Bush's only got a little bit more to go

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Bush = Hitler? <STRONG>What liberal crapola!!</STRONG>

Hitler was a decorated combat veteran for his country. Hitler not only could read, he wrote books. Hitler was a stirring orator. <STRONG>Finally, Hitler had a least one gonad.</STRONG>

Of course, both ascended to power with a decided minority of the popular vote, and they both named scary ideologues to their cabinets.

Still . . . <STRONG>Bush is no Hitler. :|

</STRONG>After all, Hitler was a self made man!

Err...you mean self-made madman. You left out three letters there.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Yup, etech, if we hadn't fought the Germans abd defeated Hitler, we'd be debating in German right now. Gott in Himmel. Of course in that example we waited till we got attacked before we launched or emptive strike.
Germany attacked the U.S.?

There were two theaters of war in WWII.
Don't mind Moonie, he rewrites history at his pleasure. As such, his daily revision is that Gore won.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,728
6,755
126
No cheep shots please, jjones. You are intelligent enough to know that I know how we got into WW11. Try to find a real issue like the fact that Gore DID win the Florida popular vote according to an independent objective recount of the entire state according to the legal definition of legal votes. :D
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
No cheep shots please, jjones. You are intelligent enough to know that I know how we got into WW11. Try to find a real issue like the fact that Gore DID win the Florida popular vote according to an independent objective recount of the entire state according to the legal definition of legal votes. :D
Oh...come on...your argument's been beaten down already.

Besides, it was 2 1/2 years ago. It's time to move on to more pressing issues that can actually matter.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Jani


Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups.

In case you haven't noticed yet this whole thread and the original article is about comparing Bush and Hitler.
In that case, this whole thread is moot.
 

SpideyCU

Golden Member
Nov 17, 2000
1,402
0
0
Originally posted by: aznparty
Who is George Michael? Is he your secret lover?
Umm...does any sane person need more proof than this that this person isn't mature enough to form a legitimate idea?

This thread was clearly designed as flamebait ("I'm just having some fun!") much like the Intel vs. AMD threads elsewhere. There's no "shocking revelation" contained herein.
 

aznparty

Member
Aug 9, 2002
70
0
0
Originally posted by: SpideyCU
Originally posted by: aznparty
Who is George Michael? Is he your secret lover?
Umm...does any sane person need more proof than this that this person isn't mature enough to form a legitimate idea?

This thread was clearly designed as flamebait ("I'm just having some fun!") much like the Intel vs. AMD threads elsewhere. There's no "shocking revelation" contained herein.

I didn't start this whole George Michael thing, I was simply replying to Rogue's post. If he hadn't said anything, I wouldn't. I'm not trying to get any1 angry, I'm pointing out the similarities. If you like it ok, if you don't go right ahead. I don't go and attack or insult any1, I just reply to people's posts.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,728
6,755
126
No conjur, my argument is fact. Sorry, I have shown you over and over how the news that Bush won the recount was a lie based on limited recounts. Gore won the total legal vote state wide. The fact is vital to the future since Bush doctrine is as much a userpation of traditional American deplomacy as his presidency is a fraud. It's profoundly significant that he was not elected. Five injustices on the Supreme coup and not America are to blame for the tremendous tragedy of the Bush league.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: aznparty
Originally posted by: SpideyCU
Originally posted by: aznparty
Who is George Michael? Is he your secret lover?
Umm...does any sane person need more proof than this that this person isn't mature enough to form a legitimate idea?

This thread was clearly designed as flamebait ("I'm just having some fun!") much like the Intel vs. AMD threads elsewhere. There's no "shocking revelation" contained herein.

I didn't start this whole George Michael thing, I was simply replying to Rogue's post. If he hadn't said anything, I wouldn't. I'm not trying to get any1 angry, I'm pointing out the similarities. If you like it ok, if you don't go right ahead. I don't go and attack or insult any1, I just reply to people's posts.
Try this one on for size, then:

Comparison between Clinton and Hitler

See...it's ridiculous to compare people like that. Any similarities found can be used to promote a quite distorted view of the actual truth.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
No conjur, my argument is fact. Sorry, I have shown you over and over how the news that Bush won the recount was a lie based on limited recounts. Gore won the total legal vote state wide. The fact is vital to the future since Bush doctrine is as much a userpation of traditional American deplomacy as his presidency is a fraud. It's profoundly significant that he was not elected. Five injustices on the Supreme coup and not America are to blame for the tremendous tragedy of the Bush league.
No, moonbeam. Your 'facts' were shot down.

In your posts from other threads you referred to apparent 'cover-up' or hiding of portions of the recounts. Well, the two recounts that did show Gore as coming out ahead were only when anything resembling any kind of mark on the ballot was counted as a vote. That is hardly a fair way to 'discern the voter's intent'. Especially when that 'standard' was never used before in the State of Florida.

And, I would also like to point out that the vote of the SCOTUS to stop the recount was 7-2. You always seem to leave out that bit of truth. The 5-4 vote was only on the remedy.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,728
6,755
126
Riiiiiiight, the state of Florida has laws determining what ballots are valid and what are not. Gore won by valid ballots according to state law. It's in your fantasy that the ballots were hardly fair of off standard. Gore won with only those ballots that are unambiguously legal. Sorry. Get over it.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Riiiiiiight, the state of Florida has laws determining what ballots are valid and what are not. Gore won by valid ballots according to state law. It's in your fantasy that the ballots were hardly fair of off standard. Gore won with only those ballots that are unambiguously legal. Sorry. Get over it.
Again, no. There is NO law on the books of Florida that determines exactly what is to be considered a legal vote. It's up to the County Commissioners to discern voter intent. Feel free to post a link to the statutes stating otherwise to prove me wrong.

And, back to the 'winning' votes for Gore, the hanging chad was the de facto standard used by the counties (meaning, two corners were detached and the chad was hanging...like an open door.) The votes considered that put Gore in the lead included things like marks on the ballot and only a dimple in the chad, not even one corner detached! And that was not a standard used in the counties in Florida.

Then again, loose standards is a character trait in Dems. :p
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
This particular article was posted on Usenet about 2-3 weeks ago. To begin with, there are a number of significant details that the author (no, not you aznparty) conveniently neglects for the sake of one-sided argument. Significant details such as transition from a virtual monachy under Kaiser Wilhelm to the Weimar Republic; infiltration by the early NASPD into the socio-cultural interactivity of the extensive German club systems ["Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic"; Berman, 1997, Johns-Hopkins University Press]; German resentment and hatred resulting from the idiotic, French-sponsored Treaty of Versailles; severe economic depression and monetary hyper-inflation. The list goes on and on and on.

Actually, in comparision with historical reality, the article in question is mere propaganda. Nothing more to see here folks. Everybody go home.
 

BaDaBooM

Golden Member
May 3, 2000
1,077
1
0
Originally posted by: aznparty
Originally posted by: SpideyCU
Originally posted by: aznparty
Who is George Michael? Is he your secret lover?
Umm...does any sane person need more proof than this that this person isn't mature enough to form a legitimate idea?

This thread was clearly designed as flamebait ("I'm just having some fun!") much like the Intel vs. AMD threads elsewhere. There's no "shocking revelation" contained herein.

I didn't start this whole George Michael thing, I was simply replying to Rogue's post. If he hadn't said anything, I wouldn't. I'm not trying to get any1 angry, I'm pointing out the similarities. If you like it ok, if you don't go right ahead. I don't go and attack or insult any1, I just reply to people's posts.

Then understand that you pointing out the similarities while ignoring the differences is like a neutered dog dry humping the family cat. Nothing will come of it and he can't even come to his own conclusion (pun intended). All it does is let the dog get some jollies while pissing off the cat and everyone else around him. Guess who's the dog... ;)
 

aznparty

Member
Aug 9, 2002
70
0
0
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
Originally posted by: aznparty
Originally posted by: SpideyCU
Originally posted by: aznparty
Who is George Michael? Is he your secret lover?
Umm...does any sane person need more proof than this that this person isn't mature enough to form a legitimate idea?

This thread was clearly designed as flamebait ("I'm just having some fun!") much like the Intel vs. AMD threads elsewhere. There's no "shocking revelation" contained herein.

I didn't start this whole George Michael thing, I was simply replying to Rogue's post. If he hadn't said anything, I wouldn't. I'm not trying to get any1 angry, I'm pointing out the similarities. If you like it ok, if you don't go right ahead. I don't go and attack or insult any1, I just reply to people's posts.

Then understand that you pointing out the similarities while ignoring the differences is like a neutered dog dry humping the family cat. Nothing will come of it and he can't even come to his own conclusion (pun intended). All it does is let the dog get some jollies while pissing off the cat and everyone else around him. Guess who's the dog... ;)

Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: aznparty

Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.
My but you're incorrigible.

If you didn't want people to get 'all worked up' then why did you post such an inflammatory piece of garbage?
 

BaDaBooM

Golden Member
May 3, 2000
1,077
1
0
Originally posted by: aznparty
Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.

Yes.... of course that would be your guess.
rolleye.gif
You post something ignorant like this, be prepared to get flamed.
 

aznparty

Member
Aug 9, 2002
70
0
0
Originally posted by: BaDaBooM
Originally posted by: aznparty
Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.

Yes.... of course that would be your guess.
rolleye.gif
You post something ignorant like this, be prepared to get flamed.

But no seriously, I thought it was interesting so I posted it here. I'm sure some people enjoyed it.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: aznparty

But no seriously, I thought it was interesting so I posted it here. I'm sure some people enjoyed it.
Yeah...it was good for a laugh and a
rolleye.gif
 

aznparty

Member
Aug 9, 2002
70
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: aznparty

Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.
My but you're incorrigible.

If you didn't want people to get 'all worked up' then why did you post such an inflammatory piece of garbage?

Why is it inflammatory? Ok it does't have 100% of the facts but which article does? I showed this to many people, not here, and no1 seems to be too pissed about it. I showed it to Iraqis who fled after the first Gulf War to pro Bush neoconservatives, and yes of course Bush haters as well. No1 seem to have as a big reaction as people here. Oh well...
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: aznparty

Why is it inflammatory? Ok it does't have 100% of the facts but which article does? I showed this to many people, not here, and no1 seems to be too pissed about it. I showed it to Iraqis who fled after the first Gulf War to pro Bush neoconservatives, and yes of course Bush haters as well. No1 seem to have as a big reaction as people here. Oh well...
I can't speak for anyone but myself but I see it for what it is: baseless, inflammatory crap.

To even begin to compare the worst mass murdered in the history of this planet to the sitting President of the U.S. is just so far beyond ridiculous that words fail me now.

And, like I posted above, comparisons between Hitler and Clinton could be made. Heck, I bet I could come up with a list comparing you and Hitler! Catch my drift? It's utterly ridiculous!
 

BaDaBooM

Golden Member
May 3, 2000
1,077
1
0
Originally posted by: aznparty
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: aznparty

Sorry as many of you have pointed out, I'm not very smart so I'm not good at guessing. I will say the Dog is you? I could be wrong though. In any case, like I said, if you don't like the article the fine, no need to get all worked up about it.
My but you're incorrigible.

If you didn't want people to get 'all worked up' then why did you post such an inflammatory piece of garbage?

Why is it inflammatory? Ok it does't have 100% of the facts but which article does? I showed this to many people, not here, and no1 seems to be too pissed about it. I showed it to Iraqis who fled after the first Gulf War to pro Bush neoconservatives, and yes of course Bush haters as well. No1 seem to have as a big reaction as people here. Oh well...

The first time we saw this crap, it wasn't that big a deal. But too many people are posting these stupid things that are worthless. That is why it is flame bait. We are tired of seeing them.
 
Jul 1, 2000
10,274
2
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
What Bush and Hitler have in common is certainty that they are right.

In that case, 50% of the world has something in common with Hitler.
rolleye.gif


Ask the Iraqis what they think about Bush. The last I checked, there were no reports of Iraqi civilians being shaved for their hair, having gold fillings removed from their mouths, herded into "showers," and buried in mass graves.

Those who compare Bush to Hitler have no concept of history or understanding as to the evil that was Adolf Hitler. Hitler killed his own citizens en masse.

Not only that, it is kind of striking that the same drooling idiots that make such comparisons neglect to cite Saddam Hussein for what he has done. There is your Hitler.

Hopefully Saddam met the same fate as Hitler. Dead, in a bunker.
 

NesuD

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,999
106
106
Hmm looks like this thread was started by a Moron. no comment not worth my time.:camera: