• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Budget card, less than $50?

S

Shyatic

Platinum Member
Just need to play CSGO (low resolution), Diablo 3, Minecraft and Heroes of the Storm. Nothing too fancy. Any thoughts?

Happy to buy one on FS/FT but it needs to be readily available. I have an old Radeon 5670 but it struggles a lot in HOTS, though it might be a CPU issue.

FYI, this will be paired with a stock G3258 (no overclocking).

Thanks for any thoughts!
 
I'll sell you a 9600GSO for the price of shipping. (Older card, little baby brother to the 8800GT/9800GT.) Takes one 6-pin PCI-E power connector.

AS-IS, but I'll give you a 14-day non-DOA on it.

Note that this is pre-Fermi, so is not supported by the newest NVidia drivers. You'll have to hunt down some "legacy" drivers.

dual DVI-I, and a TV-out port. (No native HDMI, no audio out)

PM for price and payment info, if you're interested.

Edit: Wait, you currently have a 5670, that's not failing? I don't think that my 9600GSO is any faster than that one.

Do what Arachnotronic said. There really aren't any true gaming cards available under $100. Most of them are DDR3 pieces of junk. (I've got some GT630/GT730 Kepler 384 CC GPUs, with 1GB DDR3 on them, that I could get rid of too, but I can't really imagine using one of them for any serious gaming.)

Whatever you do, get something with GDDR5 on it, rather than DDR3, or worse.
 
Last edited:
Depends on your monitor size and resolution, but the 5670 was more for 720p and it was only a basic card at that. For the best value, I'd look at getting a 1080p capable card 2-3 generations old, eg the GTX 650 Ti, GTX 660, HD 7850, or HD 7870. You can get one here for $40-50, or try Craigslist.
 
There's a 270X on the FS/FT forum for $50 right now which would be a pretty massive step up from your 5670. From the other side of the aisle, a 750Ti would be a great choice if you are power constrained, but you'll probably have a hard time finding one for $50. The 660 jana mentioned would be as quick or quicker than a 750Ti, and you can probably pick one up in your budget.
 
Arachnotronic said:
I would save up and buy either a GTX 1050 or RX 460 for around $100.
Click to expand...
460 on sale today for $80AR, 1050 for $100AR, both on newegg.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...&cm_re=power_color_460-_-14-131-695-_-Product

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814137057&Tpk=N82E16814137057


every once in a while you can find an R9 380 on sale for $100. if your power supply can handle it (meaning, it's a name brand after market unit of 400 watts+, such as a corsair, antec, xfx, etc.), it's a bit faster than the 1050 from the reviews i was looking at this morning. but that's double your budget.

otherwise, as others have said, there's nothing *new* that's $50 and much of a step up from what you've got.
 
mohit9206 said:
Best card for $70 new - GT730 2GB GDDR5
Best card for $70 used - 750Ti 2GB GDDR5
Click to expand...

Those are such terrible options.

Powercolor RX 460 2GB (no 6 pin required) was as low as $65 AR brand new. You can get RX 460 2GB's regularly for about $80 AR new that will demolish a GTX 750 Ti. GTX 1050 2GB can be had for about $100 AR, but it's 25% more expensive and it isn't 25% faster. Next viable new option would probably be the GTX 950 2GB, they can be had for $90 AR sometimes.

Used market varies a lot, but you can pick up a R9 270/370/270X/370X (or 7850/7870 variant), GTX 660/760 for around $50. Just avoid the 1GB versions or anything older. But that's a crapshoot sometimes, and you're better forking over $30 more for a new RX 460 2GB/GTX 950 2GB... IMO.
 
Last edited:
daxzy said:
GTX 1050 2GB can be had for about $100 AR, but it's 25% more expensive and it isn't 25% faster
Click to expand...

$80 to $100 is 20% not 25%. Just saying.

Less than $50.?
The 270x for $50 is the best deal out there.
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/fs-gigabyte-r9-270x-2gb.2496222/

It might be as fast as a new rx460. mabe faster?!
perfrel_1920.gif

I think the 270x is faster than a 460.
perfrel_1920_1080.png
 
Last edited:
sorry my math is terrible. I thought 80 was 80% of 100 leaving 20% or $20.
20 x 5 =100.

If a gtx1050 is $100 it costs 20% more money if a 460 is $80.
That's how I see it.
 
Last edited:
If you literally have only $50 to spend, then you're in a bit of a pickle. Buying used is your best bet, since none of the 'new' cards at $50 are worth the cardboard they're boxed in - not for gaming at least. Video cards under $50 are for adding multi-monitor support to desktops that didn't come with them, and perhaps hardware-assisted video decode acceleration for people with old integrated video that doesn't support it. Not for gaming.
 
Math lol. It's more about grammar, depends on how you phrase it.

$80 is 20% less than $100. But $100 is 25% more than $80.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top