• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Bush's qualifications

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
His resume is stellar compared to anyone on this forum.

You're obviously speaking for yourself.

Bush's resume wouldn't be stellar even if they put it in a friggin' missile and fired it at the Sun.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
You know, I don't have too many brain cells and IQ points as it is, but you new P&N posters are taking the remaining ones down at an alarming rate.

Ck, you have to have IQ points before you can lose them.

Lets just say you dont have anything to worry about. ;P

That's a relief! :beer:

HAHA! :D
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: zendari
His resume is stellar compared to anyone on this forum.

You're obviously speaking for yourself.

Bush's resume wouldn't be stellar even if they put it in a friggin' missile and fired it at the Sun.

Yup, his governor record was SOOOOOOOOOO bad people promoted him to the Presidency!
 

2Xtreme21

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2004
7,044
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: zendari
His resume is stellar compared to anyone on this forum.

You're obviously speaking for yourself.

Bush's resume wouldn't be stellar even if they put it in a friggin' missile and fired it at the Sun.

Yup, his governor record was SOOOOOOOOOO bad people promoted him to the Presidency!

Well that's what billions of dollars in negative campaigning can do for ya.

Edit: Typo.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Bush's resume:

2 term president!


Demoncats' resumes combined:

lost to Bush twice!


these Democrats must be really sore!

 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush's resume:

2 term president!


Demoncats' resumes combined:

lost to Bush twice!


these Democrats must be really sore!

:thumbsup:
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
None of the partisans are going to listen, beccause thats what they are: partisans. Goes for democrats and especially republicans. Everyone here has their mind made up, so whats the point?
 

kuba

Senior member
Sep 11, 2005
298
0
0
Zendari-
"Yes, his father knew in 1991 that his son would be running for president in 2000. Funny how GHWB's other nominee voted against his son too. And what about the 2 clinton justices that Gore undoubtedly had a hand in choosing?"
----------------------------------------------------
no, but it set things up for ANY REPUBLICAN...as is the case now...with the new nominee.
 

kuba

Senior member
Sep 11, 2005
298
0
0
Originally posted by: irwincur
Smart enough to beat the best the Dems could throw at him... TWICE.

Who is stupid...

the ones that voted in the liar :)
 

kuba

Senior member
Sep 11, 2005
298
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush's resume:

2 term president!


Demoncats' resumes combined:

lost to Bush twice!


these Democrats must be really sore!
in a questionable election in FL. (errr Governed by Bush)
taken to Supreme Court, basically "PWNED"(as some of the geeks/dweebs on here would say) by the Republican army....party...sorry :)
 

kuba

Senior member
Sep 11, 2005
298
0
0
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
None of the partisans are going to listen, beccause thats what they are: partisans. Goes for democrats and especially republicans. Everyone here has their mind made up, so whats the point?

my point is, anyone who defends him or voted him in, must really be a few fries short of a happy meal...the guy is an absolute joke and disgrace...to have him as their "leader"
lol...absolute moron. the end. nothing more to be said about the guy...
Mr. Bush, you can go potty now
 

kuba

Senior member
Sep 11, 2005
298
0
0
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: kuba
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
You know, I don't have too many brain cells and IQ points as it is, but you new P&N posters are taking the remaining ones down at an alarming rate.
Kettle meet pot...pot, this is kettle.

kuba, this is the English language.. English language, kuba.

understood...but did you REALLY understand what was implied in what i said? ;)
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: kuba
Zendari-
"Yes, his father knew in 1991 that his son would be running for president in 2000. Funny how GHWB's other nominee voted against his son too. And what about the 2 clinton justices that Gore undoubtedly had a hand in choosing?"
----------------------------------------------------
no, but it set things up for ANY REPUBLICAN...as is the case now...with the new nominee.

How does it matter when they voted 1-1 for each candidate? Both of Clinton's appointments sided with Gore.

I guess Clinton was setting up the Courts to select more Democrats in the future, eh?
 

OneOfTheseDays

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2000
7,052
0
0
I could care less if the Democrats lost, the fact of the matter is the American people lost. We got stuck with a reckless administration that has pushed this nation into some of the worst debts it has ever seen with no end in sight. We are stuck in a gigantic quagmire with this whole Iraq situation, and quite frankly even the best military analysts say the whole thing is a crapshoot after 3 years. I wonder just how Bush could his reputation as a strong and decisive leader, if you look at every major disaster to hit this country he has responded absolutely poorly. This man's accomplishments as president are far and few between, and he will be remembered as a failure by all historians. You can mark my words on that one.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: JacobJ
GenX87 and CKGunslinger:

Neither of you have contributed anything of substance to this discussion.

Of course not, what can they possibly say? It's good that ~20,000 people in Iraq, on both sides, are dead for absolutely no reason? That Bush's continued inability to say "nuclear" means his IQ is over 75? Insulting you is the only legitimate way they can post anything. I'd suggest ignoring it, delusional people aren't worth the trouble.

Originally posted by: zendari
His resume is stellar compared to anyone on this forum.

And this will matter when anyone on this forum runs for president. Until then, please at least attempt to stay on topic.


I see Bush as a great test; he separates blind partisan hacks from people with an ability to think and reason, the former being the only ones still in support of him. I'm not a liberal nor a democrat; it's the ability to think which makes me hate this warmongering, spendhappy moron.
 

platinumike

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 2004
2,114
3
0
what exactly is on his criminal record? just wondering, cause i heared rumors about a coccaine problem.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
I see Bush as a great test; he separates blind partisan hacks from people with an ability to think and reason, the former being the only ones still in support of him. I'm not a liberal nor a democrat; it's the ability to think which makes me hate this warmongering, spendhappy moron.
Bush is a mere extension of the blind partisanship two party politics that have stagnated growth in this country for the past few decades.

He is a figurehead to an ideology that currently holds the White House...a pendulum swing between left and right, Democrats and Republicans...it seems every couple of years the pendulum swings the other way, with each party having ample opportunity to further screw up the country.

When the left is running the show, the right whines...when the right is running the show, the left whines...the sky is always falling when the other side has control...yet the country continues to move forward.


 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: Starbuck1975
I see Bush as a great test; he separates blind partisan hacks from people with an ability to think and reason, the former being the only ones still in support of him. I'm not a liberal nor a democrat; it's the ability to think which makes me hate this warmongering, spendhappy moron.
Bush is a mere extension of the blind partisanship two party politics that have stagnated growth in this country for the past few decades.

He is a figurehead to an ideology that currently holds the White House...a pendulum swing between left and right, Democrats and Republicans...it seems every couple of years the pendulum swings the other way, with each party having ample opportunity to further screw up the country.

When the left is running the show, the right whines...when the right is running the show, the left whines...the sky is always falling when the other side has control...yet the country continues to move forward.

It's human nature to coalesce into groups for the power of numbers, even if we don't agree with every little thing the group stands for; it's been a survival adaptation for our species. This is the biology behind the political partisanship phenomenon you described. I've seen it myself, being an independant, and watched presidents on both sides come and go with great ambivalence. Bush is different. It's an embarassment to my country that someone so phenomenally stupid could achieve its highest position of power.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: kuba
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: kuba
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
You know, I don't have too many brain cells and IQ points as it is, but you new P&N posters are taking the remaining ones down at an alarming rate.
Kettle meet pot...pot, this is kettle.

kuba, this is the English language.. English language, kuba.

understood...but did you REALLY understand what was implied in what i said? ;)

Well, this is going really off-topic, but seeing as how there was actually no legitimate topic in the OP, all's fair, I suppose.

Considering that the phrase involving the pot and kettle is typically invoked to imply that a stated condition can easily be turned around and applied to the other involved party, I can only assume one of two possible meanings for your usage of said phrase. One, being that *I* am the "new P&N poster" and am bringing down *your* IQ by my postings. But considering that your join date is just over a week old, while mine is sadly approaching its 6-year anniversary, this cannot logically be the case. Which now leaves us with case two: that my implication that I have very few brain cells and IQ points to begin with should thus be turned around and applied to the other party involved in the discussion - namely, you. Therefore, I concede, my dear kuba, I should have implied that you were actually the one in short supply of grey matter instead of selfishly hording that attribute for myself. You have my apologies. It appears I have been pwned, as they say.
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: Sudheer Anne
I could care less if the Democrats lost, the fact of the matter is the American people lost. We got stuck with a reckless administration that has pushed this nation into some of the worst debts it has ever seen with no end in sight. We are stuck in a gigantic quagmire with this whole Iraq situation, and quite frankly even the best military analysts say the whole thing is a crapshoot after 3 years. I wonder just how Bush could his reputation as a strong and decisive leader, if you look at every major disaster to hit this country he has responded absolutely poorly. This man's accomplishments as president are far and few between, and he will be remembered as a failure by all historians. You can mark my words on that one.

And if *that* had been the basic premise of the OP, we could have had some reasonable discussion on the topic, but as it stands, we seem to be stuck with the less-than-eloquent "LMAO - Bush needs to potty!" which is obviously not worthy of anything resembling a dignified answer. And I certainly feel that I've done my personal best to make my responses to this thread as undignified as possible. ;)
 

nutxo

Diamond Member
May 20, 2001
6,824
503
126
Originally posted by: JacobJ
GenX87 and CKGunslinger:

Neither of you have contributed anything of substance to this discussion. So far, all of your posts in this thread contain NO commentary on the subject matter. You then criticise me for deleting a thread overrun by the very same trolling you are engaging in here. Trolling that YOU GenX87 participated in.

As to the original post, while it may not be brilliant and might be a little trollish itself, it makes this forum look hideous to be overrun by trolling.

I personally disagree that bush is an idiot. I believe he is very calculating...but his brilliance comes from appearing to not be calculating at all. Personally, I see in his note a desire to fit follow basic protocols of diplomacy -- one of respect.




fixed typos

You've posted a link to something we've all seen. It's been spammed a 1000 times and you want people to debate it? :clock:

 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush's resume:

2 term president!


Demoncats' resumes combined:

lost to Bush twice!


these Democrats must be really sore!
I like the demoncats :)
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush's resume:

2 term president!


Demoncats' resumes combined:

lost to Bush twice!


these Democrats must be really sore!

Says more about the intelligence of the average voter than the men themselves.