Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: Frackal
Doubt it, given that XTX is faster than 7900gt sli is a great many situations, and with a slight OC, faster than 7800gtx 512 SLI in oblivion for instance, with 50% faster minimum frames as well
2 heads are better than 1 in high res
7950 is a much better choice if you are getting 1900XTX.. its much faster !( somewhere between 7900GTX SLI and 7900GT SLI)
why not 1900XT? its cheap and fast...
Oh gee you're cherry picking this stupid FEAR benchmark over and over.
Go look at the 7950gx2 review itself.
They use the XT at stock, add about 5-10% to that for an XTX and you get a card that bests the 7900gt SLI in more cases than not, and is pretty close to the GX2 very often.
Not to mention in Oblivion in which a slightly OCd XTX beats 7800GTX
512mb SLI in both maximum and minimum framerates and supposedly beats a GX2 as well but I haven't seen the benchies myself
I just upgraded to XTX and was debating between the two but the XTX had image quality I wasn't willing to let go of, and still has stupid fast performance, particularly when OCed.
I borrowed an XTX to test it against my 7800gtx 256 to see whether it was worth upgrading and not only did it more than double performance of the GTX but the image quality was absolutely superior in not only features like HQ AF and HDR+AA but moreso the picture quality the card broadcasts to my monitor, which is less on the GTX and not a good thing at all. I noticed textues on BF2 medic packs, and other stuff like that that the GTX picture was too blurry to see, which is BS IMO
Unless G80 is much faster than R600 and/or has better image quality I probably will be going ATI from now on. I had 2 nvidia cards before this XTX and the XTX is the only one that has really blown me away in performance and image quality