Bush drops to new low in Poll's

[Tab]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.

That's rich coming from you. You're one of the most hate-filled people here. You attack anyone and anything unflattering to your Boy George.

Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

From the guy who instantly, mindlessly rejects this poll solely because it doesn't support his Bush faith. Classic cognitive dissonance. Get well soon.

It's only a flesh wound.

Anyone want to start a fund for "Cad's lobotomy"?

I just hope there will be some left once we take the crap out.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Tab

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.

That's rich coming from you. You're one of the most hate-filled people here. You attack anyone and anything unflattering to your Boy George.

Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

From the guy who instantly, mindlessly rejects this poll solely because it doesn't support his Bush faith. Classic cognitive dissonance. Get well soon.

It's only a flesh wound.

Anyone want to start a fund for "Cad's lobotomy"?

I just hope there will be some left once we take the crap out.

Too late. It's been done already and the operation was, by all appearances, a complete success.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Tab

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.

That's rich coming from you. You're one of the most hate-filled people here. You attack anyone and anything unflattering to your Boy George.

Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

From the guy who instantly, mindlessly rejects this poll solely because it doesn't support his Bush faith. Classic cognitive dissonance. Get well soon.

It's only a flesh wound.

Anyone want to start a fund for "Cad's lobotomy"?

I just hope there will be some left once we take the crap out.

Too late. It's been done already and the operation was, by all appearances, a complete success.

To clarify, you're only talking about the lobotomy, true? The second half of Tab's diagnosis remains.

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Tab

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.

That's rich coming from you. You're one of the most hate-filled people here. You attack anyone and anything unflattering to your Boy George.

Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

From the guy who instantly, mindlessly rejects this poll solely because it doesn't support his Bush faith. Classic cognitive dissonance. Get well soon.

It's only a flesh wound.

Anyone want to start a fund for "Cad's lobotomy"?

I just hope there will be some left once we take the crap out.

Too late. It's been done already and the operation was, by all appearances, a complete success.

To clarify, you're only talking about the lobotomy, true? The second half of Tab's diagnosis remains.

Castration.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Tab

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Engineer

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Ah yes, another media poll to have a story. :roll:

If this poll is anything like the Washington Post-ABC News poll a couple days ago it doesn't mean much. Bad samples and even worse questions.

But hey- you Bush haters can lap up the "news" created by these "news" organizations if it helps you sleep...

CsG

Ah, did I strike a nerve?

Here's a from a severe Bush hater for you to enjoy. Have fun!

Nope - just calling them like I see them. Seems I hit the nail right on the head though from what I'm seeing...

CsG

Yea, like you see them in that distorted and confused mind... or whatever is left of it...

TaB

Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.
Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

CsG

Were you blinded by hatred during the Clinton years, "csg"? Or were you the only Republican in America excercising "critical thinking"?

No. No, I was one of many who were excercising critical thinking.

CsG

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: Tab

"Presidents who are low in the polls have a hard time getting Congress to go along with them," said Charles Franklin, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "He has to persuade the people in Congress to follow his legislative agenda and they're all worried about 2006."

Apparently, this does mean quite a bit....

Any comments Cad?

Yep, the lower his numbers, the less "political capital" he has to force his agenda. Bad news for the Bush faithful, great news for America.

Which is exactly why this "news" was created. But hey, it's no wonder you can't see that - you lap up their "story" without question.

CsG

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: Tab

"Presidents who are low in the polls have a hard time getting Congress to go along with them," said Charles Franklin, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "He has to persuade the people in Congress to follow his legislative agenda and they're all worried about 2006."

Apparently, this does mean quite a bit....

Any comments Cad?

Yep, the lower his numbers, the less "political capital" he has to force his agenda. Bad news for the Bush faithful, great news for America.

Which is exactly why this "news" was created. But hey, it's no wonder you can't see that - you lap up their "story" without question.

CsG

Wait, are you telling me this isn't factual? Where's your evidence Cad?

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Yep, the lower his numbers, the less "political capital" he has to force his agenda. Bad news for the Bush faithful, great news for America.

Which is exactly why this "news" was created. But hey, it's no wonder you can't see that - you lap up their "story" without question.

CsG

In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Yep, the lower his numbers, the less "political capital" he has to force his agenda. Bad news for the Bush faithful, great news for America.

Which is exactly why this "news" was created. But hey, it's no wonder you can't see that - you lap up their "story" without question.

CsG

In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

Don't hurt his feelings now...

DESTROY THEM INSTEAD

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Seeing them from reality. ie: not blinded by hatred.

That's rich coming from you. You're one of the most hate-filled people here. You attack anyone and anything unflattering to your Boy George.

Try some critical thinking for once instead of just lapping up the story the media wants to tell.

From the guy who instantly, mindlessly rejects this poll solely because it doesn't support his Bush faith. Classic cognitive dissonance. Get well soon.

:roll: If you had an honest bone in your body you'd know that you were being dishonest...but hey that's not something people seem to accuse you of being - honest.

If what you said was true, then I'd attack myself -but that doesn't happen so you are obviously lying(or atleast willingly ignorant about the facts) about me attacking anyone who says anything bad about Bush.

:roll: Where exactly did you get where I rejected the poll "solely because it doesn't support" my "Bush faith"? WTF is "Bush faith" anyway? I clearly based my opposition to this "news" based on the fact that media polls are notoriously slanted to get the story they want to tell. The other poll a couple days ago was a great example of this and IF(which you seem to have not read) this one is the same - it should be dismissed as tripe too.

I hope someday you can control your hate and rage... someday...

CsG

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Yep, the lower his numbers, the less "political capital" he has to force his agenda. Bad news for the Bush faithful, great news for America.

Which is exactly why this "news" was created. But hey, it's no wonder you can't see that - you lap up their "story" without question.

CsG

In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

 

[judasmachine]

a uniparty congress/whitehouse is bound to become unpopular as they show their unwillingness to compromise with those few members of other parties. the circle jerk gets tiring after a while.

 

[Stunt]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

Yeah, wake up and smell the conspiracy?!?...huh? :roll:

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Stunt

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

Yeah, wake up and smell the conspiracy?!?...huh? :roll:

Your words - not mine.

If you don't see that these "news" polls are created by the "news" source then there is little help for you.

CsG

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger
In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

"WAAAAAAAAA! I'll get you, Reality, and your little dog too! WAAAAAAA!" Get help.

One by one, Americans are snapping out of their trance. Bush's flock is dwindling, his so-called "political capital" evaporating. Those are the facts. Deal with it.


edit: fixed quoting

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

"WAAAAAAAAA! I'll get you, Reality, and your little dog too! WAAAAAAA!" Get help.

One by one, Americans are snapping out of their trance. Bush's flock is dwindling, his so-called "political capital" evaporating. Those are the facts. Deal with it.

Woot - avoid the question - your specialty.

"The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?"

CsG

Edit to fix your formatting

 

[Stunt]

Originally posted by: judasmachine
a uniparty congress/whitehouse is bound to become unpopular as they show their unwillingness to compromise with those few members of other parties. the circle jerk gets tiring after a while.

Originally posted by: Stunt
Our government officials in Canada are polling very low as well. I think people are getting sick of the partisanship in governments...time to start building bridges people...49% of the electoral cannot be considered completely wrong.

You think like me... :thumbsup:

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
In other words, "WAAAA! WAAAAA! Reality's picking on me! WAAAAAA!". I understand why you avoid it.

:roll:

:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

"WAAAAAAAAA! I'll get you, Reality, and your little dog too! WAAAAAAA!" Get help.

One by one, Americans are snapping out of their trance. Bush's flock is DYING, his so-called "political capital" evaporating. Those are the facts. Deal with it.

Fixed.

 

[homercles337]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Ah yes, another media poll to have a story. :roll:

If this poll is anything like the Washington Post-ABC News poll a couple days ago it doesn't mean much. Bad samples and even worse questions.

But hey- you Bush haters can lap up the "news" created by these "news" organizations if it helps you sleep...

CsG

Im going to call you out on this one. Since you are an expert in survey design would you care to elaborate--rather than talk outta ya ass that is.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: homercles337

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Ah yes, another media poll to have a story. :roll:

If this poll is anything like the Washington Post-ABC News poll a couple days ago it doesn't mean much. Bad samples and even worse questions.

But hey- you Bush haters can lap up the "news" created by these "news" organizations if it helps you sleep...

CsG

Im going to call you out on this one. Since you are an expert in survey design would you care to elaborate--rather than talk outta ya ass that is.

call me on what?

CsG

 

[Tab]

Originally posted by: Stunt

Originally posted by: judasmachine
a uniparty congress/whitehouse is bound to become unpopular as they show their unwillingness to compromise with those few members of other parties. the circle jerk gets tiring after a while.

Originally posted by: Stunt
Our government officials in Canada are polling very low as well. I think people are getting sick of the partisanship in governments...time to start building bridges people...49% of the electoral cannot be considered completely wrong.

You think like me... :thumbsup:

I'd agree with that as well...

Now, if we could only outsource a little more....then maybe I could afford a second 20.1" monitor

 

[Czar]

cad,
are you dismissing all this?
http://www.ap-ipsosresults.com/

are you dismissing all this as well?
http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pa/presidentialRatings.cfm

 

[Stunt]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Stunt

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
:roll: Get a clue and try reading for once. The media clearly creates "news" with these sorts of polls -no? If not - then who is creating the poll news?
If the media wants a certain outcome - would they not pick a sample that reflects that? Would they also not ask questions they want to use to create a better "story"?

Wake up bowfinger - your hate has lulled you into an irrational sleep.

CsG

Yeah, wake up and smell the conspiracy?!?...huh? :roll:

Your words - not mine.

If you don't see that these "news" polls are created by the "news" source then there is little help for you.

CsG

Or they could be tracking public opinion as they alway have, we have polls in Canada, done by the same companies you have in the States, and they tend to be accurate...not showing favoratism to a political party.

Many organizations find it benificial to track public opinion, I'm sure Republicans do their own internal polling as well. This left wing media agenda is getting old... especially after the blatent support of the current admin during the last while.

 

[Last Rezort]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Engineer

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Ah yes, another media poll to have a story. :roll:

If this poll is anything like the Washington Post-ABC News poll a couple days ago it doesn't mean much. Bad samples and even worse questions.

But hey- you Bush haters can lap up the "news" created by these "news" organizations if it helps you sleep...

CsG

Ah, did I strike a nerve?

Here's a from a severe Bush hater for you to enjoy. Have fun!

Nope - just calling them like I see them. Seems I hit the nail right on the head though from what I'm seeing...

CsG

Call them like you see um aye? Im tired of lefties and righties who claim," Bad News" every time they hear somthing they dont like. Like the Bible thumpers who pick and choose which peices of the Bible to believe. You want to claim partisan, overly polerized news scources wrote that, and they're uncredible? Fine go right ahead, but please pray tell, what new sources are credible. Fox?
Maybe we should make a list, because both the left and the right here love to think they can comment as to the validity of things they know little to nothing about.
And by the way CAD nice job 4 reapeating what engineer said right back to him. Very clever realy!:roll:

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Czar
cad,
are you dismissing all this?
http://www.ap-ipsosresults.com/

are you dismissing all this as well?
http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pa/presidentialRatings.cfm

Did I say I did?

Did I not specifically talk about media crated polls? Did I say I fully dismissed the "findings"?

Why no - no I didn't. However I did say that it doesn't mean much when it's a media created poll to have "news" - especially when the sampling and questions are bad.

But hey, you guys can just lap it all up without question...:roll:

CsG