I don't know, I thought Fitzpatrick was supposed to be playing very well. Is that not the case?
The Edwards debacle also rests on Gailey's shoulders and shows, like the defensive situation above, that Chan doesn't know what to do.
Look at his stats. Fitzpatrick IS playing very well. For comparison's sake:
Ryan Fitzpatrick - 1200 passing yards, 159 rushing yards,
12 TD's, 5 INT's, 0 Fumbles
Tom Brady - 1602 passing yards, 11 rushing yards,
12 TD's, 4 INT's, 1 Fumbles
Matt Ryan - 1714 passing yards, 64 rushing yards,
12 TD's, 5 INT's, 0 Fumbles
Peyton Manning - 2184 passing yards, -6 rushing yards,
15 TD's, 2 INT's, 1 Fumble
Phillip Rivers - 2649 passing yards, 33 rushing yards,
15 TD's, 7 INT's, 3 Fumbles
Drew Brees - 2334 passing yards, -5 rushing yards,
16 TD's, 11 INT's, 1 Fumble
Keep in mind that Fitzpatrick did
not play/start the first two games of the season. With the exception of Peyton Manning, he's putting up points and NOT throwing INT's. Yeah his yardage is a bit low, but you should easily be able to put another 500 yards if he were to start those two games in the season. Fitzpatrick simply is playing way better than expected, and he's playing pretty smart too. Typical Fitzpatrick would be throwing 1 INT for every TD he throws. Given the receivers he has, it's rather remarkable his stats are as good as they are.
The Edwards debacle, yeah... that's Gailey's fault, and he'll admit it. Edwards simply looked sharp in preseason, but once again that didn't translate on game day. Can't blame Gailey for going with what appeared to be the best choice.
As far as defense, George Edwards runs the defense in Buffalo. Yeah, the head coach has sway, but switching to 3-4 there was nothing to lose. At the very least it identified the weak links in the defense (the front seven) and gave them a target to draft/acquire for next year.
Simply put, Gailey came into this season knowing his team wasn't going to win it all. Nix acknowledge this early in the season as well. Buffalo started the season in a rebuilding year, and there was no argument otherwise. To be fair, look at the progress that HAS been made. An anemic offense is putting up points against top ranked defenses. They took Baltimore to overtime and a bad turnover ended the game. They took Kansas City to overtime despite having 240+ rushing yards posted against them, and SHOULD have won that one (but lost it on the leg of their kicker, who MADE the 53 yard kick as a timeout was called).
I personally think Gailey is doing a good job with what he has. I make no claim that Buffalo is a "good" team right now, but they definitely do seem to be heading in the right direction. A few good choices in players to shore up the defense, a little better offensive line play (particularly the tackles), and you have a game. Last piece of the puzzle is a franchise QB, and things take off from there.