Originally posted by: darkcyber
Yeah, everyone seem really quick to bash Bush, but I have been in emergency services for a long time and the response to a disaster is local, county, state...then federal. The local and county pretty much couldn't respond...but my question, is where was the STATE and the Governor in this response? Oh, she's a demo...so everyone skipped her and went to blame Bush. And besides that she was to busy doing TV interviews to worry about doing anything. She even admitted that she delayed Federal response by at least 2 days herself, because she didn't like the wording the Federal government sent her.
Come on people...the response wasn't what it should have been...by a long shot...but you need to start the blame at the state level, not the federal...the state didn't do crap...period...expect to complain that the federal wasn't doing anything.
At least Bush finally took responsibity for the federal stuff...LA's governor never has that I know of...she just keeps blaming the feds.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I just hope we can prevent the Pres from developing some sort of complex over having a failure in life. It would be terrible if he got a feeling of being cursed.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
But plenty had been done in between. The Propagandist just broke what Clinton worked to fix.Originally posted by: ExpertNovice
BTW, I agree with some of the other posters. If things were done wrong they need to be changed. Since a very similar situation happened in 1992 it would be surprising if the reasons for both situations were the same and after 13 years (President Clinton 8 + George Bush 5) nothing was done.Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Originally posted by: BBond
Does this mean that Bush is playing the "blame game" now? And doesn't that qualify, along with "You're doing a 'heckuva' job, 'Brownie"!, as another Bush flip-flop???
What next? Will Bush admit he lied about Iraq?
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I just hope we can prevent the Pres from developing some sort of complex over having a failure in life. It would be terrible if he got a feeling of being cursed.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Sh*t man, never knew taking responsibility meant destroying yourself.
At least that's not what my parents taught me, maybe you were taught differently?
You have no idea and you should leave everything right there. You have no idea.Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Sh*t man, never knew taking responsibility meant destroying yourself.
At least that's not what my parents taught me, maybe you were taught differently?
Why the fvck should he? This was not Bush's fault, despite the media's drumbeat to the contrary! Who is at fault? The city of New Orleans (mayor), the state of Louisiana (governor), and a welfare state that waited before it was too late to be rescued.
If anything the 100-ton guerilla that is Federal bureaucracy and red tape, is an argument for a much smaller federal government. How the Libs expect to fix the problem by making the guerilla even heavier and even more cumbersome, I have no idea.
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- President Bush on Tuesday said he takes responsibility for the federal government's failures in responding to Hurricane Katrina.
Text
So, are you liberals happy? Breaking out the champagne? Because the destruction of Bush is all you care about, more so than the Katrina victims.
Sh*t man, never knew taking responsibility meant destroying yourself.
At least that's not what my parents taught me, maybe you were taught differently?
Well, it's what he's taken responsibility *for*. His words were measured carefully. Now, look for the blame game to pick up the intensity toward state/local officials thereby relieving the Propagandist from the heavy burden of fault.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
And please don't be alarmed. When Bush says he takes responsibility it's his way of saying he won't. He has taken responsibility end of subject. But but but,,,but nothing, I take full responsibility. The problem has been cured. Bush takes responsibility,,,that's the end. What a guy. Steps right up to the plate.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Why the fvck should he? This was not Bush's fault, despite the media's drumbeat to the contrary! Who is at fault? The city of New Orleans (mayor), the state of Louisiana (governor), and a welfare state that waited before it was too late to be rescued.
If anything the 100-ton guerilla that is Federal bureaucracy and red tape, is an argument for a much smaller federal government. How the Libs expect to fix the problem by making the guerilla even heavier and even more cumbersome, I have no idea.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
I'm all for it, this is just another blunder he has been directly involved with (naming 'Brownie' head of FEMA). He can cut brush all year round for all I care. Maybe he can make a book deal, I hear pop-up books are gaining in popularity.
I love the critics,
Tell us you would have put in place of Brown.
Not my job to do that. I am nowhere near qualified to make that decision, I know I wouldn't have put someone in who is completely underqualified in every sense of the word. I don't know who I would put in there, but I know who I wouldn't, and Brown fits that bill perfectly.
If you admit to not being anywhere near qualified to make such a decision. What qualifies you to say Brown wasnt qualified? Because the LA times runs an editorial where a pin head who is equally as unqualified as you decides it is time to play the time test liberal policy of personal attacks instead of attacking the problem?
I also find it very unamusing when people throw out the "it isnt good enough" or "that was the wrong decision" without providing a better solution. At that point all you are doing is whining, and whiners are worthless.
And there's the crux of the "argument" of many on the right ... that somehow FEMA is yet another wasteful "entitlement program" that needs to be eliminated. Even the Bush admin believes this to a certain extent given their actions regarding FEMA since 2001.Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Why the fvck should he? This was not Bush's fault, despite the media's drumbeat to the contrary! Who is at fault? The city of New Orleans (mayor), the state of Louisiana (governor), and a welfare state that waited before it was too late to be rescued.
If anything the 100-ton guerilla that is Federal bureaucracy and red tape, is an argument for a much smaller federal government. How the Libs expect to fix the problem by making the guerilla even heavier and even more cumbersome, I have no idea.
You seem to be saying that, regardless of the scope of a disaster or the extent of its failure to respond (since this was demonstrably the worst natural disaster in US history and FEMA's response was essentially nonexistent for several days), FEMA can never be at fault.
This begs the question of what disaster, if any, could be so severe as to warrant a federal response in your opinion. Moreover, even if you're saying FEMA should be gutted as irrelevant, what about the billions of taxpayer dollars we've sunk into it over the years? Are we to expect literally nothing for our expenditures?
Originally posted by: catnap1972
Didn't you get the memo? Personal responsibility doesn't apply to Bushpublicans (only lieberuls, and other "America hating people")
Originally posted by: zendari
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
It's time for Bush to drop this bipartisan crap he's been trying to pull and start ramming through policy.
Originally posted by: zendari
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
It's time for Bush to drop this bipartisan crap he's been trying to pull and start ramming through policy.
