• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Burisma, Hunter, Bribery, Crack cocaine, etc

Page 31 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I don't have time. If you open the link I provided, it provides a link to the actual report, which looks impeccably done and cited.
 
So just enough time to shit post and run?

Not sure what’s in the report but from what I gleaned that site is run by a financial guy who used to teach in China but then got kicked out for being critical of China.

Strange site to be doing political journalism.
 
Yea, he had enough time to read that lengthy post, read a 64 page report, and share it here, but not enough time to summarize it or give his thoughts. LOL

Tough crowd. I just had a client show up at work, so now I don't have time. Too lazy to click a mouse?
This is some damning shit. It connects Joe to Quid Pro Quo. They were on the take, while Biden was VP.
 
Tough crowd. I just had a client show up at work, so now I don't have time. Too lazy to click a mouse?
This is some damning shit. It connects Joe to Quid Pro Quo. They were on the take, while Biden was VP.
Well, if there's legitimate, actionable data there, let's see some formal charges and and a trial.
 
It seems Trump's surprise guest at the debate tonight is going to be Tony Bobulinski.

To which America asks: Who?

This is what happens when your campaign is so enormously online that it doesn't even share the same dimension with the electorate.
 
Tough crowd. I just had a client show up at work, so now I don't have time. Too lazy to click a mouse?
This is some damning shit. It connects Joe to Quid Pro Quo. They were on the take, while Biden was VP.

I scanned it and it says nothing that has not been spewed by FAUX. It mentions PERSON A or something like that. Who is the source? It’s a friend of his, as he states earlier. Really. I would never write a report from what a “friend” told me and ruin that relationship.

It seems you did not summarize because you know it would have been debunked.
 
I scanned it and it says nothing that has not been spewed by FAUX. Is mentions PERSON A or something like that. Who is the source? It’s a friend of his, as he states earlier. Really. I would never write a report from what a “friend” told me and ruin that relationship.

It seems you did not summarize because you know it would have been debunked.

He's employing the seagull method of engagement...

1*nEKFPFedN5eyuIltF3zDUw.jpeg
 
It seems Trump's surprise guest at the debate tonight is going to be Tony Bobulinski.

To which America asks: Who?

This is what happens when your campaign is so enormously online that it doesn't even share the same dimension with the electorate.
And I'm over here thinking "debates have surprise guests?"
 
BWAHAHAHHAHHAHAA

I briefly look at @compuwiz1 link and saw Has leverage over a Biden Family Member.
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN REGARDING THE PRESIDENT TAXES
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN REGARDING HIS FAMILY DEBT
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN REGARDING IVANKA AND JARED’s VARIOUS SECURITY CLEARANCE PROBLEMS.

WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN THE LAST 3 TO 4 YEARS.

The author of that link sounds like one of our resident AT Deplorable’s.
“I voted Trump in 2016 but don’t intend to vote Trump 2020, now let me shit all over Biden”
 
Last edited:
Tough crowd. I just had a client show up at work, so now I don't have time. Too lazy to click a mouse?
This is some damning shit. It connects Joe to Quid Pro Quo. They were on the take, while Biden was VP.
The report is 64 pages long and no crime is suggested to occur, the GOP had TWO investigations of the Biden's while the impeachment was ongoing and the information in the report is stated as "official public China documents" yet not one person from either committee's spotted anything to bring to the table to help Trump, WHY IS THAT?.
 
Back
Top