Bumping Dead Threads

[KLin]

Now it's starting to get annoying. :thumbsdown:

 

[MustangSVT]

nope. I dont browse offtopic regularly and most thread is not time dependent, so it doesnt matter much.

just like the ad on abc, "if you havent watched it, its new to you!"

 

[acemcmac]

not at all

 

[tfinch2]

BUMP

 

[Pocatello]

Yes, it is annoying 🙂

 

[nakedfrog]

Man... I was gonna find that other thread about bumping dead heads, but it appears to be gone.

 

[40Hands]

Its kind of like kicking a dead horse! LET IT BE ALREADY!

Damn, I just kicked it again.

 

[rudeguy]

TTT

 

[psiu]

Well, it's a new month. It appears that some don't like bumping old threads. But then, wouldn't it be a repost if you created a new thread when there was already one serving it's purpose? Or what if the thread got missed the first time?



Or when people forget and post in a thread they already posted in months before?

 

[ribbon13]

*O Fortuna starts playing in ambience*

Oh mighty power of ribbon13, I draw from myself
Resurrect this thread I shall
From death to bizzumpus
BUMP THE DEAD THREAD!

 

[chrisms]

It doesn't bother me

 

[quakefiend420]

i could have sworn this got locked...

guess not

 

[HaruhiSuzumiya]

Okay i know i'm gonna get A LOT of crap for this, but i just thought you guys should know, this thread is the 2nd result for the search "bumping dead threads" on bing.

And when i saw the last post was from 2005 and it's almost a decade later....i had to bump this post. This is a piece of history right here and i can't let it die.

And i'm assuming you people can't either or this thread would've been locked LONG ago.

 

[lamedude]

While crawling this thread BingBot has become sentient. WW3 is indeed upon us.

 

[Red Squirrel]

I tend to not notice dates so it does not really bother me.

 

[RelaxTheMind]

indeed. some posters have moved on or no longer with us. 🙁

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Okay i know i'm gonna get A LOT of crap for this, but i just thought you guys should know, this thread is the 2nd result for the search "bumping dead threads" on bing.

And when i saw the last post was from 2005 and it's almost a decade later....i had to bump this post. This is a piece of history right here and i can't let it die.

And i'm assuming you people can't either or this thread would've been locked LONG ago.

Please join us.

 

[PlanetJosh]

The new guy from post #213 had a great chance to start a new thread about his Bing search.

 

[Carson Dyle]

I'm so pissed off that this thread has been bumped for no reason. You can't even imagine how pissed off I am. I may do something rude.

 

[PlanetJosh]

Are you going to take it out on one of us recent posters of the last 2 hours?

 

[Maximilian]

Okay i know i'm gonna get A LOT of crap for this, but i just thought you guys should know, this thread is the 2nd result for the search "bumping dead threads" on bing.

And when i saw the last post was from 2005 and it's almost a decade later....i had to bump this post. This is a piece of history right here and i can't let it die.

And i'm assuming you people can't either or this thread would've been locked LONG ago.

I love you man... Best bump ever! :biggrin:

 

[Thebobo]

I personally don't have a problem with necro threads it allows you to tie the past and present together in a thread.

 

[manimal]

Necros are like buttsecks. Once in a while is ok but too much and shit gets outta hand