Breaking News: Chinese men measure up to others below belt

[Shlong]

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: Shlong

Originally posted by: Proletariat

Originally posted by: Shlong
Well 911TZ I don't know about penis size but what about highest national IQ average:
a.. Hong Kong - 107

b.. Korea, South - 106

c.. Japan - 105

d.. Korea, North - 105*

e.. Taiwan - 104

f.. Austria - 102

g.. Germany - 102

...aa.. United States - 98

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1460 / http://groups.msn.com/africanconnection...39903&LastModified=4675517981773711835

Interestingly enough while looking up IQ average on google I came across this racist propoganda by christian party? http://christianparty.net/iq.htm :roll:

Bleh. I haven't found one Asian philosopher that has interested me. And I appreciate all cultures. I've found many interesting German, Indian, British, Italian, French, Russian philosophers but really I mean all Asia's got is Confucius. I think in rote schoolbook stuff Asians have an advantage but in abstract thought Europe and India are much more advanced.

Of course not, you criticize anything east asian. As if you have an agenda to put it down? As for Philosophers, Chuang Tzu? Lao Tzu, author of the Tao Te Ching? Sun Tzu, Art of War (many strategies used today). Mencius, Mou Zong-san, Wang Yangming, Tsong-kha-pa, Chu Hsi, Kukai, etc.

I have an agenda to speak the truth.

As for those philophers most if not all have to do with Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism. Find something new already.

Who is Tsong-Kha-spa? I assume you are talking about the great Je Tsongkhapa, the TIBETAN buddhist philosopher. His philosophies are much more in line with Indian thought. Gautam Buddha himself predicted his coming in the 14th century during his meditations in Bihar.

To speak the truth you say? Your opinions, but it seems like you like to concentrate on speaking the truth only when it comes to far eastern culture. Why not speak the truth on a broader scale than concentrate on solely this? Anyways, Confucianism and Neo-Confucianism? Much like a lot of Indian philosophy also have to do with Hinduism? Find something new as well? Or is there more to it? Enlighten me, pun intended.

 

[glugglug]

The following pieces of information were left out of the press release:

1) The volunteers were the "scientists" themselves
2) The general rule that self-measurements average 0.5-1" higher than measurements taken by medical professionals for what should be obvious reasons applies here.
3) this other study with a much larger sample size confirms asians really are smaller.

 

[EKKC]

woot im from HK!

 

[Phokus]

Originally posted by: glugglug
The following pieces of information were left out of the press release:

1) The volunteers were the "scientists" themselves
2) The general rule that self-measurements average 0.5-1" higher than measurements taken by medical professionals for what should be obvious reasons applies here.
3) this other study with a much larger sample size confirms asians really are smaller.

That 'survey' is an internet survey which is worse than a live survey. According to that survey, white men are larger than black men.

 

[Krk3561]

Blacks = owned by the white man

http://www.sizesurvey.com/fig5.gif

 

[BrokenVisage]

For a repost this thread is having a longer than average life span.. die maybe?

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: thelanx
Um flaccid size and erect size do not have a strong correlation if I recall correctly.

That's actually not true, you can actually predict the size of an erect penis with fair accuracy based on the flaccid size.

No you can't. Some guys are "show-ers" and some are "growers". Flaccid size is not an indicator of erect length.
Some guys don't go down that much when not hard, and don't grow much when hard.
They "show' length.

Some guys go way down when not hard, and therefore theirs gets a lot bigger when hard.
They "grow".

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: Actaeon

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: thelanx
Um flaccid size and erect size do not have a strong correlation if I recall correctly.

That's actually not true, you can actually predict the size of an erect penis with fair accuracy based on the flaccid size.

And if i recall, a smaller flaccid penis will grow erect larger (percentage wise compared to it's flaccid size) and a larger flaccid penis will grow erect smaller (percentage wise compared to it's flaccid size). This is why John Holmes wang doesn't grow to like 20 inches long when he gets hard (his flacid and erect lengths are very close together, percentage wise)

To say flaccid size and erect size has no correlation is silly.

You should be given the special title of Penis Expert.

Maybe i should become a urologist

Or a Pocket Fisherman.

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: deathkoba
So does anyone want to see a pic of my beer can?

Not unless it says "Bud" on the side.

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: rh71

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Wow, what a worthless study.

First of all it's a study about Chinese men released in China by Chinese researchers.

Second of all, who the hell cares about flaccid size when referring to their penis?

Third of all, they gave the numbers and they were, in fact, smaller than the Western examples they gave.

perfect ! So all we know after this study is that Americans can continue to be proud of their 0.13 inch lengthier flaccid penis! Those Chinese sure are hampered... let's continue bashing their penises!

We don't care about our .13" advantage when flaccid. We care about that 2-3" advantage when erect.
So do your women.

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: rh71

Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Wow, what a worthless study.

First of all it's a study about Chinese men released in China by Chinese researchers.

Second of all, who the hell cares about flaccid size when referring to their penis?

Third of all, they gave the numbers and they were, in fact, smaller than the Western examples they gave.

perfect ! So all we know after this study is that Americans can continue to be proud of their 0.13 inch lengthier flaccid penis! Those Chinese sure are hampered... let's continue bashing their penises!

Oh, and you've done a pretty good job of letting us know where you stand on the "charts".
Or is that "flop".

 

[OffTopic1]

Chinese Men Measure Up to Others Below the Belt....a Hong Kong study = Inferiority complex bias.

PS. What a fruitless study, because all they have to do is ask a few hookers and they would get a pretty good anwers.

 

[Landroval]

Originally posted by: Phokus

Originally posted by: glugglug
The following pieces of information were left out of the press release:

1) The volunteers were the "scientists" themselves
2) The general rule that self-measurements average 0.5-1" higher than measurements taken by medical professionals for what should be obvious reasons applies here.
3) this other study with a much larger sample size confirms asians really are smaller.

That 'survey' is an internet survey which is worse than a live survey. According to that survey, white men are larger than black men.

Even if were live, it is not scientifically valid as the sampling is completely messed up.

 

[Staples]

Why are we measuring flaccid penises?

They must of had too many subjects like me.

3.33" > 1"

Yep.

 

[imported_Dispatch]

flaccid size is inaccurate. it varies by mood and weather, etc.

the penises measured should have been fully erect to conduct a more accurate experiment.

facts - black dudes have bigger flaccid size but only slightly larger erect size

caucasians have bigger bonified johnsons than asian guys.

this experiment sucks.