• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Building a new rig

Pray To Jesus

Diamond Member
What's best CPU in term of performance/price given a modest overclock? It need to be faster than my i7-950 at 4.2Ghz.
 
In terms of raw frequency for price, the FX-4300 can shoot way over 4.2 as long as you've got the cooler for it. I think Newegg has a promo code on it too right now. Whatever you do, if you're buying AMD, buy Vishera. Do NOT buy the Zambezi series processors. Their numbers seem similar, but the architecture is just a whole different ball game.
 
In terms of raw frequency for price, the FX-4300 can shoot way over 4.2 as long as you've got the cooler for it. I think Newegg has a promo code on it too right now. Whatever you do, if you're buying AMD, buy Vishera. Do NOT buy the Zambezi series processors. Their numbers seem similar, but the architecture is just a whole different ball game.

He needs it to be faster than the i7 920 @ 4.2GHz.

@ OP: i7 3930K. If you don't need that much power, then i7 3770K.
 
What're you going to use the rig for? If it's something which loves cores (like video editing), the 3930k is the way to go.
 
What're you going to use the rig for? If it's something which loves cores (like video editing), the 3930k is the way to go.

Should've been the first response to this thread :thumbsup:

That, and budget :biggrin:

That said, a 3770K seems like the logical upgrade choice to me, though I'd be waiting for Haswell at this point.

Edit: Especially because completely unfounded rumors are pointing to it having OC magic.
 
What're you going to use the rig for? If it's something which loves cores (like video editing), the 3930k is the way to go.
If you don't need 6 cores then I'd wait to see what haswell's OC potential is...as your current cpu is no slouch at 4.2GHz.
 

edited out the spam
Markfw900
Anandtech Moderator.

😀


back on topic, Nehalem at 4.2GHz still is quite fast, if you need to upgrade, you can't go lower than 3770K or 3930K I think,
but the 4770K is so close to being released that you should probably wait a little bit more,
or if you really can take advantage from 6 cores, just go with the 3930K (and is not to concerned about power usage, with 4.2GHz it's probably the case)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is going on in this thread??
SPBHM google translated by the looks of it some russian balla hawking his fishing game spam. Looks pretty dope.

Russian fishing - a game played by millions. This unique simulator of fishing on the computer got tremendous popularity thanks to the amazing similarity of gameplay with real fishing.

See?
 
Last edited:

edited out the spam
Markfw900
Anandtech Moderator.

😀


back on topic, Nehalem at 4.2GHz still is quite fast, if you need to upgrade, you can't go lower than 3770K or 3930K I think,
but the 4770K is so close to being released that you should probably wait a little bit more,
or if you really can take advantage from 6 cores, just go with the 3930K (and is not to concerned about power usage, with 4.2GHz it's probably the case)

This CPU is 2+ years old but still one of the top dog? Jeez
 
I wouldn't say "top dog," but CPU improvements are much more incremental than before, especially on the Intel side. Even a 5 year old CPU can be called "competent" for basic day-to-day tasks even if it's not the fastest any more.
 
Initially I thought that my CPU is getting old, so surely after 2 years the speed increase would be a lot with an upgrade. Now, I get the feeling that an upgrade is pointless at this time given the slow progress of x64 speed.
 
I upgraded from a 965 to a i7 3770. Bottom line, night and day difference. Still wait for the 4770K, no reason not to, even if Haswell is only incrementally faster than Ivy Bridge, its nearly right around the corner.
 
Back
Top