But the analysis also found that Gore would have won by three votes if the recount had continued under the standards advocated by Bush supporters.
Seibel noted the irony in that fact.
"The irony, of course, is that the Bush people were always saying you can't count those things," said Seibel. "And the Gore people insisted that they would. But in these counties, it particularly benefited Bush."
not really, i guess you didn't read far enough.
While the analysis showed the Bush would have won if the court-ordered recounts under way at the time of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling had been allowed to continue, it was not a clear win for the GOP.
The study also looked at four scenarios in which the entire Florida undervote was counted ? something that was not ordered by any court ? and found that Gore would have won under two of those.
So i guess you could say.. that conservative media bias is coming through again with those eye grabbing headliners. Nothing new at all.