best for George Bush!!Originally posted by: Oakenfold
But I think it's rather silly to not support the man when he needs it most.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Its the president's duty to represent whats best for the people of the United States, and not the people's responsibility to represent whats best for George Bush!!Originally posted by: Oakenfold
But I think it's rather silly to not support the man when he needs it most.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
The Democratic response was pretty good. It's the economy stupid is as true now as it was in 92.
Originally posted by: Oakenfold
Old man, I never contested what you have contributed to this country, I simply state to stand behind your elected official in his hour of need!Originally posted by: HayabusariderSon, I would wager I have contributed more to this country than you. Nevertheless, if you believe you have are obligated to support someone in power, I suggest you would have done well in Germany in the late 1930's.Originally posted by: OakenfoldIt's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country. Of course you could always go live in Iraq, I'm sure you'd fit in pretty well with that logic. 😀Originally posted by: HayabusariderI am a Joe Citizen. I NEVER have to support a President. I prefer to support my country. If I feel they are at cross purposes, then WHOEVER is prez will get lampooned.Originally posted by: Oakenfold I think he did a very good job. Covered all his bases, medicare reform sounds interesting, I bet that there are quite a few attorney's upset over the reform of hospital liability as well! It's time to support this country, he's the president, all you playa haters need to bite it.
Originally posted by: DukeFan21
Alright, let's say the President lays off on Iraq...if Iraq later down the road unleashes its weapons on the U.S. or any other country for that matter, do you Bush-haters blame him?
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
the state of the union seemed long to me...*yawn*
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: jjsole
Not buying into this president's bs and lies is the most patriotic thing you can do.Originally posted by: Oakenfold
It's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country.
Yes. Tell that to the hawks. They'll tell you you're "anti-American".
![]()
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
the state of the union seemed long to me...*yawn*
I saw some guy in the middle row sleeping.
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: SuperTool
The Democratic response was pretty good. It's the economy stupid is as true now as it was in 92.
Yes, and we will be getting tax cuts of some sort 🙂
You mean one of those weapons from saddam's famous nuclear program that could be within months of a "nucular" bomb that the UN can find no evidence of existing? The end doesn't justify the means, and the means here is special interest not good judgement.Originally posted by: DukeFan21
Alright, let's say the President lays off on Iraq...if Iraq later down the road unleashes its weapons on the U.S. or any other country for that matter, do you Bush-haters blame him?
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: jjsole
Not buying into this president's bs and lies is the most patriotic thing you can do.Originally posted by: Oakenfold
It's your responsibility to support him, that is in fact supporting your country.
Yes. Tell that to the hawks. They'll tell you you're "anti-American".
![]()
Don't deny it...come on...admit it...😀
Actually, the people who warned the Clinton were the same ones who warned the Bush administration, but we can't question that anymore now with the passing of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. act.Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
So what's your point? We don't just go and murder people who haven't done anything to us, or else we would've taken action long ago i areas all over the world. We are a nation of laws, which is why we didn't assasinate MaoTseTung, Ho Chi MInh, Castro, in the years after BayofPigs , Kadafy or Hussein.
It illustrates other world leaders we (the US ) have been at odds with/ in armed conflict with and didn't asassinate them, which, if I followed your rhetoric blaming Clinton for "allowing OBL to escape", is what you would that they have done.WTH does all of that have to do with your rhetoric blaming Bush for the 9/11 attacks?
BTW, as Clinton left office, they PASSED along all data on OBL with the advice to keep an eye on him. That was a year befor the attacks, did they have something else to do??? Get real.
Well, afaik, the CIA/NSA/FBI were staffed with the same people. Bush was focusing on issues within the U.S.'s own borders.